On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Janez Kosmrlj
wrote:
> OK I figgured out the client part. But unfortunately this was the easy part.
> I still can't figure out, what i'm doing wrong on the server.
> I tried installing deltarpm package from epel and the newest createrepo
> package from atrpms (del
Hey
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Stephen Nelson-Smith
wrote:
> I have a site running drupal. The apache user therefore needs to be
> able to write certain files (CSS files for example).
>
> I also have a directory under my web root which is a SAN mount, to
> which apache must be able to wri
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:52 PM, David McGuffey
wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 20:31 +, John Horne wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 18:57 -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
>> > Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
>> > following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guid
You can also use google docs
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:02 PM, MHR wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Sorin Srbu
> wrote:
> >
> > So basically, CentOS+OOO3.1 vs WinXP+OOO3.1 scores 1 to 0. Good work
> CentOS
> > and OOO teams!
>
> Thanks for the laugh, Sorin!
>
> mhr
> __
On Nov 29, 2009, at 3:52 PM, David McGuffey
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 20:31 +, John Horne wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 18:57 -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
>>> Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
>>> following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guida
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> I have a zone that has several hosts update their ip with Dynamic DNS updates.
> This morning a client had updated its ip, but bind wasn't returning the new ip
> when queried until I restarted the daemon?
>
> Google hasn't yielded anything
At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:55:28 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Tosh wrote:
> >
> > Add to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX
> > The following 2 lines :
> > PEERDNS=no
> > NM_CONTROLLED=no
> >
> > Line 1 tells the the if commands not to override /etc
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 20:31 +, John Horne wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 18:57 -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
> > Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
> > following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
> > whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a bet
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Tosh wrote:
>
> Add to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX
> The following 2 lines :
> PEERDNS=no
> NM_CONTROLLED=no
>
> Line 1 tells the the if commands not to override /etc/resolv.conf
> Line 2 tells NetworkManager that it doens't have control over that
>
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
> Rudi,
> As I recall there was a thread about this a few weeks ago.
> Please show your /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX contents.
> Thanks
>
>
> ___
Hi Rob,
Here's the contents:
[r...@i
On 29/11/09 22:43, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a CentOS 5.4 server-only installation, i.e. no X installed, and
>> for some odd reason /etc/resolve.conf gets overwritten by
>> NetworkManager on a constant basis. I haven't been able to track down
>> how often, but I
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
I have a CentOS 5.4 server-only installation, i.e. no X installed, and
for some odd reason /etc/resolve.conf gets overwritten by
NetworkManager on a constant basis. I haven't been able to track down
how often, but I think it's on the hour, or something.
This is the co
At Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:57:23 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a CentOS 5.4 server-only installation, i.e. no X installed, and
> for some odd reason /etc/resolve.conf gets overwritten by
> NetworkManager on a constant basis. I haven't been able to track down
> how often,
Hi all,
I have a CentOS 5.4 server-only installation, i.e. no X installed, and
for some odd reason /etc/resolve.conf gets overwritten by
NetworkManager on a constant basis. I haven't been able to track down
how often, but I think it's on the hour, or something.
This is the conents of the file rig
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 18:57 -0500, David McGuffey wrote:
> Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
> following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
> whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
>
> I installed AIDE and did
fakessh wrote:
>
>> how to incorporate the certificates in postfix?
>>
Does this help?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix_sasl
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> David McGuffey wrote:
>>
>> Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
>> following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
>> whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
>>
>>
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Rob Townley wrote:
>>
>> NIC ordering is a problem. Some say it is the multi cpu, some say bad
>> BIOS, some say MAC address ordering is better, some say PCI bus
>> enumeration is better. The netdev mailing list has had a long running
>> dis
> hi all
>
> hi postfix list
>
> I worked all day to develop my certificates
> with certificates free of startssl
>
> I based this document
>
http://translate.google.fr/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.grandville.net%2FOpenSSL%2FLigneDeCommande&sl=fr&tl=en
>
> I realize
Rob Townley wrote:
>
> NIC ordering is a problem. Some say it is the multi cpu, some say bad
> BIOS, some say MAC address ordering is better, some say PCI bus
> enumeration is better. The netdev mailing list has had a long running
> discussion on this issue. The CTO of Dell and members of HP alo
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> David McGuffey wrote:
>
>> Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
>> following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
>> whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
>>
>>
On Nov 29, 2009, at 3:27 AM, Rob Townley wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Ross Walker
wrote:
There was a kernel update maybe the move from C4 to C5 which caused
grief with Dell hardware, where it reversed the order Broadcom
devices
are detected, still does and needs manual swapping
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:00 PM, David McGuffey
wrote:
>
> Maybe I should check to see if Evolution on F11 can export the db into
> something that Evolution on 5.4 can import.
Yes. If you are lucky, that will work OK. Possibly you can find some
information on the Novell support site. Sounds like
David McGuffey wrote:
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
I installed AIDE and did a quick test of AIDE and after initializing
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Tom H wrote:
>> Digging around google a bit more I came up with different rules,
>> and
>> fingers crossed, they seem to work!
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", SYSFS{address}=="00:1b:21
25 matches
Mail list logo
