Re: [CentOS] Why swap if there's still physical memory available

> Also, the top values may not tell the whole story - RES should include > paged-in code plus memory allocated by the program. VIRT includes code > not paged in yet and linked shared libraries, so the difference may not > all be in swap. > I thought I remembered reading (maybe LKML) that RE

Re: [CentOS] serial console config package?

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Larry Brigman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote: >> I've been installing CentOS via PXE and using a serial console >> interface.  The installation works great.  I notice that during the >> install process, the following line gets added

Re: [CentOS] serial console config package?

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote: > I've been installing CentOS via PXE and using a serial console > interface.  The installation works great.  I notice that during the > install process, the following line gets added automatically to > /etc/inittab: > >  co:2345:respawn:/sbin

[CentOS] serial console config package?

I've been installing CentOS via PXE and using a serial console interface. The installation works great. I notice that during the install process, the following line gets added automatically to /etc/inittab: co:2345:respawn:/sbin/agetty ttyS0 9600 vt100-nav Which package does this? Is it kudz

Re: [CentOS] stupid Centos-DS questions

Alan McKay wrote: This is the sort of thing that leaves me baffled : http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/Creating_Directory_Entries.html It tells me the following, but does not really provide a context for me as to why I'd want to do this or how this would relate to the real

Re: [CentOS] New install RAID 1+0

On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:54 -0800, Benjamin Franz wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > I have a new server to setup. 4 hard drives and I had intended it to be > > hardware raid but that's a long story. > > > > Does it make sense to set up the first two hard drives with RAID-0 > > partitions and then get

Re: [CentOS] New install RAID 1+0

Craig White wrote: > I have a new server to setup. 4 hard drives and I had intended it to be > hardware raid but that's a long story. > > Does it make sense to set up the first two hard drives with RAID-0 > partitions and then get through the install and then go back later and > then create identic

Re: [CentOS] simple NFSv4 setup

On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 at 9:21am, Kwan Lowe wrote > Not sure if this applies in your FS4 setup, but most of my NFS > permissions errors have stemmed from user ID mismatches on the host > server. My NFS4 mounts are not using any true NFS4 features, however. My problem isn't a permissions issue -- it

Re: [CentOS] New install RAID 1+0

On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:42 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > I have a new server to setup. 4 hard drives and I had intended it to be > > hardware raid but that's a long story. > > > > Does it make sense to set up the first two hard drives with RAID-0 > > partitions and then get

Re: [CentOS] New install RAID 1+0

On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 11:30 -0700, Craig White wrote: > I have a new server to setup. 4 hard drives and I had intended it to be > hardware raid but that's a long story. > > Does it make sense to set up the first two hard drives with RAID-0 > partitions and then get through the install and then go

Re: [CentOS] stupid Centos-DS questions

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:40 PM, S.Tindall wrote: > Look at the fedora 389 directory server (aka fedora directory server) > documentation: thanks - on my way! -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food" ___

Re: [CentOS] New install RAID 1+0

Craig White wrote: > I have a new server to setup. 4 hard drives and I had intended it to be > hardware raid but that's a long story. > > Does it make sense to set up the first two hard drives with RAID-0 > partitions and then get through the install and then go back later and > then create identic

Re: [CentOS] stupid Centos-DS questions

On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 12:31 -0500, Alan McKay wrote: > This is the sort of thing that leaves me baffled : > > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/Creating_Directory_Entries.html > > It tells me the following, but does not really provide a context for > me as to why I'd want t

[CentOS] New install RAID 1+0

I have a new server to setup. 4 hard drives and I had intended it to be hardware raid but that's a long story. Does it make sense to set up the first two hard drives with RAID-0 partitions and then get through the install and then go back later and then create identically sized RAID-0 partitions o

Re: [CentOS] stupid Centos-DS questions

This is the sort of thing that leaves me baffled : http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/Creating_Directory_Entries.html It tells me the following, but does not really provide a context for me as to why I'd want to do this or how this would relate to the real-world problem I am

Re: [CentOS] my mail is refusing messages

Eero Volotinen wrote: > Nelson Gonzaga wrote: > >> Hi there, >> I trying to send e-mail using this: >> >> mail -s "maillog" ngonz...@yahoo.com < >> /var/log/maillog >> >> but sendmail refused and I don't know why, see my maillog: >> >> Nov 19 14:31:33 servertdoc se

Re: [CentOS] my mail is refusing messages

Nelson Gonzaga wrote: > Hi there, > I trying to send e-mail using this: > > mail -s "maillog" ngonz...@yahoo.com < > /var/log/maillog > > but sendmail refused and I don't know why, see my maillog: > > Nov 19 14:31:33 servertdoc sendmail[11258]: nAJGVXXi011258: from=r

[CentOS] my mail is refusing messages

Hi there, I trying to send e-mail using this: mail -s "maillog" ngonz...@yahoo.com < /var/log/maillog but sendmail refused and I don't know why, see my maillog: Nov 19 14:31:33 servertdoc sendmail[11258]: nAJGVXXi011258: from=root, size=353085, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200911191631.najgvxxi01

Re: [CentOS] stupid Centos-DS questions

Alan McKay wrote: > OK, I'm mostly through everything up to and including Chapter 5 in > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/install/Installation_Guide-Advanced_Configuration-Making-DS.html > > And looking through the ToC for the rest, I do not see that my > questions will be answere

Re: [CentOS] Oracle RAC 9i on RH AS 4 Update 5

> Hi all, > I've got problem when run command "gsdctl start", and appeared error like > this : > /home/oracle/jre/1.1.8/bin/../lib/i686/native_threads/libzip.so: > symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with > link time reference (libzip.so) > Unable to initialize threads: ca

Re: [CentOS] Oracle RAC 9i on RH AS 4 Update 5

Wahyu Darmawan wrote: > Does anyone can help me? Appreciate with your response. Go talk to Oracle, that's a big reason someone would go with a company like Oracle is the support. Make sure your configuration is on their supported list as well. nate ___

Re: [CentOS] Oracle RAC 9i on RH AS 4 Update 5

Wahyu Darmawan wrote: > Hi all, > I've got problem when run command "gsdctl start", and appeared error like > this : > /home/oracle/jre/1.1.8/bin/../lib/i686/native_threads/libzip.so: > symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with > link time reference (libzip.so) > Unable to

Re: [CentOS] ATA error: hard drive going bad?

Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > Hello all, > > Probably a stupid question, but I'll ask the pros just to be sure. Time > for a new hard drive? Usually is when errors occur. You can get more information about drive's health using smartctl -a /dev/device -- Eero, RHCE _

[CentOS] Oracle RAC 9i on RH AS 4 Update 5

Hi all, I've got problem when run command "gsdctl start", and appeared error like this : /home/oracle/jre/1.1.8/bin/../lib/i686/native_threads/libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference (libzip.so) Unable to initialize threads: cannot find clas

Re: [CentOS] stupid Centos-DS questions

OK, with some URL hacking I found this - http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/index.html Staring into it ... -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food" ___ Cen

[CentOS] ATA error: hard drive going bad?

Hello all, Probably a stupid question, but I'll ask the pros just to be sure. Time for a new hard drive? Nov 16 17:35:42 weather3 kernel: ata1.01: exception Emask 0x40 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x80800 action 0x6 Nov 16 17:35:42 weather3 kernel: ata1: SError: { HostInt 10B8B } Nov 16 17:35:42 weather

[CentOS] stupid Centos-DS questions

OK, I'm mostly through everything up to and including Chapter 5 in http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/install/Installation_Guide-Advanced_Configuration-Making-DS.html And looking through the ToC for the rest, I do not see that my questions will be answered by this doc. So please fe

Re: [CentOS] simple NFSv4 setup

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 at 4:05pm, Tim Nelson wrote > >> - "Joshua Baker-LePain" wrote: > >>> /export         $CLIENT(ro,fsid=0) >>> /export/qb3     $CLIENT(rw,nohide) > >> Your export: >> >> /export/qb3     $CLIENT(rw,nohide) >> >> An

[CentOS] What is the best way to setup Auto Failover Redundancy for Vicidial with Asterisk on CentOS or other Linux OS?

There seems obviously quite a lot of possible setup for server clustering and redudancy, but let's say considering about three mid-range servers only with FoneBridge --- What could be the best way to setup Auto Failover Redundancy for Vicidial with Asterisk on CentOS or other Linux OS? Sam -