>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Christopher Chan
>Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 2:35 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>Ubuntu for desktop is really a give and take. You get
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Matt
>Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 11:29 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>Thats my thought as well. Ubuntu desktop and CentOS for servers.
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Marcelo M. Garcia
>Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 11:08 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>>> Sorry, but Fedora is no longer a good desktop cho
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Postfix can handle that. You can have multiple lookup tables/maps. They
>> do not even have to be the same type of database.
>>
>
> I guess I can leave that part upto Postfix, but I still need a antispam
> addin...
>
spamassassin via spamass-milter. Fast, no compl
Eric Clark wrote:
> Is there a real big need for having an anti-virus on linux?
>
> if so what are some good ones to use?
>
Will the software be used in a commercial environment? If not, then you
could use AVG from Grisoft:-
>Postfix can handle that. You can have multiple lookup tables/maps. They
>do not even have to be the same type of database.
I guess I can leave that part upto Postfix, but I still need a antispam
addin...
I asked on the Postfix list a while ago whether multiple LDAP server lookups
could be config
Eric Clark wrote:
> Is there a real big need for having an anti-virus on linux?
Not unless your running a mail server or file server that
serves clients that are vulnerable to viruses.
> if so what are some good ones to use?
I've always liked Sophos myself, very high quality.
nate
__
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
> Has a beta been released and if so can anybody say whether it uses Upstart?
>
> or Has anyone worked with Upstart?
> ___
No beta has been released. No ETA for a beta has been released. It
will m
Is there a real big need for having an anti-virus on linux?
if so what are some good ones to use?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
well I finally got Keepass installed on CentOS
The libraries for qt4 are actually located at pbone as well as keepass.
I would love to know how to add pbone.net as a trusted repo in Yum,
just for you guys that like to work with cross operating systems and having
a password manager.
Keepass is pr
>
> Eric Clark wrote:
> have you tried getting KDE to run?
>
Eric,
Thanks, that's a good suggestion to try KDE - so far I haven't figured
out how to install it short of a complete reinstall. If I run yom I get
a message to the effect that a database is malformed. It downs't say if
the data
Has a beta been released and if so can anybody say whether it uses Upstart?
or Has anyone worked with Upstart?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Alberto, please don't reply to a previous email and change the subject
line. Click on New Message when starting a new topic.
You screw up the threading, and is considered thread hijacking.
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd
021-295-1923 www.knossos.net.nz
Matt wrote:
>>> I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. He
>>> needs are small. She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and browsing,
>>> so
>>> equivalents there are not a problem. She needs grip and lame, for her mp3s
>>> -
>>> again no problem.
>>>
>>
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I am mulling over the thought of replacing my current solution, it
> works very well except for the following two issues:
>
> 1. LDAP recip verification for only one server, this gateway services multiple
> domains who's directories are independent. I need to be able to ve
I'd like to chime in on this.
Being techy. nothing really bugs me as I think its all POS.
However I do think the Linux desktop is not so good in general.
I've been a big fan of Irix and used to maintain it when it was the
golden child of the Unix desktop.
I've been following the 5dwm project
At Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:29:12 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> >> I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. Â He
> >> needs are small. Â She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and
> >> browsing, so
> >> equivalents there are not a problem. Â She needs grip an
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 17:49 -0400, Alberto García Gómez wrote:
> Here is my problem
>
> [r...@shannon CGPMcAfee]# ./updateDatFiles
> CGPMcAfee DAT files update program version 2.2
> Local avvDAT version is 5726
> Connecting to 'update.nai.com' [72.247.238.178:80] via HTTP protocol...
> *** failed
Here is my problem
[r...@shannon CGPMcAfee]# ./updateDatFiles
CGPMcAfee DAT files update program version 2.2
Local avvDAT version is 5726
Connecting to 'update.nai.com' [72.247.238.178:80] via HTTP protocol...
*** failed to connect: socket error
The problem is that I can't change the script and
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>
>> 2. I use backup mx's, my current solution probably could work in this
>> scenario but
>> the support mechanism behind it is *very* weak and I can't get a perfect
>> setup
>> working. Spam hits the primary for a domain, gets blocked and then trie
>> I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. He
>> needs are small. She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and browsing, so
>> equivalents there are not a problem. She needs grip and lame, for her mp3s -
>> again no problem.
>
> Desktop, non-techie - use Ubuntu in
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf
>> Of Marcelo M. Garcia
>> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:57 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>>
>> Sorry, but Fedor
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> I am mulling over the thought of replacing my current solution, it
> works very well except for the following two issues:
>
> 1. LDAP recip verification for only one server, this gateway services multiple
> domains who's directories are independent. I need to be able to ve
I am mulling over the thought of replacing my current solution, it
works very well except for the following two issues:
1. LDAP recip verification for only one server, this gateway services multiple
domains who's directories are independent. I need to be able to verify the
various domains off of i
> I have a server that is running centos 5.3 x86_64 that until last week was
> running fine. With no error messages in console and in /var/log/messages
> the server simply stops responding.
I posted the following bug to RedHat yesterday for similar symptoms
with RHEL 5.4, same kernel.
https://bu
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 08:24 +0100, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
> >From Karan's blog:
>
> A few of us are going to be getting together for drinks on the Tuesday
> 29th Oct 2009, everyone is welcome to come along. I'll get there for
> about 18:15hrs and plan on being around till about 20:00 - Dep
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:08, Daniel Bruno
wrote:
> I did a "ls -la" in /usr/lib/libtcl8.4*, and show this result:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 683136 Jul 25 2008 /usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Set 10 2008 /usr/lib/libtcl8.4.so;48c78993
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 22:41, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> Many people have wondered what my rsync syntax was -
>
> [as root]: rsync -av /path/to/source m...@remote-host:/path/to/dest
Is /path/to/source mounted NFS?
What happens if you run it as your own user?
> I'll be adjusting it to adapt to
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 18:27 +0200, Santi Saez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any working script, similar to deboostrap, for CentOS 5?
>
> I have found rpmstrap [1] at RPMforge.. but only works for CentOS-4, and
> appears that's out of date.
>
> thanks!
>
> [1] http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/rpm
On 28/09/09 17:27, Santi Saez wrote:
> Is there any working script, similar to deboostrap, for CentOS 5?
yum --installroot ;
tends to do most of what people want with rpmstrap. Does that tick the
box for you ?
the other workaround is to use mock and build the chroot using that.
- KB
__
Hi,
Is there any working script, similar to deboostrap, for CentOS 5?
I have found rpmstrap [1] at RPMforge.. but only works for CentOS-4, and
appears that's out of date.
thanks!
[1] http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/rpmstrap/
--
Santi Saez
http://woop.es
__
Unfortunately too short notice, or I would have welcomed the opportunity
to meet up, have a beer, maybe some curry and say hello.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: 28 September 2009 09:36
To: CentOS
> Finally, where on the installation cd’s would I place this kickstart file ?
See the instructions I sent out a few weeks ago on how to set up your
own KS server
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
_
On Sep 27, 2009, at 9:35 PM, Karanbir Singh
wrote:
> On 28/09/09 02:11, Ross Walker wrote:
>>> Eg. to convert this setup into a raid-5 : start with a 1 disk raid-1
>>> degraded, move a disks worth of data onto there, bring in the second
>>> disk and let them sync into a 'normal' raid1 state, th
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 09:02 -0400, mbneto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a server that is running centos 5.3 x86_64 that until last week
> was running fine. With no error messages in console and
> in /var/log/messages the server simply stops responding.
>
> After a reboot everything is fine. The on
I went ahead and gave the MIT Kerberos LDAP backed option a try. So far it
seems to work quite well and nothing has crashed (yet :)). I'm going to run
this setup for a couple weeks and see if I can break it.
Regards,
Dan Burkland
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
Hi,
I have a server that is running centos 5.3 x86_64 that until last week was
running fine. With no error messages in console and in /var/log/messages
the server simply stops responding.
After a reboot everything is fine. The only change (that I could find) but
that was not active before the
it's all about the open source, baby.
http://candyandaspirin.blogspot.com/2009/09/next-adventure-in-ecm-begins.html
DISCLAIMER: the lady in question is a good friend of mine. but don't
let that scare you off. :-)
rday
--
On Monday 28 September 2009 00:30, Eric Clark wrote:
> Boot to linux, and type memtest86 let it run for about 10 or 20
> minutes with the ram that you have installed
>
> Typically anything over 6 errors on a 512 stick will bring mayhem to
> an OS,
Any errors at all when running memtest86 is un
I'd love to attend, but tomorrow is my birthday and I've already made plans.
Regards,
Rohan.
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
> From Karan's blog:
>
> A few of us are going to be getting together for drinks on the Tuesday
> 29th Oct 2009, everyone is welcome to come along. I'll get there for
> abo
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Marcelo M. Garcia
>Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:57 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>Sorry, but Fedora is no longer a good desktop choic
On 09/27/2009 08:09 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:13:04 +0200 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>>
>> m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
>>
>>> I'd add in the search RHEL, at least to start. Beyond that,
>>> some other distro, such as mandrake, may have compatible rpms.
>>
>> No! Never
Please Read the information concerning "Guidelines for CentOS Mailing
List posts" at the bottom of this link:
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16
Specifically, it is much easier to follow a quoted e-mail on the list if
you do not "top post".
It is also better to set your e-
Hi all,
First of all I am posting this on two lists for a reason, because the
issue being reported by me could be because of a change delivered by a
Kernel update or due to Xen.
I have recently managed to update all Xen Guest domains running CentOS
5.3 to the latest bunch of updates + Kernel. My
Hi All,
Thanks for all your replies. I understand what I have to do now and
have read several tutorials to get a good grasp of everything.
All your input has been greatly appreciated. Thank you all.
Regards,
James ;)
--
Jonathan Swift - "May you live every day of your life." -
http://www.brai
On 28/09/09 04:17, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote:
> [updates]
> name=CentOS-2 updates
> baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-2/updates/
> ;baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/2.1/updates/i386/
actually this one should be :
http://vault.centos.org/2.1/updates/
( without the i386 at t
On 28/09/09 04:17, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote:
> [base]
> name=CentOS-2 base
> baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos-2/i386/CentOS/
> ;baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/2.1/final/i386/CentOS/
that second url looks correct. Is it possible for you to post the
complete trace from y
On 28/09/09 08:53, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 09/28/2009 09:24 AM, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
>> Tuesday
>> 29th Oct 2009
>
> October 29th is a Thursday. Doesn't he mean September?
oops yes! 29th Sept!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 03:17 +0100, M. Hamzah Khan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 21:10 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:40:17 +0100 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey everyone,
> > >
> > > My home server just had a disk failure a few weeks ag
On 09/28/2009 09:24 AM, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
>Tuesday
> 29th Oct 2009
October 29th is a Thursday. Doesn't he mean September?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Mobile: +45 22 12 53 25
Email:
From Karan's blog:
A few of us are going to be getting together for drinks on the Tuesday
29th Oct 2009, everyone is welcome to come along. I'll get there for
about 18:15hrs and plan on being around till about 20:00 - Depending
on how many people are around and what the feeling is - we might nip
a
51 matches
Mail list logo
