Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:48, nate wrote:
>
>> RAID 6 has a pretty good performance hit vs RAID 5 due to the
>> extra parity disk, on some arrays the performance hit is even
>> greater as the array calculates parity twice, NetApp I think has
>> as good a R
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Clint Dilks wrote:
>>> I have some pb for running java on my system with Firefox 3.0.12
>>> System centos 5.3 - kernel 2.6.18-128 x86_64
>>>
>>> When I tested my java config on
>>> http://www.java.com/en/download/installed.jsp?detect=jre&try=1
I did find that info on google as well, but, that other info regarding
globbing was extremely helpful thanks ;).
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of frank.brodb...@klingel.de
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:33 AM
To: CentO
does anyone know if any repositories have OpenSC built for EL4 ? I've
been struggling with building this myself, trying to get an Aladdin
eToken working with OpenSSL so we can use it for client authentication
of an SSL session.
___
CentOS mailing l
On 24/09/09 07:41, Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) wrote:
> I was having yum errors while updating our CentOS-2 box. Further
> reading lead me to a readme file on the mirrors
> (http://mirror.centos.org/centos-2/readme.txt) and it gave me the new
> URL to use for CentOS-2 mirrors.
what did
> I really wish RH would hop on the /srv bus. The broad distinction is
> fairly easy to grasp: /var for variable data of general interest to
> the machine, /srv for stuff related to a specific service. In general,
> /var is machine-generated, /srv is person-generated.
>
> If you maintain it with $E
on 9-24-2009 1:48 AM hadi motamedi spake the following:
> Dear All
> I tried to mount an external cdrom on my CentOS 5 server but
> un-successful . I attached the device to my USB port and then the
> followings have been added to my /dev folder :
> "cdrom -> scd0
> cdrom-sr0 -> scd0
> cdrw -> scd0
on 9-23-2009 11:41 PM Matt Arnilo S. Baluyos (Mailing Lists) spake the
following:
> Hi all,
>
> I was having yum errors while updating our CentOS-2 box. Further
> reading lead me to a readme file on the mirrors
> (http://mirror.centos.org/centos-2/readme.txt) and it gave me the new
> URL to use f
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Drew wrote:
>> The other thing is that ubuntu does some things I consider odd, and
>> puts some things in odd places (say, not having your web stuff
>> under /var/www, etc).
>
> That may be because they're aiming for compliance with the
> Filesystem Hierarchy Standard ( htt
The other thing is that ubuntu does some things I consider odd, and puts
> some things in odd places (say, not having your web stuff under /var/www,
> etc).
That may be because they're aiming for compliance with the Filesystem
Hierarchy Standard ( http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ ). Web related stuff
It's that same old problem.
Some distros just ignores LSB, and do the way they wants leaving to
some incompatibility issues.
The way you configure network, for example, is different on Debian,
Slackware, etc.
That's bad.
--
Tiago Almeida
tiagov...@gmail.com
> Anne Wilson wrote:
>> I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop.
>> He
>> needs are small. She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and
>> browsing, so
>> equivalents there are not a problem. She needs grip and lame, for her
>> mp3s -
>> again no problem.
>
> Deskto
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
>
> Sorry, but Fedora is no longer a good desktop choice. I was a Fedora
> user, but the distribution is pushing to far the idea of cutting edge
> features.
Yeah, based on some experiences I had with it, I'd be wary of installing
it on systems owned by random innocents
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 24 September 2009 17:50:37 Ron Loftin wrote:
>> My image of the "low-tech" user is the one who surfs the Web, reads and
>> writes e-mail, and does the odd letter or maybe even a spreadsheet in
>> some office tool, along with maybe some simple g
Tiago Almeida wrote:
> IMHO,
>
> I think Fedora is a good choice for Desktop (Although i'm a Debian
> fan), because it's RPM based distro and if you get used to it you'll
> be also at CentOS.
>
> I totally agree that for servers CentOS or RHCE is a good choice.
>
Hi
Sorry, but Fedora is no long
On Thursday 24 September 2009 17:50:37 Ron Loftin wrote:
> My image of the "low-tech" user is the one who surfs the Web, reads and
> writes e-mail, and does the odd letter or maybe even a spreadsheet in
> some office tool, along with maybe some simple games. My experience
> with this category of u
IMHO,
I think Fedora is a good choice for Desktop (Although i'm a Debian
fan), because it's RPM based distro and if you get used to it you'll
be also at CentOS.
I totally agree that for servers CentOS or RHCE is a good choice.
--
Tiago Almeida
tiagov...@gmail.com
___
Florin Andrei wrote:
> I'm a big CentOS fan, I joined even the Facebook group (lol), but its
> place is on the server or, perhaps, on a workstation for a power user
> (or for things like running scientific apps on the desktop). If you're a
> PhD running quantum theory equations with Mathematica
Hi all,
I have created a project for myself in that I would like to store an MIT
Kerberos database inside LDAP (Using OpenLDAP). I have found some relevant
results but most of them are extremely outdated and unreliable. I did however
recently find an article for Ubuntu that was up to date howev
On Thursday 24 September 2009 17:29:18 cornel panceac wrote:
> > Yes - and for those suggesting ubuntu as better for a non-technical user
> > I think the real question is whether the user will do any of their own
> > changes (like adding new programs) and updates. If they do, ubuntu is
> > probabl
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 09:37 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Ron Loftin wrote:
> >
> > difficulty. CentOS on the desktop is what I use, therefore I am in a
> > good position to answer their questions ( which have been very few, so
> > far ) where if I put another distro on their machines, I would h
On Thursday 24 September 2009 16:10:54 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 September 2009 12:38:12 Sorin Srbu wrote:
> >> >-Original Message-
> >> >Of Anne Wilson
> >> >Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:27 PM
>
>
>
> >> >box, which is where I'm testing what's available for her,
Ron Loftin wrote:
>
> difficulty. CentOS on the desktop is what I use, therefore I am in a
> good position to answer their questions ( which have been very few, so
> far ) where if I put another distro on their machines, I would have to
> flail around when some minor point about the desktop or me
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 08:16 +0100, Gavin Carr wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:02:00PM +0100, Andrew Allen wrote:
> > > > Skype detected a camera OK but it doesn't seem to work - and when I
> > > > click the 'test' button it just closes skype down! Any ideas please?
> > >
> > > Is it a bug with
> Yes - and for those suggesting ubuntu as better for a non-technical user
> I think the real question is whether the user will do any of their own
> changes (like adding new programs) and updates. If they do, ubuntu is
> probably a good choice. If they will ask you to do it for them, then it
> w
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>>> My mother runs CentOS on her computer at home. My wife does it on a
>>> portable she lugs around on meetings. Why shouldn't CentOS be suitable
> for
>>> "home" users? CentOS's maintenance cycle alone got me all sweaty and hot
>>> the first time I heard of it. ;-)
>>>
>> Y
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 08:53 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. He
> > needs are small. She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and browsing,
> > so
> > equivalents there are not a problem. She needs gr
Anne Wilson wrote:
> I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. He
> needs are small. She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and browsing, so
> equivalents there are not a problem. She needs grip and lame, for her mp3s -
> again no problem.
Desktop, non-techie
> On Thursday 24 September 2009 12:38:12 Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> >-Original Message-
>> >Of Anne Wilson
>> >Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:27 PM
>> >box, which is where I'm testing what's available for her, but
>> kipi-plugins isn't found be yum list or yum search. Strange when
>>libki
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 00:03, Timothy Chan
wrote:
> Sorry for this newbie question. I am having a problem with yum on centos
> 4.7. When I try something like "yum update" I get the following error:
> file:///misc/CO4/updates/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 5] OSError: [Errno 2]
> No such file or
I have always used Ubuntu for desktop linux and CentOS for servers.
Have never tried CentOS as a desktop. Perhaps I should?
Matt
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. He
> needs are small. She has been used
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Anne Wilson
>Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 2:59 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>On Thursday 24 September 2009 13:37:54 Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:48, nate wrote:
> RAID 6 has a pretty good performance hit vs RAID 5 due to the
> extra parity disk, on some arrays the performance hit is even
> greater as the array calculates parity twice, NetApp I think has
> as good a RAID 6 implementation as there is, though t
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:48 PM, nate wrote:
> It's the array's way of saying it's not really safe to operate a
> 14 disk RAID-4 group in the event of a drive failure. Also performance will
> suffer greatly with such a large data:parity drive ratio.
>
> NetApp RAID DP (what you have):
> http://www
On Thursday 24 September 2009 13:37:54 Sorin Srbu wrote:
> I'm guessing maintenance cycles. Anne?
>
> My mother runs CentOS on her computer at home. My wife does it on a
> portable she lugs around on meetings. Why shouldn't CentOS be suitable for
> "home" users? CentOS's maintenance cycle alone
On Thursday 24 September 2009 13:27:16 Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. He
> > needs are small. She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and
> > browsing, so
> > equivalents there are not a problem. She needs g
On Thursday 24 September 2009 13:34:24 Sorin Srbu wrote:
> Just to be clear, my "there might be some repo(s) for this one" was meant
> as Fedora generally speaking not, FC6 specifically. 8-)
>
OK - I tend to think of FC6 because it's the nearest, I think, to CentOS 5.x.
Anne
--
New to KDE4? - g
On Thursday 24 September 2009 13:23:59 Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote on 09/24/2009 07:54 AM:
> > On Thursday 24 September 2009 12:38:12 Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > I think if the worst comes to the worst it would be possible to install a
> > FC6 package. Pbone says there is a pac
[re-sending with the right email address, hoping the first
email won't make it through..]
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sorry for the OT.
> I've got an IBM N3300-A10 NAS. It runs Data Ontap 7.2.5.1.
> The problem is, from the docs it says that it only supports either RAID-DP
or RAID4.
> What
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Timothy Murphy
>Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 2:27 PM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>Why CentOS, as a matter of interest.
>I'm a great fan of
Am 24.09.2009 um 07:43 schrieb Fajar Priyanto:
> Hi all,
> Sorry for the OT.
> I've got an IBM N3300-A10 NAS. It runs Data Ontap 7.2.5.1.
> The problem is, from the docs it says that it only supports either
> RAID-DP or RAID4.
> What I want to achieve is Max Storage Capacity, so I change it from
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Anne Wilson
>Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:55 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>> I don't know much about Fedora any longer, I gave it up
Anne Wilson wrote:
> I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. He
> needs are small. She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and browsing,
> so
> equivalents there are not a problem. She needs grip and lame, for her
> mp3s -
> again no problem. In fact the only p
Anne Wilson wrote on 09/24/2009 07:54 AM:
> On Thursday 24 September 2009 12:38:12 Sorin Srbu wrote:
...
> I think if the worst comes to the worst it would be possible to install a FC6
> package. Pbone says there is a package for FC6, and also offers an rpm from
> sourceforge. That may be a pos
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sorry for the OT.
> I've got an IBM N3300-A10 NAS. It runs Data Ontap 7.2.5.1.
> The problem is, from the docs it says that it only supports either
> RAID-DP or RAID4.
> What I want to achieve is Max Storage Capacity, so I change it from
> RAID-DP to RAID4, but wit
On Thursday 24 September 2009, Nathan Norton wrote:
...
> All 10 drives are 2T in size.
...
> # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md3 --level=6 --raid-devices=10 /dev/sda1
> /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdi1 /dev/sdj1
> /dev/sdk1 /dev/sdl1 mdadm: layout defaults to left-symme
ju...@mail.com wrote on 09/24/2009 07:01 AM:
> Hey! I have big problem with my centos 5.1. I have two hard discs 500gig
> and 40gig and those are in RAID0. I would like to remowe the small 40gig
> hd and put new 500gig hd and i don't wan't raid0 anymore.
That's quite an odd asymmetric RAID setup
On Thursday 24 September 2009 12:38:12 Sorin Srbu wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>
> Behalf
>
> >Of Anne Wilson
> >Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:27 PM
> >To: CentOS mailing list
> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS f
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Anne Wilson
>Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:27 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>Yea, I know, "I get to keep the pieces" :-) I have both
On Thursday 24 September 2009 10:55:15 Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Anne Wilson a écrit :
> > I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop.
>
> I'm running a small computer business in South France, installing
> desktops and servers for professionals like small companies. I have
>
On Thursday 24 September 2009 10:31:55 Sorin Srbu wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> > Behalf Of Anne Wilson
> >Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:11 AM
> >To: CentOS mailing list
> >Subject: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tec
On 09/24/2009 07:25 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Nathan Norton wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to create a 10 drive raid6 array. OS is Centos 5.3 (64 Bit)
>>
>
> thats way too big of a single raid stripe set.rebuilding that when a
> drive fails will take days, maybe even weeks.
timely blog post!
Hey! I have big problem with my centos 5.1. I have two hard discs 500gig and
40gig and those are in RAID0. I would like to remowe the small 40gig hd and put
new 500gig hd and i don't wan't raid0 anymore.
How can i copy data from 40gig hd to 500gig hd and switch 40gig hd to new
500gig hd?
Ano
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 03:48:35PM +1000, Nathan Norton wrote:
> I am trying to create a 10 drive raid6 array. OS is Centos 5.3 (64 Bit)
>
> All 10 drives are 2T in size.
> Disk /dev/sda: 2000.3 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
> mdadm: size set to 1953511936K
> Continue creating array?
>
> As you can
Anne Wilson a écrit :
> I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop.
I'm running a small computer business in South France, installing
desktops and servers for professionals like small companies. I have
almost exclusively non-tech users, and CentOS + RPMForge + the odd
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Anne Wilson
>Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:11 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: [CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user
>
>I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new
hadi motamedi wrote:
> #mount -t vfat /dev/cdrom-sr0 /mnt/cdrom
try removing "-t vfat" so mount can auto detect the correct fs type
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I'm thinking of giving CentOS to a non-tech user for her new desktop. He
needs are small. She has been used to Mozilla for both mail and browsing, so
equivalents there are not a problem. She needs grip and lame, for her mp3s -
again no problem. In fact the only problem I can see is that gwen
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:48 PM, hadi motamedi wrote:
> Dear All
> I tried to mount an external cdrom on my CentOS 5 server but un-successful .
> I attached the device to my USB port and then the followings have been added
> to my /dev folder :
> "cdrom -> scd0
> cdrom-sr0 -> scd0
> cdrw -> scd0
>
Dear All
I tried to mount an external cdrom on my CentOS 5 server but un-successful .
I attached the device to my USB port and then the followings have been added
to my /dev folder :
"cdrom -> scd0
cdrom-sr0 -> scd0
cdrw -> scd0
cdrw-sr0 -> scd0
cdwriter -> scd0
cdwriter-sr0 -> scd0"
To this end ,
Greetings,
I'm currently using the c5-testing repo on CentOS 5.x/Redhat 5.x. I need to
install APC (Alternative PHP Cache) but I'm getting a missing dependency
error Missing Dependency: php = 5.1.6-23.2.el5_3 is needed by package
php-devel. I was hoping somebody would be able to walk me through
From: hadi motamedi
>Please find below the reply on my CentOS server :
>"#rpm -qil lshw
>package lshw is not installed"
You might need a repository that has lshw...
Rpmforge does by example ( http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/FAQ.php#B )
JD
___
CentOS
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:30:47 +0100
hadi motamedi wrote:
> Please find below the reply on my CentOS server :
> "#rpm -qil lshw
> package lshw is not installed"
Now you know why /usr/sbin/lshw doesn't exist on your computer.
You will achieve better results and waste less of your (and others) time
Hi,
"Sol Fulop" schrieb am 23.09.2009 17:33:32:
> I am trying to use logrotate to rotate our web logs for our various
> vhosted sites to cut down on space and rotate out old logs that are
> not necessary to keep around personally. What Im curious to find
> out, is how supported extended reg
Please find below the reply on my CentOS server :
"#rpm -qil lshw
package lshw is not installed"
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:15:06 +0100
> hadi motamedi wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your reply . Sorry , but my /usr/sbin does not contain lshw
> .
>
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:15:06 +0100
hadi motamedi wrote:
> Thank you for your reply . Sorry , but my /usr/sbin does not contain lshw .
> Can you please do me favor and let me know why my CentOS server does not
> have lshw even after issuing "yum install lshw" ?
rpm -qil lshw
--
MELVILLE THEATRE
Thank you for your reply . Sorry , but my /usr/sbin does not contain lshw .
Can you please do me favor and let me know why my CentOS server does not
have lshw even after issuing "yum install lshw" ?
Thank you in advance
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:05:20 +0100
hadi motamedi wrote:
> Thank you for your message . Sorry that I didn't exactly explain my problem
> . Please be informed that after issuing "#yum install lshw" , I tried to
> issue the lshw command but my CentOS server returned "command not found" .
> Can you pl
On Thursday 24 September 2009, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sorry for the OT.
> I've got an IBM N3300-A10 NAS. It runs Data Ontap 7.2.5.1.
> The problem is, from the docs it says that it only supports either
> RAID-DP or RAID4.
> What I want to achieve is Max Storage Capacity, so I change it f
Thank you for your message . Sorry that I didn't exactly explain my problem
. Please be informed that after issuing "#yum install lshw" , I tried to
issue the lshw command but my CentOS server returned "command not found" .
Can you please let me know what is my problem at now ?
Thank you in advance
70 matches
Mail list logo
