2009/9/2 mbneto :
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what is the current status fro ext4 support in Centos. I've
> noticed that is marked as dev when I try to use it from the installer.
>
> Does anybody have a scary story to prevent using it?
For now, I'm running two C5.3 x86_64 with it without any problem
Hi,
I would like to change permissions of /dev/sda* and /dev/hda* files to
0644. I added the following rules to 99-udev.rules files:
KERNEL=="[hs]d*", OWNER="root" GROUP="disk", MODE="0644
After restarting udev by strat_udev, I checked that permissions were
changed:
[r...@gini rules.d]# l
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I was just curious what the fundamental differences were between the
> 4.x and 5.x branches?
One is based on Fedora Core 3, the other is based on Fedora Core 6.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mai
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 2, 2009 19:34
>
> If the box is the also the mx for the domain for which you want to do
> special routing, I believe there will be a problem if you apply that
> sender_based_routing patch. They cannot share the same mailertable
> lookups. Another table loo
>> Well, give the ricker hack a try.
>>
>
> Will do but I want to understand it a bit better before I do.
>
>
Of course. Therefore the question I posed below.
>> Is that sendmail box also the mx for the domains concerned?
>>
>
> Currently yes but I will be changing the MX for the one
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 2, 2009 18:27
>
> For those that might be interested I have found one other alternative
> called Smart Table available at:
>
> http://www.jmaimon.com/sendmail/anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/smarttab.html
>
> However it is for sendmail 8.5+ and will not work w
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 2, 2009 18:36
>
> You are running 8.13.x?
Yes.
8.13.1 on our primary development server (CentOS 4.8) which is also
our primary mail server.
8.13.8 on our primary production server (RHEL 5.3 soon to be 5.4)
which is the alternate mail server that I was look
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I was just curious what the fundamental differences were between the
> 4.x and 5.x branches?
quite extensive. just a few major components...
c4 c5
kernel 2.6.9 2.6.18
glibc2.3.4 2.5
gcc 3.4.6 4.1.2
apache 2.0.52 2.2.3
php
I was just curious what the fundamental differences were between the
4.x and 5.x branches?
Thanks.
Scott
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
>
>>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
>>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You wi
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
>
> > Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
> > sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
> >
> >
> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild
> sendmail.cf after ap
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
> I have checked most of the centos.org servers, the metadata are ok.
> Most public mirrors only sync from 1 to 4 times a day...
> The metadata generation script might have suffered a hiccup, but
> that should be resolved shortly on all the public
Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:01:06PM +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
>> MHR wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is using mirmon to check
>>> Ah, excellent - many thanks!
>>>
>> Here's my local mirror where you can see the
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:01:06PM +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> MHR wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
> >> http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is using mirmon to check
> >>
> >
> > Ah, excellent - many thanks!
> >
>
> Here's my local mirror where you can see the package is t
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 17:29, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:05:50PM -0700, MHR wrote:
>> I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I
>> get is this:
>
>
> works for me:
>
> ...
> Setting up Update Process
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transact
MHR wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>> http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is using mirmon to check
>>
>
> Ah, excellent - many thanks!
>
Here's my local mirror where you can see the package is there but the
metadata is yet to be updated:
http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/cen
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
> http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is using mirmon to check
>
Ah, excellent - many thanks!
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 05:44:09PM -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
>
> For me it does not work either:
>
> # rpm -q dnsmasq
> dnsmasq-2.45-1.el5_2.1
> # yum clean all
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
> Cleaning up Everything
> Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors
> # yum update d
MHR wrote:
>
> What's up here? Is this really a case of incredibly slow mirrors or
> is there something else?
>
> mhr
>
Same here, kind of. My rsync script pulled the package from my local
(UK) mirror yesterday shortly after it's release was announced, but the
metadata has yet to be refre
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
> works for me:
>
I'm so excited!
> Try the usual 'yum clean all' and retry
>
That was my first resort - no help.
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
> Mark: Verify that your priorities plugin is configured properly. Lanny
>
Here's a grep of them:
[...@mhrichter ~]$ sudo grep -H priority /etc/yum.repos.d/*
Password:
/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo:priority=1 [base]
/etc/yum.repos.d/CentO
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:05:50PM -0700, MHR wrote:
> I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I
> get is this:
< trim your reply to the mailing list!, don't send us the daily digest >
>
> [...@mhrichter ~]$ sudo yum update
> Password:
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror,
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 17:03, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> What's up here? Is this really a case of incredibly slow mirrors or
>> is there something else?
>
> Is it maybe because 2.45-1.1.el5_3 < 2.45-1.el5_2.1 ??? Since '1' < 'e' ?
No, doesn't seem so, I found a way to check that in Pytho
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 16:05, MHR wrote:
> I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I
> get is this:
>
> [...@mhrichter ~]$ yg dnsmasq
> dnsmasq.x86_64 2.45-1.el5_2.1
> installed
>
> According to the announcement (see below),
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:05 PM, MHR wrote:
> I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I
> get is this:
>
> [...@mhrichter ~]$ sudo yum update
> Password:
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> * base: linux.mirrors.es.n
From: Ron Loftin Sent: September 2, 2009 11:48
> On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:38 -0700, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> > From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
> > >
> > > I cannot believe the file is dated 2004. Ah well, I got rid of
> > > sendmail and replaced it with postfix in 2003 whil
I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I
get is this:
[...@mhrichter ~]$ sudo yum update
Password:
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: linux.mirrors.es.net
* updates: centos.g5selfstorage.com
* extras: centos.
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
>>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
>>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>>>
>>>
>> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebui
> The problem here is that my users are a
> rather uncooperative bunch and tend to think that they know better on
> what should be done and then go off and do things their way. And this
> attitude starts at the top and works its way down. Worse yet some of
> this has now become company policy
I ha
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:45:28PM -0400, mbneto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what is the current status fro ext4 support in Centos. I've
> noticed that is marked as dev when I try to use it from the installer.
>
> Does anybody have a scary story to prevent using it?
RHEL 5.4 was just relea
From: Les Mikesell Sent: September 1, 2009 22:35
>
> You can use SMART_HOST to send the mail from any single host
> through a specified relay.
Single host and multiple domains so no go here.
> If the same machine is sending for more than one domain, you may be
> able to configure the applicatio
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:38 -0700, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
> From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
> > > Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
> > > sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
> > >
> > >
> > Looks like it is my t
Hi,
I was wondering what is the current status fro ext4 support in Centos. I've
noticed that is marked as dev when I try to use it from the installer.
Does anybody have a scary story to prevent using it?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:/
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
> > Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
> > sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
> >
> >
> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild
> sendmail.cf after apply
Andrew Allen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 20:06 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
>> Andrew Allen wrote:
>>> I've just installed CentOS 5.3 on my Dell laptop and it seems to have
>>> detected and set-up my wireless card (BCM 4311) correctly as eth1.
>>> However, so far I haven't been able to activate it a
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Andrew Allen wrote:
> Thanks,
> You don't happen to know when that was do you? It would be great to
> benefit from somebody else's experience, if they've managed to get this
> card working in CentOS (5.3). Trouble is, the instructions in the
> readme.txt on the Bro
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 20:06 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> Andrew Allen wrote:
> > I've just installed CentOS 5.3 on my Dell laptop and it seems to have
> > detected and set-up my wireless card (BCM 4311) correctly as eth1.
> > However, so far I haven't been able to activate it and have read the
> > wi
- Forwarded message from rhelv5-l...@redhat.com -
From: rhelv5-l...@redhat.com
To: rhelv5-l...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:17:35 -0500
Subject: [rhelv5-list] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 GA Announcement
Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of the
latest update to Red H
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gabriel - IP Guys
> Sent: 02 September 2009 15:47
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cen
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John Doe
> Sent: 02 September 2009 14:13
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
>
> From: Gabriel - IP Guys
> > FATAL: Cannot connect to MyS
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Christoph Maser
> Sent: 02 September 2009 13:38
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 14:36 +0200 schrieb G
Hi
with the kernel parameters ...
nousb nousbstorage nomsi nodm nodmraid noapic acpi=off pci=nomsi
worked for me ...
Nathan Norton schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulties installing centos 5.3 on the gigabyte
> GA-MA790FX-UD5P motherboard.
>
> Has anyone got centos booting on this m
From: Gabriel - IP Guys
> FATAL: Cannot connect to MySQL server on 'localhost'. Please make sure
> you have specified a valid MySQL database name in 'include/config.php'
>
> The database configuration in config.php is correct, and is readable,
> because if I change the hostname, the error message
Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 14:36 +0200 schrieb Gabriel - IP Guys:
>
> Thank you for your response - I went through those instructions, and
> again, I got the same error as below.
>
> FATAL: Cannot connect to MySQL server on 'localhost'. Please make sure
> you have specified a valid MySQL databas
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Christoph Maser
> Sent: 02 September 2009 13:32
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 12:51 +0200 schrieb G
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Eduardo Grosclaude
> Sent: 02 September 2009 13:12
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Cacti Installation on CentOS 5
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Gabriel - IP
>
Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 12:51 +0200 schrieb Gabriel - IP Guys:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I am attempting to install cacti on CentOS 5.3 64 bit, and I checked
> the wiki, only to find that the instructions are a bit out of date.
> Have these instructions been updated somewhere, or does anyone have
>
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Gabriel - IP
Guys wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I am attempting to install cacti on CentOS 5.3 64 bit, and I checked the
> wiki, only to find that the instructions are a bit out of date. Have these
> instructions been updated somewhere, or does anyone have updated
> ins
Dear All,
I am attempting to install cacti on CentOS 5.3 64 bit, and I checked the
wiki, only to find that the instructions are a bit out of date. Have
these instructions been updated somewhere, or does anyone have updated
instructions, maybe with known gotchas etc?
---
Kind Regards,
Mr G
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:16:31PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like RHEL 5.4 has been released:
>
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1243.html
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html
>
http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/htm
Hello,
It looks like RHEL 5.4 has been released:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1243.html
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html
And before you ask: CentOS 5.4 will be released in 2-4 weeks or so, when
it's ready :)
-- Pasi
___
From: Frank Cox
> I manage some remote multi-user computers where it would be very handy to be
> able to "edit" the users' panel bars remotely, adding, removing and arranging
> applications and icons as needed.
> It's easy to put an icon on a user's desktop -- just write a .desktop file and
> put
> Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
[ ... ]
> Hi Again
>
> Unless I am completely confused won't using mailer table with the option
>
> .domain smtp:[gateway.domain]
>
> where .domain is the domain you are concerned with do what you wish ?
For using a mailertable rule the domain MUST NOT b
John R Pierce wrote:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>>> Sorry, last I checked, there is no sender-based routing support in
>>> sendmail. You cannot even try to create rulesets to get that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Looks like it is my turn to eat humble pie. You will need to rebuild
>> se
54 matches
Mail list logo
