[CentOS] Centos 5.3 - php-5.2.10

2009-08-12 Thread f...@ll
Hi, I was looking a "stable" repo when I find php-5.2.10 wich I can use on my centos 5.3, previously I used a remi and epel repo but now they are have a php-5.3.0. Regards, f...@ll ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/ma

[CentOS] c5-testing

2009-08-12 Thread John R Pierce
is there a list more sutiable for c5-testing discussions? I'd like to install the php-5.2.9 on there, but I'm getting a dependency problem # yum update --enablerepo=c5-testing php Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * rpmforge: fr2.rpmfind.net *

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-12 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM, David G. Miller wrote: > SIGH.  The choice is always bleeding edge (and take your lumps) or stability > but > missing the most recent versions.  I'm looking at a career change (or mid-life > crisis) with the network security classes.  I'm not finding that I enjoy

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Chan Chung Hang Christopher
Max Hetrick wrote: > Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: > >> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5 >> >> has: >> >> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512 count=64 >> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=512 count=64 >> >> Will the joker who put in this particular gem without any warnings or

Re: [CentOS] Million linux virtual machines

2009-08-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 08/06/2009 05:45 PM, Drew wrote: > I think this was one of those random /.esque off-topic sorta posts > that tickles some geeks pink and makes others shake their heads. ah! There was a rumor around recently that a rather large cluster was coming up, and CentOS was in the running for it. I tho

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
Hi, Late to the party, oops! Everything in this email is my personal opinion, and I speak for myself not the project here. Just as Russ and Johnny dont speak for the project either in their emails, they speak for themselves. On 08/06/2009 02:52 PM, Marcus Moeller wrote: > I recently started t

Re: [CentOS] disable virtual terminals during kickstart installation

2009-08-12 Thread James A. Peltier
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, nate wrote: > James A. Peltier wrote: > >> window during installation? It poses a security risk for unattended >> installs. > > Unattended? use serial console > > Even if you don't have one, doesn't matter since it's unattended! > > nate noshell was just what I needed. The

Re: [CentOS] disable virtual terminals during kickstart installation

2009-08-12 Thread nate
James A. Peltier wrote: > window during installation? It poses a security risk for unattended > installs. Unattended? use serial console Even if you don't have one, doesn't matter since it's unattended! nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.or

Re: [CentOS] cups / cli stopped print jobs problem

2009-08-12 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:00:17 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message > > > On occasion, we get a printer that becomes disabled, and jobs begin to > queue up. When the issue is resolved, we re-enable the printer and > usually all the jobs print out. >

Re: [CentOS] vtund segfault

2009-08-12 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 16:10, Daniel Bruno wrote: > I configured a tunnel where the server is a CentOS 5 x86_64 with > compress. In the client don't have problem but in the message log of > the server show this erro: > > vtund[15145]: segfault at 0040 rip 00409774 rsp > 00

Re: [CentOS] disable virtual terminals during kickstart installation

2009-08-12 Thread James A. Peltier
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, James Pearson wrote: > James A. Peltier wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm trying to figure out where the inittab is for a pxeboot/kickstart >> installation so that I can disable virtual terminals that allow for >> interactive input such as CTRL+ALT+F2. I've looked in the /etc >> di

[CentOS] vtund segfault

2009-08-12 Thread Daniel Bruno
I configured a tunnel where the server is a CentOS 5 x86_64 with compress. In the client don't have problem but in the message log of the server show this erro: vtund[15145]: segfault at 0040 rip 00409774 rsp 7fff88d548d0 error 4 I did the same configuration on another se

[CentOS] cups / cli stopped print jobs problem

2009-08-12 Thread Blackburn, Marvin
On occasion, we get a printer that becomes disabled, and jobs begin to queue up. When the issue is resolved, we re-enable the printer and usually all the jobs print out. However, sometimes the first job never prints, but the others do. The cups interface shows the job is stopped. IfI restart the

Re: [CentOS] vnc - single application or a "remote localhost" on Firefox

2009-08-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Frank Cox wrote: > Normally I use VNC-over-SSH to provide a complete desktop to a remote user. I'd recommend trying freenx on the server with the free (as in cost) NX client from http://www.nomachine.com (linux/windows/mac clients are available) on the client side. It's much nicer than vnc espe

Re: [CentOS] disable virtual terminals during kickstart installation

2009-08-12 Thread James Pearson
James A. Peltier wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to figure out where the inittab is for a pxeboot/kickstart > installation so that I can disable virtual terminals that allow for > interactive input such as CTRL+ALT+F2. I've looked in the /etc > directories for the pxeboot initrd as well as the

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Brian Mathis
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Max Hetrick wrote: > Brian Mathis wrote: >> This thread seriously highlights the sort of attitudes that are >> causing major issues in IT in general, and have been for years. >> Whenever someone makes a mistake, we point fingers and call them >> stupid.  We haughtil

Re: [CentOS] vnc - single application or a "remote localhost" on Firefox

2009-08-12 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:21:09 -0700 John R Pierce wrote: > port forward localhost:8080 (or some other arbitrary port) to remote:80 > via ssh.. Thanks for the steer! -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mail

Re: [CentOS] disable virtual terminals during kickstart installation

2009-08-12 Thread James A. Peltier
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Brian Mathis wrote: > Those terminals are started in the inittab file. Looks for the > "mingetty" lines. Clicked send to quickly. I know that the file name that I am looking for is inittab, however, none of the image files seem to contain it. In fact, after the kickstart

Re: [CentOS] vnc - single application or a "remote localhost" on Firefox

2009-08-12 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:23:10 -0400 Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Yes, you can use "plink" (part of PuTTY suite: > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/) on Windows to > create a port forward to the server. Thanks loads! I think I've got 'er whipped now. Just needed someone to push

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-12 Thread lostson
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 20:42 -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > > I am troubled by the window of opportunity that a hacker has between RH > > releasing a point release and CentOS releasing the equivalent. Every RH > > published errata for that stream i

Re: [CentOS] vnc - single application or a "remote localhost" on Firefox

2009-08-12 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:04:08 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > The other approach would be to somehow do use some kind of ssh port-forwarding > under Firefox so he could run Firefox locally on his own computer, and somehow > access http://localhost/ledgersmb on the remote machine. Is there such a > thing

Re: [CentOS] vnc - single application or a "remote localhost" on Firefox

2009-08-12 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 15:04, Frank Cox wrote: > Is there a way to provide a single application to a user instead of a complete > desktop? I think that is possible by changing the .xsession or .xinitrc files of the user, have them start up only Firefox, and maybe use a minimal window manager

Re: [CentOS] vnc - single application or a "remote localhost" on Firefox

2009-08-12 Thread John R Pierce
Frank Cox wrote: > The other approach would be to somehow do use some kind of ssh port-forwarding > under Firefox so he could run Firefox locally on his own computer, and somehow > access http://localhost/ledgersmb on the remote machine. Is there such a > thing > as a "remote localhost" that woul

Re: [CentOS] disable virtual terminals during kickstart installation

2009-08-12 Thread James A. Peltier
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Brian Mathis wrote: > Those terminals are started in the inittab file. Looks for the > "mingetty" lines. I know that much but I can't find the file that contains inittab -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director HPC Coordinator Simon Fraser

[CentOS] vnc - single application or a "remote localhost" on Firefox

2009-08-12 Thread Frank Cox
Normally I use VNC-over-SSH to provide a complete desktop to a remote user. Is there a way to provide a single application to a user instead of a complete desktop? In this case I am looking for a method to provide remote report-viewing access to LedgerSMB for a company's outside accountant. Ledg

Re: [CentOS] disable virtual terminals during kickstart installation

2009-08-12 Thread Brian Mathis
Those terminals are started in the inittab file. Looks for the "mingetty" lines. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:58 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to figure out where the inittab is for a pxeboot/kickstart > installation so that I can disable virtual terminals that allow for > in

[CentOS] disable virtual terminals during kickstart installation

2009-08-12 Thread James A. Peltier
Hi All, I'm trying to figure out where the inittab is for a pxeboot/kickstart installation so that I can disable virtual terminals that allow for interactive input such as CTRL+ALT+F2. I've looked in the /etc directories for the pxeboot initrd as well as the stage2 and minstg2 files. Am I mi

Re: [CentOS] Laptop hd incorrect

2009-08-12 Thread chandlercody
Thank you for the help and info! --Original Message-- From: Lanny Marcus Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org To: CentOS mailing list ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Laptop hd incorrect Sent: Aug 12, 2009 2:45 PM On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:07 PM, wrote: > Thanks for the rep

Re: [CentOS] Laptop hd incorrect

2009-08-12 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:07:17 + CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > Thanks for the reply! Looking at the specs the hd is sata. Also the > documents for rhel are they the same for centos? I'm looking for items > to help me learn/gain knowledge. Yes, the docs for RHEL also apply to CentOS.

Re: [CentOS] Laptop hd incorrect

2009-08-12 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:07 PM, wrote: > Thanks for the reply!  Looking at the specs the hd is sata.  Also the > documents for rhel are they the same for centos?  I'm looking for items to > help me learn/gain knowledge. Should be binary equivalent with RHEL, so the upstream documentation for R

Re: [CentOS] Laptop hd incorrect

2009-08-12 Thread chandlercody
Thanks for the reply! Looking at the specs the hd is sata. Also the documents for rhel are they the same for centos? I'm looking for items to help me learn/gain knowledge. Thank You Cody --Original Message-- From: Robert Heller Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org To: CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] vpn

2009-08-12 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 21:31, chloe K wrote: > Where remote and local address and subnet I can put for vpn configuration in > linux box? Please read this right now: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html It is not the first time that you come to this list with questions that are

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-12 Thread Greg Bailey
David G. Miller wrote: > Ron Blizzard writes: > >> I hadn't logged into Fedora for about ten days -- which was the last >> time I updated it. I updated it again today and it already had 315 >> Megs of updates. I think Fedora is a good distribution, but I don't >> think I would want that kind of u

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Max Hetrick
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5 > > has: > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512 count=64 > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=512 count=64 > > Will the joker who put in this particular gem without any warnings or a > clear explanation for tho

[CentOS] SOLVED: Re: OT: Firefox SSL error on Linux, Firefox OK on Windows - same web site

2009-08-12 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > Using CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) on my Desktop with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.12. > With one web site (LinkShare) I am getting an SSL error, after > clicking to get a more advanced report  I do not get that error, using > Mozilla Firefox 3.0.13 on M$ Window

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Max Hetrick
Brian Mathis wrote: > This thread seriously highlights the sort of attitudes that are > causing major issues in IT in general, and have been for years. > Whenever someone makes a mistake, we point fingers and call them > stupid. We haughtily proclaim that only people who "know what they > are do

Re: [CentOS] Laptop hd incorrect

2009-08-12 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:40:11 + CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > Hello > > I'm new to linux and am trying to install centos 5.3 on my laptop > and it has an ata drive but centos does not see the had or cdrom. > Googleing does not give me much to check. The laptop is a hp-g60 249wm, > lat

Re: [CentOS] OT: Firefox SSL error on Linux, Firefox OK on Windows - same web site

2009-08-12 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 07:24, Lanny Marcus wrote: analytics.linksynergy.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for *.opendns.com >>> >>> It looks like you are getting to an OpenDNS server i

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Brian Mathis
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Alan Hodgson wrote: > > I think this seriously highlights the need to hire competent system > administrators. > > The reason you want to wipe the beginning of the drive is that some > fake-raid controllers write crap to the drive and if you leave it there > some li

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-12 Thread David G . Miller
Ron Blizzard writes: > I hadn't logged into Fedora for about ten days -- which was the last > time I updated it. I updated it again today and it already had 315 > Megs of updates. I think Fedora is a good distribution, but I don't > think I would want that kind of upkeep traffic. (Which is one of

Re: [CentOS] OT: Firefox SSL error on Linux, Firefox OK on Windows - same web site

2009-08-12 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi Lanny, On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:48, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Filipe Brandenburger > wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 07:24, Lanny Marcus wrote: >>> analytics.linksynergy.com uses an invalid security certificate. >>> The certificate is only valid for *.opendns.c

Re: [CentOS] [Off-list] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-12 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi Ian, On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 04:10, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Let me be the second to complain then.  Perhaps after 15 years, it is > now finally time to learn how to use email properly. > > Top posting on replies is also annoying.  Conversations are followed top > to bottom, not bottom to top.

Re: [CentOS] OT: Firefox SSL error on Linux, Firefox OK on Windows - same web site

2009-08-12 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 07:24, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> analytics.linksynergy.com uses an invalid security certificate. >> The certificate is only valid for *.opendns.com > > It looks like you are getting to an OpenDNS server instead of a

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Alan Hodgson wrote: > > Let me be even more clear - if your successor doesn't know what dd does, or > what drives correspond to /dev/sda and /dev/sdb in the box he's working on, > he has no business being within 10 feet of a production server without > careful supervision. What physically corr

[CentOS] Laptop hd incorrect

2009-08-12 Thread chandlercody
Hello I'm new to linux and am trying to install centos 5.3 on my laptop and it has an ata drive but centos does not see the had or cdrom. Googleing does not give me much to check. The laptop is a hp-g60 249wm, latest bios update. The bios does not have any ability to change drive information.

Re: [CentOS] ntp will not drift to correct time

2009-08-12 Thread David G . Miller
Tom Brown writes: > > Hi > > On 5.3 i have a situation where some boxes have been 3 or 4 seconds out > and restarting ntpd has fixed the issue. > > What i dont understand is why the clocks did not drift to the correct > time when the config seems correct in that restarting ntp did correct >

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:41:10 +0800 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5 > > has: > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512 count=64 > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=512 count=64 > > Will the joker who put in this particular gem without any warnings

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Alan Hodgson > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 12:21 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki > > On Wednesday 12 August 2009,

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Alan Hodgson
On Wednesday 12 August 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > My successor at my previous job has gleefully followed those > > instructions (he seriously needs a clueby4 which is why he bothers to > > actually read HowTos) and on a production box (who wants pop-corn and > > soda? Sorry, the er support co

Re: [CentOS] ntp will not drift to correct time

2009-08-12 Thread Tom Brown
> Is the directory /var/lib/ntp present, and with write permissions for > the 'ntp' user? Does the drift file exist? > Does ntpd ever lock in? What do you see in 'ntpq -p' over time? > Are these heavily-loaded boxes, or boxes with wildly-varying loads? > > $ ll /var/lib/ntp total 4 -rw-r--r-

Re: [CentOS] [Off-list] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 13:11 +, Ian Murray wrote: > > actually, enforcing community norms in public is useful > > > Belittlment and patronisation is a community norm? > It normally is not offered as "belittlement and Patronisation" nor taken as such. It is normally offered as generous educa

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 54, Issue 4

2009-08-12 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] ntp will not drift to correct time

2009-08-12 Thread Alan Sparks
Tom Brown wrote: > Hi > > On 5.3 i have a situation where some boxes have been 3 or 4 seconds out > and restarting ntpd has fixed the issue. > > What i dont understand is why the clocks did not drift to the correct > time when the config seems correct in that restarting ntp did correct > the tim

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 10:56 -0400, Max Hetrick wrote: > Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > > Dumb people will find ways to be dumb no matter how much you dumb > > things down... :) > > You can't teach or bottle common sense... ;) > > Even with no warnings on the document, the first sentence states this

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Ned Slider
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5 > > has: > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512 count=64 > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=512 count=64 > > Will the joker who put in this particular gem without any warnings or a > clear explanation for tho

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Max Hetrick
Ray Van Dolson wrote: > Dumb people will find ways to be dumb no matter how much you dumb > things down... :) You can't teach or bottle common sense... ;) Even with no warnings on the document, the first sentence states this is for install time. Anyone that has ever installed an OS should know

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Bassu
I would agree with Max. Doing things you don't know requires you to have a bit of knowledge before proceeding like warnings in a few configuration files to not to go ahead and doom your production systems if you clearly don't understand what any configuration may have been for. It said what it did

Re: [CentOS] OT: Firefox SSL error on Linux, Firefox OK on Windows - same web site

2009-08-12 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi Lanny! How's it going? OK Filipe.:-) > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 07:24, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> analytics.linksynergy.com uses an invalid security certificate. >> The certificate is only valid for *.opendns.com > > It looks like y

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:41:10PM +0800, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5 > > has: > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512 count=64 > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=512 count=64 > > Will the joker who put in this particular gem without any

[CentOS] ntp will not drift to correct time

2009-08-12 Thread Tom Brown
Hi On 5.3 i have a situation where some boxes have been 3 or 4 seconds out and restarting ntpd has fixed the issue. What i dont understand is why the clocks did not drift to the correct time when the config seems correct in that restarting ntp did correct the time. Is there something 'special

Re: [CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Max Hetrick
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote: > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5 > > has: > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512 count=64 > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=512 count=64 > > Will the joker who put in this particular gem without any warnings or a > clear explanation for tho

[CentOS] Dangerous Software Raid instructions on Wiki

2009-08-12 Thread Chan Chung Hang Christopher
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5 has: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512 count=64 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=512 count=64 Will the joker who put in this particular gem without any warnings or a clear explanation for those who need a clueby4 with regards to file systems p

Re: [CentOS] A bit more on the Firefox 3.5.issue

2009-08-12 Thread John Thomas
Mike A. Harris wrote: > http://mharris.ca/pub/el/5/SRPMS/xulrunner-1.9.1.2-0.mh.1.src.rpm > http://mharris.ca/pub/el/5/SRPMS/firefox-3.5.2-0.mh.2.src.rpm > http://mharris.ca/pub/el/5/SRPMS/mozilla-filesystem-1.9-4.src.rpm Mike, thanks! They all built and seem to run well for me. I did have to in

Re: [CentOS] OT: Firefox SSL error on Linux, Firefox OK on Windows - same web site

2009-08-12 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi Lanny! How's it going? On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 07:24, Lanny Marcus wrote: > analytics.linksynergy.com uses an invalid security certificate. > The certificate is only valid for *.opendns.com It looks like you are getting to an OpenDNS server instead of a LinkSynergy server... This looks like e

Re: [CentOS] [Off-list] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-12 Thread Ian Murray
> actually, enforcing community norms in public is useful Belittlment and patronisation is a community norm? From: Steve Huff To: CentOS mailing list Sent: Wednesday, 12 August, 2009 13:39:20 Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Off-list] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board O

Re: [CentOS] [Off-list] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-12 Thread Steve Huff
On Aug 12, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Ian Murray wrote: > If anybody feels they must send complaints, execute personal > vendettas, issue death threats, etc please do it off-list. actually, enforcing community norms in public is useful and important. an off-list message educates only the recipient, w

Re: [CentOS] OT: Firefox SSL error on Linux, Firefox OK on Windows - same web site

2009-08-12 Thread Johnny Hughes
Lanny Marcus wrote: > Using CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) on my Desktop with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.12. > With one web site (LinkShare) I am getting an SSL error, after > clicking to get a more advanced report I do not get that error, using > Mozilla Firefox 3.0.13 on M$ Windows and I get the report OK on > Wi

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-12 Thread Johnny Hughes
Ian Murray wrote: > This applies to 5.X as it stands, as 4.X. Once RH 5.4 hits the streets, > then CentOS 5 users will be in the same boat. I would hope nobody feels > they are getting beaten up about this. The intention is not to beat > anybody up. Anyway, I am going to try *really* hard not to p

[CentOS] OT: Firefox SSL error on Linux, Firefox OK on Windows - same web site

2009-08-12 Thread Lanny Marcus
Using CentOS 5.3 (32 bit) on my Desktop with Mozilla Firefox 3.0.12. With one web site (LinkShare) I am getting an SSL error, after clicking to get a more advanced report I do not get that error, using Mozilla Firefox 3.0.13 on M$ Windows and I get the report OK on Windows. It appears, when using

Re: [CentOS] [Off-list] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-12 Thread Niki Kovacs
Ian Murray a écrit : > Okay, I stand corrected. Not new to the net, though... and I know > threading is not done per subject. I just don't use lists that much and > I definitely don't use threading. Fifteen years of internet emailing and > you're the first to complain. Guess it's never too lat

Re: [CentOS] [Off-list] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-12 Thread Ian Murray
Off-list reply sent. If anybody feels they must send complaints, execute personal vendettas, issue death threats, etc please do it off-list. Otherwise that would definitely be thread hijacking. :o) From: Mike A. Harris To: CentOS mailing list Sent: Wednesda

Re: [CentOS] [Off-list] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-12 Thread Mike A. Harris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ian Murray wrote: > Okay, I stand corrected. Not new to the net, though... and I know > threading is not done per subject. I just don't use lists that much and > I definitely don't use threading. Fifteen years of internet emailing and > you're the fir

Re: [CentOS] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-12 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 08/12/2009 09:38 AM, Ian Murray wrote: > Thanks for the response. Unfortunately /dev/hda was unavailable after I tried > that. The disks on my HP machines show up as /dev/sda when I boot with hda=noprobe hdc=noprobe. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department Gamle Carlsberg

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure

2009-08-12 Thread Ian Murray
This applies to 5.X as it stands, as 4.X. Once RH 5.4 hits the streets, then CentOS 5 users will be in the same boat. I would hope nobody feels they are getting beaten up about this. The intention is not to beat anybody up. Anyway, I am going to try *really* hard not to post on the matter again

Re: [CentOS] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board

2009-08-12 Thread Ian Murray
Thanks for the response. Unfortunately /dev/hda was unavailable after I tried that. From: Mogens Kjaer To: CentOS mailing list Sent: Wednesday, 12 August, 2009 6:29:16 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board On 08/12/2009 01:34 AM, Ian Murray wr