On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 13:34 +0800, cjzjm100 wrote:
> I had updated by yum,however alway received the same result.
> The result was:
> filelists.xml.gz | 1.0 MB 00:15
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in ?
>
I had updated by yum,however alway received the same result.
The result was:
filelists.xml.gz | 1.0 MB 00:15
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in ?
yummain.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
File "/usr/shar
2009/5/12 mcclnx mcc :
>
> We are tried to count how many files belong to certain group. Our system
> administrator told us "non-owner" can easy change file group name to another.
> I have been tried several combination and never successful (only ROOT can
> change file group to other name).
>
>
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
> The eighties called - they want their stone-age way to handle disks
> back
Heh. Well, if he wants them fsck'd in the first place ...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.c
Hello:
I posted this to the subversion list yesterday and have
not received a reponse. I am hoping someone on this
list will be able to help me.
I have a CentOS 5 server running subversion 1.5.6-0.2.el5.rf
installed using yum from the rpmforge repository.
I am using svnsync to mirror from anoth
I recently enabled yum-updatesd on two identical servers and configured
it to notify me of updates via e-mail.
This worked fine to start with and it notified me on both machines when
the kernel-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5.x86_64.rpm update was released last week.
However, today I realised that yum-update
>
> We run CentOS 5.3 on 2970's and NF500 III's, all were 5.2 but are now 5.3
> and all running ok?
>
>
> --
> -- -
> Iain Morris
> iain.t.mor...@gmail.com
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:52, Manuel Monteiro
wrote:
>> # Reconnect policy: hard (default) will retry connecting to
>> # the software with exponential backoff, soft will fail
>> # immediately.
>> #bind_policy hard
>
> As far as I remember we are using soft because system would take to long
>
May 15 14:14:07 twittle winbindd[2635]: [2009/05/15 14:14:07, 0]
nsswitch/idmap.c:idmap_init(772)
May 15 14:14:07 twittle winbindd[2635]: ERROR: Initialization failed
for alloc backend tdb, deferred!
May 15 14:14:07 twittle winbindd[2598]: [2009/05/15 14:14:07, 0]
nsswitch/winbindd_passdb.c:sid
We have not had issues with our 2950s running 5.3.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:33 AM, nate wrote:
> Kian Sin Teo wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Any one experience issue with Dell 2950 and CentOS 5.3,
>
> Not 5.3, but 5.2, and it works fine. 5.3 is very similar to
> 5.2 so I wouldn't expect any differences
On: Thu, 14 May 2009 13:00:09 -0700, Scott Silva
wrote:
>
> http://packages.sw.be/fail2ban/
>
Thank you, got it.
In the meantime I revised my existing iptables rules to throttle
connections to ssh, pop3, imap and ftp (which service is not running
in any case).
Thanks for all the help from every
nate wrote:
> Manuel Monteiro wrote:
>
>> bind_policy soft
>
> try changing the policy to hard from soft and see if that helps
>
> # Reconnect policy: hard (default) will retry connecting to
> # the software with exponential backoff, soft will fail
> # immediately.
> #bind_policy hard
>
As fa
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Anthony Kamau wrote:
> Morning list!
>
> I have a situation that was brought about by a system crash during a yum
> update. The motherboard suffered a catastrophic failure due to busted
> CAPS. Lucky for me (or so I thought at the time), I had a spare,
> identical motherboard as the one that fail
Kian Sin Teo wrote:
> Hi all,
> Any one experience issue with Dell 2950 and CentOS 5.3,
Not 5.3, but 5.2, and it works fine. 5.3 is very similar to
5.2 so I wouldn't expect any differences as far as your
issue is concerned.
You running the latest RAID and BIOS firmware versions?
If it's not even
Manuel Monteiro wrote:
> bind_policy soft
try changing the policy to hard from soft and see if that helps
# Reconnect policy: hard (default) will retry connecting to
# the software with exponential backoff, soft will fail
# immediately.
#bind_policy hard
nate
__
Hi all,
Any one experience issue with Dell 2950 and CentOS 5.3,
I face some issue like this, server install alright. Keep it in production
for a while, Done an update one the server. Reboot , It said no boot devices
found. Check on the perc6/i controller the both harddisk show online and
optimal. U
Hi,
This email is a follow-up to my previous email about "Postfix: user
unknown", perhaps these are related.
Every time I restart openldap i get an error message from nscd:
---
May 15 14:53:02 mail nscd: nss_ldap: could not search LDAP server - Server
is unavailable
---
This is due t
Morning list!
I have a situation that was brought about by a system crash during a yum
update. The motherboard suffered a catastrophic failure due to busted
CAPS. Lucky for me (or so I thought at the time), I had a spare,
identical motherboard as the one that failed. I replaced the dud board
an
Bart Baars napsal(a):
> Looks like I am running into this
> (http://issues.outoforder.cc/view.php?id=87) bug..
>
>
> I am proxy'ing Zimbra with Apache. It looks like Apache is also talking HTTPS
> to Zimbra, but it shouldn't do that :(
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bart
We are proxing a lot of sites. Make
Looks like I am running into this (http://issues.outoforder.cc/view.php?id=87)
bug..
I am proxy'ing Zimbra with Apache. It looks like Apache is also talking HTTPS
to Zimbra, but it shouldn't do that :(
Cheers,
Bart
- "David Hrbáč" wrote:
> From: "David Hrbáč"
> To: "CentOS mailing lis
Bart Baars napsal(a):
> Thanks David,
>
> That worked! Had some conflicts with cups-libs, but overruling the dependency
> will hopefully not damage to much ;)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bart
Well :o) it looks like I have to rebuild the repo :o). I'm gonna look at it.
David
___
Thanks David,
That worked! Had some conflicts with cups-libs, but overruling the dependency
will hopefully not damage to much ;)
Cheers,
Bart
- "David Hrbáč" wrote:
> From: "David Hrbáč"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Friday, 15 May, 2009 15:01:59 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Be
Bart Baars napsal(a):
> Hi All,
>
> Is anyone using mod_gnutls on CentOS 5.3 x64?
>
> A while ago there was a rpm in the CentOs-testing repo, but it disappeared..
> so does anyone have a recent version?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bart
Hi Bart,
I do
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-tls/stable/i386/repovi
Hi All,
Is anyone using mod_gnutls on CentOS 5.3 x64?
A while ago there was a rpm in the CentOs-testing repo, but it disappeared.. so
does anyone have a recent version?
Cheers,
Bart
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/ma
Hi!
I suggest another software, OSSEC (http://www.ossec.net/).
It's more complete (and complex) than fail2ban.
Regards,
--
William
--
Prognus Software Livre
http://www.prognus.com.br
2009/5/15 Robert Heller
> At Thu, 14 May 2009 13:00:09 -0700 CentOS maili
On May 14, 2009, at 23:36, nate wrote:
> hmm, is your package selection particularly complex? In my case
> I list hundreds of packages in my %packages section I don't have
> groups and stuff. I assume your using a stock CentOS install
> and you didn't put any of your own 3rd party rpms in the inst
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 02:03:32PM -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5-14-2009 1:24 PM Pasi ??? spake the following:
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
> >> Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
> >> typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
28 matches
Mail list logo
