On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> For Flash-streaming, there's Red5 (which a couple of customers are using)
>
> Anything else, I'd consider QSS (the commercial cousin of DSS, available
> on OSX-Server, only, IIRC).
> If you outgrow that, there are commercial solutions from SUN (in the
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Guy Boisvert schrieb:
>
>> Does anybody knows something that would do using CentOS ? Any good idea
>> will be appreciated !
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> For Flash-streaming, there's Red5 (which a couple of customers are using)
>
> Anything else, I'd consider QSS (the commerc
tblader wrote:
> The system is an Asus m2n-e mainboard, amd x2 6400, 8 gig of ram.
> It's got and LSI 8704 ELP raid card, a couple of realtek gig nics
> and SATA dvd drive.
My home desktop machine is an M2N-E Mobo, and works fine with the LiveCD.
[r...@chamkaur ~]# dmidecode | grep -i m2n-e
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Am 17.03.2009 um 21:19 schrieb Per Qvindesland:
>
>
>> No as I said it does not have all the synchronizing stuff but rock
>> solid
>> email server, sadly Zimbra in my humble opinion not really free, but
>> of
>> course there is http://www.opengroupware.org/ http://www
on 3-17-2009 3:53 PM Les Mikesell spake the following:
> Rainer Duffner wrote:
>> All the "free" solutions depend on you spending an extra-ordinary
>> amount of time configuring them.
>
> Well, except SME server where you just add users in a web interface.
> But as mentioned, it's Centos4 based
Russ Lavoy wrote:
> I noticed that CentOS 5.2 does not have the following updates listed in the
> repository.
>
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0264.html
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0333.html
>
> Is this something that is coming soon?
>
yes, they should come through sho
> Where are these rpms? I could only find a tar file.
Untar the file, a new directory will be created with the RPMS.
Zimbra comes as a bundle with its own ldap server, mysql server,
clamav, etc. it is difficult or impossible to "update" one of those
services , you have to wait for the next zimbra
Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
> All the "free" solutions depend on you spending an extra-ordinary
> amount of time configuring them.
Well, except SME server where you just add users in a web interface.
But as mentioned, it's Centos4 based unless you use the beta version and
it doesn't do network au
Am 17.03.2009 um 21:19 schrieb Per Qvindesland:
> No as I said it does not have all the synchronizing stuff but rock
> solid
> email server, sadly Zimbra in my humble opinion not really free, but
> of
> course there is http://www.opengroupware.org/ http://www.citadel.org/
> http://www.open-xc
tblader wrote:
> On 03/17/2009 02:38 PM, Martin Suehowicz wrote:
>
>> Try upgrading to the latest kernel.
>>
>
> Hi,
> I believe I've got the latest already:
>
> uname -a
> Linux ofdmz.localdomain 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST
> 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
>
My f
On 03/17/2009 02:38 PM, Martin Suehowicz wrote:
> Try upgrading to the latest kernel.
Hi,
I believe I've got the latest already:
uname -a
Linux ofdmz.localdomain 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST
2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
--
Flambeau Inc. Technology Center - Baraboo, WI
Well if you want to install QMT in a snap (about 30 minuts and no various
scripts install) then download the full iso with centos in the bottom and
really simple configuration steps from here http://qmtiso.com/
Regards
Per Qvindesland
On 3/17/09 9:14 PM, "Dnk" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 17-Mar-09
No as I said it does not have all the synchronizing stuff but rock solid
email server, sadly Zimbra in my humble opinion not really free, but of
course there is http://www.opengroupware.org/ http://www.citadel.org/
http://www.open-xchange.com/EN/developer/index.html and http://kolab.org to
mention
Am 17.03.2009 um 20:58 schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>
> Where are these rpms? I could only find a tar file.
>
The pay-version is RPM.
But everything (except for the startup-script, the user it creates and
possibly other small bits I'm too lazy to lookup ATM) installs under /
opt/zimbra anyway.
On 17-Mar-09, at 1:07 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Per Qvindesland wrote:
>> If your not to picky on calendar sharing and the other sharing
>> options I can
>> really recommend Qmailtoaster http://qmailtoaster.com/, rock solid
>> piece of
>> mail server with a really good web admin inter
Am 17.03.2009 um 20:56 schrieb Scott Silva:
> on 3-17-2009 12:44 PM Per Qvindesland spake the following:
>> If your not to picky on calendar sharing and the other sharing
>> options I can
>> really recommend Qmailtoaster http://qmailtoaster.com/, rock solid
>> piece of
>> mail server with a r
Per Qvindesland wrote:
> If your not to picky on calendar sharing and the other sharing options I can
> really recommend Qmailtoaster http://qmailtoaster.com/, rock solid piece of
> mail server with a really good web admin interface and a second to none
> support.
>
AH yes, Daniel's qmail. But
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I really need to either upgrade my Scalix server or replace it.
>
> It has to be:
>
> Free
> Integrated with anti-spam
> IPv6 support
> optional anti-virus (processing concerns)
>
> I don't have to be able to port mail from the Scalix to the new server.
> Everyone can
Tim Nelson wrote:
> - "Robert Moskowitz" wrote:
>
>> I really need to either upgrade my Scalix server or replace it.
>>
>> It has to be:
>>
>> Free
>> Integrated with anti-spam
>> IPv6 support
>> optional anti-virus (processing concerns)
>>
>> I don't have to be able to port mail from the S
on 3-17-2009 12:44 PM Per Qvindesland spake the following:
> If your not to picky on calendar sharing and the other sharing options I can
> really recommend Qmailtoaster http://qmailtoaster.com/, rock solid piece of
> mail server with a really good web admin interface and a second to none
> support
If your not to picky on calendar sharing and the other sharing options I can
really recommend Qmailtoaster http://qmailtoaster.com/, rock solid piece of
mail server with a really good web admin interface and a second to none
support.
Regards
Per Qvindesland
On 3/17/09 8:24 PM, "Robert Moskowitz"
Try upgrading to the latest kernel.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of tblader
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:05 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] syslog: CPU stuck for 10s!
Hi All,
I have a Centos 5 box serving
- "Robert Moskowitz" wrote:
> I really need to either upgrade my Scalix server or replace it.
>
> It has to be:
>
> Free
> Integrated with anti-spam
> IPv6 support
> optional anti-virus (processing concerns)
>
> I don't have to be able to port mail from the Scalix to the new
> server.
> E
I really need to either upgrade my Scalix server or replace it.
It has to be:
Free
Integrated with anti-spam
IPv6 support
optional anti-virus (processing concerns)
I don't have to be able to port mail from the Scalix to the new server.
Everyone can just POP their mail.
I have read a bit abou
2009/3/17 Tru Huynh :
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:36:28AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> They did. I can load the web pages from centos.org again. :-) Thanks
>> to everyone on the list who helped and also to the person at Layered
>> Tech who eliminated the glitch!
>
>
> ...
> It looks like there
Guy Boisvert schrieb:
>
> Does anybody knows something that would do using CentOS ? Any good idea
> will be appreciated !
>
>
For Flash-streaming, there's Red5 (which a couple of customers are using)
Anything else, I'd consider QSS (the commercial cousin of DSS, available
on OSX-Server, on
Hello
I have previously used Centos 4.x in runlevel 3, when I plug in my usb
storage device/cd in cd-rom, it is shown under /media, for example
/media/MyUsbStick.
Now in Centos 5.2, when I insert usb storage device, nothing is shown
under /media (runlevel 3). When I have runlevel 5 and X running,
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:30 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
Update:
removed firefox and flash via yumex.
removed the ~/.mozilla folder completely and started afresh.
re-installed firefox - i386 version on a x86_64 system as this seem to
be the safest and it wo
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:30 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
P.S.
$ rpm -qa|grep fire
firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i386
--
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090317/e24d3120/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:02:33 +0100
From: Tru Huynh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:03
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:30 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
> Update:
> removed firefox and flash via yumex.
> removed the ~/.mozilla folder completely and started afresh.
> re-installed firefox - i386 version on a x86_64 system as this seem to
> be the safest and it works fine at home.
> all appear
Thiago Avelino wrote:
> VLS = http://www.videolan.org/doc/streaming-howto/en/
>
> 2009/3/17 Gilbert Sebenste :
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am a noob to streaming video, and I have a file I'd like to stream (a
>> .wmv file...sorry. ;-) ). In any case, how can I do this on my website
>> using Centos 5.2
Chris Geldenhuis wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > It is this time of year again: CentOS is going to Linuxtag 2009 (well,
> > at least we will try to get a booth there). If you want to be part of
> > the team there, stay tuned for news here in centos-pr...@centos.org.
>
> As it happens I have a t
Rob Kampen wrote:
Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully
current CentOS x86_64.
Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have
[rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash
flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386
[rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire
firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i38
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Cheers.
>
> It is this time of year again: CentOS is going to Linuxtag 2009 (well,
> at least we will try to get a booth there). If you want to be part of
> the team there, stay tuned for news here in centos-pr...@centos.org.
>
> Deadline for the projects is 24th of march (
> Could you please provide a description of the components in the system
> you are trying to boot it in?
> Do you have at least 256-512 MB of RAM?
Hi,
The CD/DVD image was downloaded from mirrors.gigenet:
http://mirrors.gigenet.com/centos/5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-LiveCD.iso
The system is an
From: Thiago Avelino
> VLS = http://www.videolan.org/doc/streaming-howto/en/
> 2009/3/17 Gilbert Sebenste :
> > I am a noob to streaming video, and I have a file I'd like to stream (a
> > .wmv file...sorry. ;-) ). In any case, how can I do this on my website
> > using Centos 5.2 and Apache 2.2.8
Hi All,
I have a Centos 5 box serving NFS3 shares from an LSI megaraid card.
The box has been up and down for about a week and trying to figure
out what's up. Found a syslog message today about "APIC error on CPU"
and after rebooting with NOAPIC, I now get this:
# cat /var/log/kernel | grep BUG
VLS = http://www.videolan.org/doc/streaming-howto/en/
2009/3/17 Gilbert Sebenste :
> Hello all,
>
> I am a noob to streaming video, and I have a file I'd like to stream (a
> .wmv file...sorry. ;-) ). In any case, how can I do this on my website
> using Centos 5.2 and Apache 2.2.8, rather than mak
Hello all,
I am a noob to streaming video, and I have a file I'd like to stream (a
.wmv file...sorry. ;-) ). In any case, how can I do this on my website
using Centos 5.2 and Apache 2.2.8, rather than making people download a
20 MB video? Can someone point me to some URL's and some software?
2009/3/17 Russ Lavoy :
>
> I noticed that CentOS 5.2 does not have the following updates listed in the
> repository.
>
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0264.html
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0333.html
>
> Is this something that is coming soon?
They should come in CentOS 5.3
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:36:28AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> They did. I can load the web pages from centos.org again. :-) Thanks
> to everyone on the list who helped and also to the person at Layered
> Tech who eliminated the glitch!
...
It looks like there may be a probelm with an offsite (
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>> webmaster should happen to read this...
>
> working fine
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> 2009/3/17 Tru Huynh :
e and that I will
>>> post here and ask one of the CentOS team with Administrative
>>> privileges for that server to contact them for support.
>>
>> I have opened a ticket pointing back to this thread at the hoster.
>>
>
I noticed that CentOS 5.2 does not have the following updates listed in the
repository.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0264.html
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0333.html
Is this something that is coming soon?
Thanks!
___
Ce
2009/3/17 Tru Huynh :
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:23:47AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Lanny Marcus
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> Proxy Server that is anonymous. But doing another trace to layeredtech
>> >> and ltdomains shows bad hops also from my end just like John Pier
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:23:47AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Lanny Marcus
> wrote:
>
> >> Proxy Server that is anonymous. But doing another trace to layeredtech
> >> and ltdomains shows bad hops also from my end just like John Pierces
> >> shows. But still I c
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:20 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> JohnS wrote:
> > Something fishey going on here! You can send an email to @centos.org but
> > not www??
>
> Sure. The mailserver is nowhere near to the web server. Okay, same
> continent, but completely different DC.
>
> Ralph
Ahh, o
Cheers.
It is this time of year again: CentOS is going to Linuxtag 2009 (well,
at least we will try to get a booth there). If you want to be part of
the team there, stay tuned for news here in centos-pr...@centos.org.
Deadline for the projects is 24th of march (short call!), I will try to
apply s
JohnS wrote:
> Something fishey going on here! You can send an email to @centos.org but
> not www??
Sure. The mailserver is nowhere near to the web server. Okay, same
continent, but completely different DC.
Ralph
pgpWxCQ2W0tYw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> Proxy Server that is anonymous. But doing another trace to layeredtech
>> and ltdomains shows bad hops also from my end just like John Pierces
>> shows. But still I can access it by WWW.
I sent an email to support AT layeredtech DOT com g
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:05 AM, JohnS wrote:
>> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> > Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my
>> > wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run
>> > into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in
>> > Colom
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:05 AM, JohnS wrote:
>> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> > Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my
>> > wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run
>> > into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in
>> > Colom
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my
>> wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run
>> into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in
>> Colomb
54 matches
Mail list logo
