>Right now I only have to do this for VMWare's drivers, I
>build custom RPMs of the drivers and the tools and push
>them out when I push out a new kernel so I don't need to
>worry about this kind of thing.
That's a cool idea...
Care to share those two spec files? :)
jlc
___
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Craig White wrote:
> did you 'relabel' the entire filesystem? - that's pretty much necessary
> if you've been running the system without having SELinux running, at
> least in permissive mode.
SELinux had been running in permissive. I did not disable during
install
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 12:00 +0800, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> Spinning off from the other thread about SELinux, I just tried to
> re-enable SELinux on my personal server hosting just email and forum
> for a small local community.
>
> Average load for this Intel Core 2 Duo box with 2GB of ram (usua
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 23:03 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
> >
> > vi /etc/init.d
> >
> > cahnge the number 5 to 3
> >
> > reboot
> >
> > fix driver
> >
> > change the 3 to 5
> >
> > reboot
> >
> > enjoy
> >
> Ed,
>
> I was hoping to find an "automated" solution.
>
> Some way to execute the compile
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I was hoping to find an "automated" solution.
For these sorts of things, I compile the driver on a test
system and push it out simultaneously with the new kernel.
Right now I only have to do this for VMWare's drivers, I
build custom RPMs of the drivers and the tools and push
>
> vi /etc/init.d
>
> cahnge the number 5 to 3
>
> reboot
>
> fix driver
>
> change the 3 to 5
>
> reboot
>
> enjoy
>
Ed,
I was hoping to find an "automated" solution.
Some way to execute the compile before X is started.
I am already detecting a kernel change and recompiles selected needed
m
Spinning off from the other thread about SELinux, I just tried to
re-enable SELinux on my personal server hosting just email and forum
for a small local community.
Average load for this Intel Core 2 Duo box with 2GB of ram (usually
with some 1GB free) was generally below 0.4 for the last 24hrs,
av
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> Real world example -> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9176
>
> SELinux stopped a mambo exploit from compromising the system. For LAMP
> systems, selinux and mod_security are pretty much a requirement for a
> secure setup.
Thanks for the link
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Jim Wildman wrote:
> There are VERY definitive benefits to running SELinux. The best
> description I've found is that it is like an iron cage on the inside of
> a window. Even if something gets past the glass, its still inside a
> window. I've had SELinux stop ex
oops vi /etc.inittab init.d is a directory
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Ed Donahue wrote:
> vi /etc/init.d
>
> cahnge the number 5 to 3
>
> reboot
>
> fix driver
>
> change the 3 to 5
>
> reboot
>
> enjoy
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>> hi all
>>
>> is there a way/me
vi /etc/init.d
cahnge the number 5 to 3
reboot
fix driver
change the 3 to 5
reboot
enjoy
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> hi all
>
> is there a way/method to compile an X11 driver at boot before X starts???
>
> Seems like the ATI catalyst driver (after a kernel change) do
hi all
is there a way/method to compile an X11 driver at boot before X starts???
Seems like the ATI catalyst driver (after a kernel change) does not
start correctly and locks up the box
I need to recompile the driver after udev and before X. How is this done?
Jerry
_
Am 06.03.2009 um 00:58 schrieb Joshua Baker-LePain:
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 at 12:55am, Rainer Duffner wrote
>
>> Am 05.03.2009 um 23:06 schrieb Nigel Kendrick:
>>
>>> Can anyone with a well-connected crystal ball suggest a timeframe
>>> for an
>>> IA64 release of CentOS 5? Weeks? Months? Never?
>
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 at 12:55am, Rainer Duffner wrote
>
>> Am 05.03.2009 um 23:06 schrieb Nigel Kendrick:
>>
>>> Can anyone with a well-connected crystal ball suggest a timeframe for an
>>> IA64 release of CentOS 5? Weeks? Months? Never?
>>
>> If you can afford an IA64-bo
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 at 12:55am, Rainer Duffner wrote
> Am 05.03.2009 um 23:06 schrieb Nigel Kendrick:
>
>> Can anyone with a well-connected crystal ball suggest a timeframe for an
>> IA64 release of CentOS 5? Weeks? Months? Never?
>
> If you can afford an IA64-box, you can also afford the RHEL lic
Am 05.03.2009 um 23:06 schrieb Nigel Kendrick:
Can anyone with a well-connected crystal ball suggest a timeframe
for an IA64 release of CentOS 5? Weeks? Months? Never?
Thanks
Nigel Kendrick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.ce
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:34 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 3-5-2009 2:06 PM Nigel Kendrick spake the following:
> > Can anyone with a well-connected crystal ball suggest a timeframe for an
> > IA64 release of CentOS 5? Weeks? Months? Never?
> >
> There has not been a lot of support for other arc
on 3-5-2009 2:06 PM Nigel Kendrick spake the following:
> Can anyone with a well-connected crystal ball suggest a timeframe for an
> IA64 release of CentOS 5? Weeks? Months? Never?
>
There has not been a lot of support for other arches besides x86-64 and i386
up to now. Not sure if it is the hard
Can anyone with a well-connected crystal ball suggest a timeframe for an
IA64 release of CentOS 5? Weeks? Months? Never?
Thanks
Nigel Kendrick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Noob Centos Admin
wrote:
> Just my noob opinion, that if there's no practical and definitive
> benefit from enabling SELinux, for the time being until it is matured,
> the best thing to do is just set it to off. Otherwise, it just
> generally causes trouble and run
on 3-5-2009 12:03 PM Noob Centos Admin spake the following:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Scott Silva
> wrote:
>
>> Learn to use a file editor and edit the configs yourself. That is the only
>> way
>> to have the best control.
>
> That's generally how I try to do things, except sometimes h
> there still doesnt seem to be a 64bit java plugin
>
Wrong. There _is_ an official java plugin for 64 bits linux. It's a new
feature in JRE 6u12. Check www.java.com
Regards.
German
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mai
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> Just my noob opinion, that if there's no practical and definitive
> benefit from enabling SELinux, for the time being until it is matured,
> the best thing to do is just set it to off. Otherwise, it just
> generally causes trouble and runs up tons of
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
> Learn to use a file editor and edit the configs yourself. That is the only way
> to have the best control.
That's generally how I try to do things, except sometimes hand
"written" doesn't work the way I expect it to. Then I'd like to have a
GU
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Chuck Campbell wrote:
> Do I need to start over with a clean install again, and how do I avoid this
> problem the next time I try to run updates after the install?
Just my noob opinion, that if there's no practical and definitive
benefit from enabling SELinux, for
on 2-23-2009 10:53 AM Noob Centos Admin spake the following:
> Everytime I have to setup samba to handle Windows users, sometime
> inadvertently goes wrong or doesn't work the way I expected, or takes
> forever to setup, especially when there are many users and various
> policies. So far, the easie
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> You can specify multiple forwarders if you have more than one server
> already set up the way you want. Named will find one that works and
> cache the results locally for its time to live. Once you have a couple
> of robust boxes configured i
Thanks Anne,
I look forward to what you com up with.
roger
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 05 March 2009 12:26:21 Roger Wells wrote:
>
>>> As I wrote elsewhere, it doesn't need to be so bleeding edge. I have a
>>> stock 5.2 install. My Photosmart 7180 was not supported. I downloaded
>>> th
On Thursday 05 March 2009 12:26:21 Roger Wells wrote:
> > As I wrote elsewhere, it doesn't need to be so bleeding edge. I have a
> > stock 5.2 install. My Photosmart 7180 was not supported. I downloaded
> > the relevant .ppd and pointed CUPS and hplip to it, and printing worked
> > after that.
>
ze: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090305/302b356b/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:32:57 +0100
From: Tru Huynh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0340 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_
Paul Bijnens wrote:
> On 2009-03-05 09:21, Ondrej Filip wrote:
>> Who makes packages for centos? Or who makes decisions about it?
>>
>> Hope it's not dummy question.
>>
Ondrej: Please don't top-post.
>> On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:08:35 -0800, Ian Forde wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 07:59 +0100, O
John Kennedy wrote:
> I am trying to make a custom install CD for CentOS 5.2. I am building
> the iso in a VirtualBox image and testing the iso in another VirtualBox
> image so I don't keep wasting CD's.
Why are you rebuilding the installer ? why not just use the CentOS
installer and use your ow
David Hrbáč wrote:
> there's nothing to patch unless we provide some info on packages that we
> can extract from and finally build updateinfo.xml.gz. So as the majority
> of CentOS community knows nothing about how packages are produced and
> how CESA are produced, we do not have CESA RRS feed, we
Arturo Fatturi wrote:
> Friends of CentOs mailing list.
>
> I need some advice from you.
>
> The xfce 4 panel disapear. In fact I can acess all of xfce (by clicking
> with mouse) but if I minimize the window it disapear. I make a uninstall
> and reinstall from yum. Nothing change.
you could
Alexander Farber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have a mixed environment at work: CentOS + Win2003 servers.
> The Win2k3 part contains: AD, DNS (inlc. dyndns), DHCP, DFS, Exchange.
> The CentOS part: NIS passwords + also a DNS server.
>
> So currently we have to update the Linux DNS server
> zone infos b
Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
>
> yum security does not work on CentOS, has been said quite a few times
> already.
>
> patches welcome.
>
Karanbir,
there's nothing to patch unless we provide some info on packages that we
can extract from and finally build updateinfo.xml.gz. So as the majority
of C
Friends of CentOs mailing list.
I need some advice from you.
The xfce 4 panel disapear. In fact I can acess all of xfce (by clicking with
mouse) but if I minimize the window it disapear. I make a uninstall and
reinstall from yum. Nothing change.
Best wishes.
Arturo
Brazil, South
___
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 05 March 2009 12:00:53 Roger Wells wrote:
>
>> thanks for the reply.
>> I had no trouble on RHEL4 installing a version of HPLIP that supported
>> my printers (LJ 4350n & Photosmart C6180)
>> These are not new printers. I really think that CentOS 5.2 could be a
On Thursday 05 March 2009 12:00:53 Roger Wells wrote:
> thanks for the reply.
> I had no trouble on RHEL4 installing a version of HPLIP that supported
> my printers (LJ 4350n & Photosmart C6180)
> These are not new printers. I really think that CentOS 5.2 could be a
> little more bleeding edge.
>
thanks for the reply.
I had no trouble on RHEL4 installing a version of HPLIP that supported
my printers (LJ 4350n & Photosmart C6180)
These are not new printers. I really think that CentOS 5.2 could be a
little more bleeding edge.
Mark Pryor wrote:
>
>
> --- On Wed, 3/4/09, Roger Wells wrote:
I found this useful...
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd316373.aspx
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Alexander Farber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have a mixed environment at work: CentOS + Win2003 servers.
> The Win2k3 part contains: AD, DNS (inlc. dyndns), DHCP, DFS, Exchange.
> The Cent
On 2009-03-05 09:21, Ondrej Filip wrote:
> Who makes packages for centos? Or who makes decisions about it?
>
> Hope it's not dummy question.
>
> On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:08:35 -0800, Ian Forde wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 07:59 +0100, Ondrej Filip wrote:
>>> I asked on Saturday and I didn't get
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 09:21 +0100, Ondrej Filip wrote:
> Who makes packages for centos? Or who makes decisions about it?
>
> Hope it's not dummy question.
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=2
See the section entitled: "CentOS : Community ENTerprise Operating
System"
so if RH
Hello,
we have a mixed environment at work: CentOS + Win2003 servers.
The Win2k3 part contains: AD, DNS (inlc. dyndns), DHCP, DFS, Exchange.
The CentOS part: NIS passwords + also a DNS server.
So currently we have to update the Linux DNS server
zone infos by hand: I export a text file from
Window
Who makes packages for centos? Or who makes decisions about it?
Hope it's not dummy question.
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:08:35 -0800, Ian Forde wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 07:59 +0100, Ondrej Filip wrote:
>> I asked on Saturday and I didn't get reply. I'm trying again.
>>
>> I'm porting one pro
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 07:59 +0100, Ondrej Filip wrote:
> I asked on Saturday and I didn't get reply. I'm trying again.
>
> I'm porting one project to centos where we use gnet and gio libraries. Will
> be these libraries part of centos in future? I'm not sure what relationship
> is between these li
46 matches
Mail list logo
