Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9650SE tuning advice

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:51:40PM -0500, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 18:12, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > > I'm not yet sure if I should be using tgtd or IET (iSCSI Enterprise Target). > > tgtd is already included as a technology preview in RHEL5 (RPM > scsi-target-u

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9650SE tuning advice

On Jan 15, 2009, at 6:12 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 06:04:59PM -0500, Rob Kampen wrote: >> Ray, I've had good performance from xfs with large filesystems. >> What kind of files are you looking to use, lots of smaller files or >> large >> media files?? > > I was leaning

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9650SE tuning advice

Hi, On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 18:12, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > I'm not yet sure if I should be using tgtd or IET (iSCSI Enterprise Target). tgtd is already included as a technology preview in RHEL5 (RPM scsi-target-utils, you can install this one in CentOS 5 as well [this is what you're using, right

Re: [CentOS] Does CentOS 5 support USB 1 ?

MHR wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Russell Bell wrote: We upgraded our Internet server to CentOS 5 from RedHat 4. : The hosts (across the country) tell us CentOS doesn't support USB 1 ! I find this unbelievable. Can anyone set me straight?

Re: [CentOS] Does CentOS 5 support USB 1 ?

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Russell Bell wrote: > We upgraded our Internet server to CentOS 5 from RedHat 4. : > > The hosts (across the country) tell us CentOS doesn't support USB 1 ! > > I find this unbelievable. > > Can anyone set me straight? > I don't have any USB 1 ports on my desktop

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9650SE tuning advice

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 06:04:59PM -0500, Rob Kampen wrote: > Ray, I've had good performance from xfs with large filesystems. > What kind of files are you looking to use, lots of smaller files or large > media files?? I was leaning towards using XFS as well. We'll probably be handling a lot of l

Re: [CentOS] 3Ware 9650SE tuning advice

Ray Van Dolson wrote: Hello fellow sysadmins! I've assembled a whitebox system with a SuperMicro motherboard, case, 8GB of memory and a single quad core Xeon processor. I have two 9650SE-8LPML cards (8 ports each) in each server with 12 1TB SATA drives total. Three drives per "lane" on each

[CentOS] 3Ware 9650SE tuning advice

Hello fellow sysadmins! I've assembled a whitebox system with a SuperMicro motherboard, case, 8GB of memory and a single quad core Xeon processor. I have two 9650SE-8LPML cards (8 ports each) in each server with 12 1TB SATA drives total. Three drives per "lane" on each card. CentOS 5.2 x86_64.

Re: [CentOS] ASUS PT6 or Intel DX58SO for CentOS?

Thanks for the replies. I'll go with the Intel board. This is for a desktop development and test system, so remote management is not a requirement. --Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Squirrel 1.4.8-8.el3.centos.1

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:25:50 +0100 Henk van Lingen wrote: > Since then I have some users who have problems with their sessions. > They are logout out every now and them, and some sent mails have another > user address in the From header. It looks like squirrel is mixing up > sessions? Those users

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 47, Issue 6

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] kickstart over ilo serial port

On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 11:11 +0100, Jure Pečar wrote: > Hello, > > Has anyone managed to redirect output of kickstart install to ILO > serial console? > > I have to test and deploy the remote install with kickstart but have > trouble debugging it because I can't see the output. > For kickstart us

Re: [CentOS] Areca 1220 kernel lockups

William Taylor wrote: > Has anyone experienced any problems with Areca raid cards specifically > the 1220 causing kernels to lock up? > We are running 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5xen on 64bit. We have "areca_cli rsf > info" run once an hour from cron to check > for raid raid issues. Having this running

Re: [CentOS] Squirrel 1.4.8-8.el3.centos.1

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:25:50PM +0100, Henk van Lingen wrote: > > Hi, > > Last tuesday I upgraded squirrelmail on two centos-3 mailservers. > > squirrelmail-1.4.8-8.el3.centos.1, 2.4.21-58.ELsmp, CentOS release 3.9, > httpd 2.0.46 > > Since then I have some users who have problems with their

[CentOS] Squirrel 1.4.8-8.el3.centos.1

Hi, Last tuesday I upgraded squirrelmail on two centos-3 mailservers. squirrelmail-1.4.8-8.el3.centos.1, 2.4.21-58.ELsmp, CentOS release 3.9, httpd 2.0.46 Since then I have some users who have problems with their sessions. They are logout out every now and them, and some sent mails have another

Re: [CentOS] Does CentOS 5 support USB 1 ?

On Wednesday 14 January 2009 3:34:41 pm Russell Bell wrote: > We upgraded our Internet server to CentOS 5 from RedHat 4. > Now we can't use the USB port. dmesg returns: > > usbcore: deregistering driver usb-storage > Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... > usbcore: registered new driver usb-stor

Re: [CentOS] upgrade question. - when to reboot

Michael Simpson wrote: > if you really have to have as perfect an uptime as possible then you > can actually patch a running kernel using ksplice > > > > should only be used for critical security updates but useful nonetheless > > mike > ___

Re: [CentOS] After BIND update owner changed and restart failed

Scott Mazur wrote on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:15:52 -0600: > "the server can be configured either to honor the client's intentions or > ignore them. This is done with the statement allow client-updates; or the > statement ignore client-updates;" > > This refers to the client updating its own A record.

Re: [CentOS] upgrade question. - when to reboot

On 1/15/09, Kenneth Burgener wrote: > On 1/9/2009 9:49 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: > If a hard reboot is what you are attempting to avoid, with 'kexec' even > the Linux kernel can be "reloaded" without a hardware reset. This is > convenient if you want to avoid the long system reset time. > > "Kexe

Re: [CentOS] stack overflow

- Original Message > From: Peter Doherty > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:49:40 PM > Subject: [CentOS] stack overflow > > Hi, > > I've got a fileserver that runs Centos 5.2. It's been stable > otherwise stable for maybe a year or more, and now it's crash

[CentOS] kickstart over ilo serial port

Hello, Has anyone managed to redirect output of kickstart install to ILO serial console? I have to test and deploy the remote install with kickstart but have trouble debugging it because I can't see the output. -- Jure Pečar http://jure.pecar.org ___