On 1/9/2009 9:49 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> Brian wrote:
>
>> Is there a list of packages that after update require a reboot, other then
>> kernel?
>>
> For updates other than the kernel, there is almost always an answer
> short of a full reboot. But, finding that answer and being 100%
>
James B. Byrne wrote on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:11:52 -0500 (EST):
> Does anyone have any idea how this change could occur?
There are some security tools that could be configured to reset SUID bits
on files in certain paths with their default templates.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get you
James B. Byrne wrote:
> I noticed that the suid mode was missing and set it with chmod u+s
> /usr/bin/su. Now the permissions are:
>
> $ ll $(which su)
> -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /bin/su
>
> And now su -l works for ordinary users. Thank you very much.
>
> I am certain that I have
Peter Doherty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jan 14 03:06:21 fs2 kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
> at virtual address fc7ff0aa
that makes me think bad ram. Run memtest86 or some other memory tester.
It may take a day or two or three for it to pick up errors.
nate
_
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Peter Doherty
wrote:
> 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 20 09:34:18 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386
> GNU/Linux
Have you tried this with the current kernel for centos5?
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
I noticed that the suid mode was missing and set it with chmod u+s
/usr/bin/su. Now the permissions are:
$ ll $(which su)
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /bin/su
And now su -l works for ordinary users. Thank you very much.
I am certain that I have not been changing file modes in /usr
Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes wrote:
> Centos CSGFS is at this time really outdated compared to current rh
> updates and fixes, is the centos team still giving support to this
> version???.
What are you missing?
GFS-kernel-2.6.9-80.9.el4_7.5.src.rpm is the latest kernel which is
available on ftp.
On Wed Jan 14 17:16:01 UTC 2009, nate centos at linuxpowered.net wrote:
> It's a long shot but check that /bin/su is setuid ?
>
> From a 5.1 system:
>
> -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24060 Mar 21 2007 /bin/su
This is what I have on that host:
# ll /bin/su
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /b
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:34 -0700, Russell Bell wrote:
> We upgraded our Internet server to CentOS 5 from RedHat 4.
> Now we can't use the USB port. dmesg returns:
>
> usbcore: deregistering driver usb-storage
> Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
> usbcore: registered new driver usb-storage
Hi,
I've got a fileserver that runs Centos 5.2. It's been stable
otherwise stable for maybe a year or more, and now it's crashed three
times since Saturday. The first two times the computer was completely
unresponsive, and there was nothing on the console, and nothing in the
logs. I was
We upgraded our Internet server to CentOS 5 from RedHat 4.
Now we can't use the USB port. dmesg returns:
usbcore: deregistering driver usb-storage
Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
usbcore: registered new driver usb-storage
USB Mass Storage support registered.
USB Universal Host Controller
Centos CSGFS is at this time really outdated compared to current rh
updates and fixes, is the centos team still giving support to this
version???.
Best regards
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on 1-14-2009 8:15 AM William L. Maltby spake the following:
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:09 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote:
>> Problem solved! Apparently, something got trashed in the
>> ~/.mozilla/firefox directory(s). After deleting the .mozilla dir,
>> restarted FF and all works as advertized now.
>
William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:09 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote:
>
>> Problem solved! Apparently, something got trashed in the
>> ~/.mozilla/firefox directory(s). After deleting the .mozilla dir,
>> restarted FF and all works as advertized now.
>>
>
> Glad to hear that
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:31:26 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote
> Scott Mazur wrote on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:08:22 -0600:
>
> > AFAIK the DHCP client has no authority to register dynamic dns regardless of
> > how the client machines are configured. It's the DHCP server that decides
> > to
> > update BIND a
Hello,
I can't get NVIDIA nForce Networking Controller working with CentOS 5.2 (HP
Pavilion a6500f Desktop PC)
Any tip will be highly appreciated :-)
Thanks,
Alex.
__
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at gi
Has anyone experienced any problems with Areca raid cards specifically
the 1220 causing kernels to lock up?
We are running 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5xen on 64bit. We have "areca_cli rsf
info" run once an hour from cron to check
for raid raid issues. Having this running seems to cause the box to
loc
James B. Byrne wrote:
> Any ideas as to what might be happening here and how I might fix it?
It's a long shot but check that /bin/su is setuid ?
>From a 5.1 system:
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24060 Mar 21 2007 /bin/su
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentO
I am encountering an odd problem with su. Up until quite recently I was
able to connect to one of my servers (CentOS-5.2) via ssh as an ordinary
user and then, from the shell, perform an $ su -l to obtain root access.
Now when I try to do this I see the following:
$ su -l
Password:
su: incorrect
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Could it be this simple?
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> Can you do this? I have not found the options to get this to happen.
>> So far I have seen how to read the Audio CD and make a directory of WAV
>> files with a control file for later burning to CD, but I want an iso
>>
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Hi,
Would anyone who has prior experience please share me the steps for the
subject?
Many thanks!
[r...@zhu ~]# uname -a
Linux zhu.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686
athlon i386 GNU/Linux
Cheers, Xiaobo
___
CentOS mailing li
Scott Mazur wrote on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:08:22 -0600:
> AFAIK the DHCP client has no authority to register dynamic dns regardless of
> how the client machines are configured. It's the DHCP server that decides to
> update BIND and this can be turned on or off. My guess is your DHCP server is
> co
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:09 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote:
> Problem solved! Apparently, something got trashed in the
> ~/.mozilla/firefox directory(s). After deleting the .mozilla dir,
> restarted FF and all works as advertized now.
Glad to hear that!
Y'know those 'ritas are corrupting influence
Problem solved! Apparently, something got trashed in the
~/.mozilla/firefox directory(s). After deleting the .mozilla dir,
restarted FF and all works as advertized now.
Thanks for the help and suggestions guys...
Sam
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@ce
William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 10:07 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote:
>
>> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Sam Drinkard wrote:
>>>
>>>
After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I >started
seeing some problems,
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 10:07 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote:
>
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Sam Drinkard wrote:
> >
> >>After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I >started
> >> seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a >"back" function on an
Robert wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Sam Drinkard wrote:
>>
>>
>>>After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I >started
>>> seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a >"back" function on any
>>> pages or tabs.
>>>
>>>
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Sam Drinkard wrote:
>
>>After I think the last or next to last update to firefox, I >started
>> seeing some problems, wherein I no longer have a >"back" function on any
>> pages or tabs.
>>
>
> I am running Firefox on CentOS 5.2
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> ann kok schrieb:
>> Hi
>>
>> How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory
>> No need to turn off the machine
>>
>>
>
>
>
> yum install dmidecode
>
And if you need it over a lot of machines, look at ocsinventory-ng which
will send it to a server and database i
ann kok napsal(a):
> Hi
>
> How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory
> No need to turn off the machine
Try lshw.
David Hrbáč
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi
Also have a look in /proc directory another greate way then just dmidecode
if also lspci to view all your pci devices.
Per
On 1/14/09 12:59 PM, "ann kok" wrote:
> Hi
>
> How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory
> No need to turn off the machine
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
>
ann kok schrieb:
> Hi
>
> How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory
> No need to turn off the machine
>
>
yum install dmidecode
Rainer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> Hi
>
> How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory
> No need to turn off the machine
>
> Thank you
Look in /proc or use a tool that sumarize it nicely (sosreport or others)...
And look at the quickspecs documentation of your server.
Even better, use your vendor utilities (if provided)
Look in the /proc directory, use the cat command and read the files in
there, cpuinfo, memory etc ;)
2009/1/14 ann kok
> Hi
>
> How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory
> No need to turn off the machine
>
> Thank you
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GIT/MU/U dpu s: a--
Hi
How can I know the hardware info eg: type of memory
No need to turn off the machine
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
mouss wrote:
> Plant, Dean a écrit :
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I have a requirement for a mail server that only allows email to pass
>> with a particular word in the subject line.
>>
>> Reading the header checks docs for Postfix I thought I may be able
>> to add this rule:
>>
>> !/^Subject: .*dingdong/
Stewart Williams schrieb:
...
> ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> ata1.00: ATA-7: GB0250C8045, HPG1, max UDMA/133
> ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
> ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
> ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> ata2
> nate wrote:
>> Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I tried to install the kernel Red Hat 5.3 x86_64 (2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64)
>>> with the command:
>>>rpm -Uvh kernel-2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64.rpm
>>> but there is problem with dependecy: ecryptfs-util< 44. How to solve
>>> problems with depenc
39 matches
Mail list logo
