Amos Shapira wrote :
> 2008/11/16 Ian Forde :
>> Actually, that's the problem that Red Hat Satellite Server can solve.
>> You can approve packages for deployment. Thus, when provisioning new
>> servers, they get updates from the approved list. And servers are
>> grouped by class. For the free ve
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008, Jun Salen wrote:
>>From what I can see nagios' check_ping monitor executes /bin/ping,
>>in which case you need to make sure /bin/ping is owned by root
>>and is setuid (chmod u+s /bin/ping)
>>
>>nate
>That solved it. Same with file permission with mount, umount, su, and
>ping6
>From what I can see nagios' check_ping monitor executes /bin/ping,
>in which case you need to make sure /bin/ping is owned by root
>and is setuid (chmod u+s /bin/ping)
>
>nate
That solved it. Same with file permission with mount, umount, su, and ping6.
Thank you very much.
Get your new E
On Dec 18, 2008, at 12:24 PM, "John" wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Matt
>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:37 AM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Adding RAM
>>
A bit of bo
On Dec 18, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Matt wrote:
>> That's why I asked what kind of Controler the board had on it in a
>> previous
>> post to you and stated ram was not the suspect problem. IMO if you
>> keeped
>> the dual core proc and just switched to ICH7 Board you would have
>> saved
>> money
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> Hi ALL,
>
> I recently withed from CentOS 3 X server to CentOS 4.5. It works fine
> other than printers.
>
> there are many printers connected to it. We have configured the commnad
>
> printconf
>
> queue type is Networked UNIX (LPD)
>
>
> Some times, we will be able t
> Hi Russel, Are you Bonding the two Broad Com NICs? Can you give us an idea
> speed wise of the performance for NFS? OT, are you doing any Samba testing?
No, we're not bonding the NICs. Roughly, writes on the centos kernel
are about 600K/s on average, and on the stock kernel about 1.3M/s.
These
Dag Wieers wrote:
> But it would be nice if the centos-release package would contain an apt
> configuration file.
easy to drop in, please post a recommended config stanza, into an issue
at bugs.centos.org/ and it can be taken from there.
- KB
___
Cent
> That's why I asked what kind of Controler the board had on it in a previous
> post to you and stated ram was not the suspect problem. IMO if you keeped
> the dual core proc and just switched to ICH7 Board you would have saved
> money. Your utilization rate would probly stayed the same or no highe
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Indunil Jayasooriya
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 2:42 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] Unable to connect to printer;will retry in
> 30 seconds...: Connection ti
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kai Schaetzl
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:18 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed problems with 5.2 and
> 2.6.18-92.1.18 kernelrevision
>
> ArcosCom L
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:37 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Adding RAM
>
> >> A bit of bottle neck.
> >>
> >> Device:rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Indunil Jayasooriya
wrote:
> Hi ALL,
>
>
> When we check logs , we see something like this.
>
> [Job 888] Unable to connect to printer; will retry in 30 seconds...:
> Connection timed out
>
> Then, What we do is , We go to application, system setting, printing
>
>
on 12-18-2008 2:20 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Lanny Marcus
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
>>> wrote:
>>>
> I hope you don't follow the latest trend and blame RPMforge ;-)
>>>
on 12-17-2008 5:42 PM Hal Martin spake the following:
> Just along these lines, would it be possible for me to break RAID 1 on
> the two internal drives into RAID 0 and then mirror that new RAID 0
> array onto a SATA drive using RAID 1 without loosing any data?
>
> I used JFS as the file system fo
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Russell Miller
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 7:03 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] nfs slow?
>
> > Well, you got what you asked for. There's lots of info on
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, cjzjm100 wrote:
> Becaule i heard that the apt was great,i wanted to try it.And when i
> tried to update my system,the yum faid,i installed the apt which came
> from dag repo by yum. After that i did:sudo apt-get update and sudo
> apt-get upgrade.There are some problem and
>> A bit of bottle neck.
>>
>> Device:rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/srkB/swkB/s
>> avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
>> sda 0.38 176.63 70.32 78.26 813.46 2044.82 406.73 1022.41
>> 19.24 0.40 19.17 4.04 60.07
>> sda1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:11 PM, William L. Maltby
wrote:
>>it, Sunday, and it was supposedly OK. Dell wants about US$237 for a
>> new motherboard, delivered to our house. I think I will wait, until I
>> can buy a very low end box, without a monitor, and everything will
>> have a guarantee. I am
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 07:08:52AM -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
> BTW, several years ago when I first started using IPCop, I ran some
> tests. My cable provider was a Road Runner (5Mb/s?). All configurations
> used 10Mb/s ISA ethernet cards of various brands, coaxial cable. Test
Heh, yeah. Whe
Jun Salen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Ping service in Nagios has "unknown" status which was previously OK,
> this happens after i messed up some of the files owner and accidentally
> change it to Apache. Although I restored most of the file permission back to
> Root, the problem above still appears which
cjzjm100 wrote:
After that i found i could not use apt smooth,there were many
problem,so i want to install yum again.But apt couldn't find the yum
package. In /etc/apt/sources.list.d,there are two lists:rpmforge.list
and os.list.
os.list:
uncomment these lines:
#repomd http://mirror.cent
Hi all!
Becaule i heard that the apt was great,i wanted to try it.And when i tried to
update my system,the yum faid,i installed the apt which came from dag repo by
yum. After that i did:sudo apt-get update and sudo apt-get upgrade.There are
some problem and i did as apt suggested:sudo apt-get
ArcosCom Linux User wrote on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:00:29 +0100 (CET):
> The last try:
>1) Power off the laptop along 2/3 hours.
>2) Power on and log into gnome.
>3) The cpuspeed monitor shows that all is working fine.
I don't know what this monitor is. There's a cpuspeed service script.
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 20:11 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> My backup box is an old 200MHz Pentium w/96MB. Maybe there is a local
> dealer or private party that has a good old one you can pick up $Cheap.
>
> When I'm using the old backup with IPCop, I see no performance
> difference. Shoul
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 20:10 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>
> >> I hope you don't follow the latest trend and blame RPMforge ;-)
> >
> > No he has to first blame EPEL, then he can move onto RPMforge :)
>
> I've never used EPEL, so i
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 08:06 +0100, ArcosCom Linux User wrote:
...
> Sorry for my poor english: What is the meaning of "top post"? (spanish
> speaker here).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
There's probably a comparable es... page.
Just google 'netiquette top-post' (no quotes) for much
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Lanny Marcus
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
>> wrote:
>>
I hope you don't follow the latest trend and blame RPMforge ;-)
>>>
>>> No he has to first blame EPEL, then he can move onto RPMforge
ArcosCom Linux User wrote:
> I'll try the new 2.6-92.1.22 kernel too, but in the new kernel changelog
> not appears to be any type of fix that affect to this.
I have seen the same problem on RHEL 5.2 on a ThinkPad T41 too...
cpuspeed stuck at the low-cpu setting. Manually kicking it to something
29 matches
Mail list logo
