Dirk H. Schulz wrote:
Ned,
--On 5. Oktober 2008 11:07:54 +0100 Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're correct in your assumption that this is an SELinux issue. You need
to write a custom policy to allow connection and writing to the socket.
How to do this is covered in the SELinux Wiki
Hi ALL
I'm using vsftpd as FTP server, and I'd like to chroot my FTP users
to their home dir. How can I do it? i.e. "jailing" them in their home
dir...
at the moment I have the following issues the user when they login to
ftp server they go to the main directory /var/ftp/
/etc/passwd
...
sdc:x:5
Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote:
Hi,
I need to know is there a way to upgrade the current version of GNOME
to the newest version ?
--
Sadaruwan Samaraweera
The gnome website has a fair bit of information about it. For the latest
versions for your distro you can visit
http://www.gnome.org/~davyd
Hi,
I need to know is there a way to upgrade the current version of GNOME to the
newest version ?
--
Sadaruwan Samaraweera
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ned,
--On 5. Oktober 2008 11:07:54 +0100 Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dirk H. Schulz wrote:
Hi folks,
I have installed postgrey from the rpmforge repo, but it does not work
well with postfix from CentOS 5.2: I always get the error:
warning: connect to postgrey/socket: Permission den
Hello,
I am sending withconfiguration files and details.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Dougal Ballantyne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi Kapil,
>
> Are you seeing a segfault and also core dump of the automount process?
>
> Dougal Ballantyne
> Axon ITC
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Marc
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 22:10, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I don't agree with you that using 3rd party repositories is not
> advisable. Many 3rd party repositories have very high quality
> standards and man
Tom [toms400] wrote:
> Hi, I'm using Centos 5.2 and trying to use Eclipse's embedded browser
> without success. Could this be due to any of the patches that were
> commented out in 3.2.1-18?
Broken by design:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452113
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpzegu90wsHs.pgp
D
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Maybe Centos want's to try to get a stand.
>>> I would be willing to help man a booth at CeBit
>>
>> I absolutely *hate* CeBit (have you looked at the hotel prices in
>> Hannover during CeBit?). Please take this to centos-promo and if enou
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Maybe Centos want's to try to get a stand.
I would be willing to help man a booth at CeBit
I absolutely *hate* CeBit (have you looked at the hotel prices in
Hannover during CeBit?). Please take this to centos-promo and if enough
people are interested, we really might
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Chris Geldenhuis wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
I absolutely *hate* CeBit (have you looked at the hotel prices in
Hannover during CeBit?). Please take this to centos-promo and if enough
people are interested, we really might try for a booth there.
Last time I went we d
Hi, I'm using Centos 5.2 and trying to use Eclipse's embedded browser without
success. Could this be due to any of the patches that were commented
out in 3.2.1-18?
When trying to use the embedded browser, I get the error: No more
handles (java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no swt-mozilla-gtk-3235 in
James B. Byrne wrote:
> 1. Physically segmenting my LAN
> 2. Having to commission an additional host or reconfigure an existing host
> to multi-homed.
That's the beauty of bridging, *NO* changes are required to
your lan. There are no IP addresses on the firewall's interfaces.
Worst case you can
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM, James B. Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On : Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:50:37 +0200, "Mr Shunz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
> [snip]
>
>>> Presently the setting for rip is:
>>>
>>> router rip
>>> version 2
>>> passive-interface [[FastEthernet]]0/0
>>> net
James B. Byrne wrote:
There is no ia64/ CentOS-5.2
x86_64
The substantive question remains unanswered. Can I install the new disk
drivers for SATA AHCI from the 64 bit CentOS-5.2 boot dvd without having
to reinstall the entire OS or not?
you probably just need to force them into t
> There is no ia64/ CentOS-5.2
x86_64
The substantive question remains unanswered. Can I install the new disk
drivers for SATA AHCI from the 64 bit CentOS-5.2 boot dvd without having
to reinstall the entire OS or not?
Regards,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Jame
James B. Byrne wrote:
> You can accomplish this much easier by simply using
> a firewall. I like OpenBSD firewalls in layer 2
> bridging mode. Put the firewall in-line between the
> router and the rest of the network, no other network
> changes needed.
The difficulty with this is that it requires
Hi Kapil,
Are you seeing a segfault and also core dump of the automount process?
Dougal Ballantyne
Axon ITC
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Marcelo M. Garcia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kapil singh wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Automount is not working well with centos 5.2, but the same is wor
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Chris Geldenhuis wrote:
Didi wrote:
I just read this
http://www.linux-magazine.com/online/news/cebit_open_source_linux_magazine_and_linux_foundation_announce_call_for_projects
Maybe Centos want's to try to get a stand.
I would be willing to help man a
On : Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:50:37 +0200, "Mr Shunz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
[snip]
>> Presently the setting for rip is:
>>
>> router rip
>> version 2
>> passive-interface [[FastEthernet]]0/0
>> network aaa.bbb.ccc.0
>> no auto-summary
>
> is that aaa.bbb.ccc.0 a *public* IP class?
Ye
James B. Byrne wrote:
> I will deal with NAT issues for these hosts at a later time. For now I am
> concerned only with hosts that should not reach or be reached from the
> public Internet in any case and therefore do not need a public IP or NAT.
You can accomplish this much easier by simply usi
>
Thanks guys
really apprecite ur quick response
regards
Faban
> On Mon, October 6, 2008 12:06 pm, fabian dacunha wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> apprecite ur kind help n advice
>>
>> I have a Centos 5 server running only squid for sometime and its workin
>> great.
>> i am concerned about security
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:43, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> so maybe I should disable SELinux
>> and be done with it.
>
> That's what I'd suggest too. SELinux isn't even installed on any
> of the systems I manage(roughly 350). Not worth the trouble.
That's a very bad advice.
SELinux is
Well, in your specific case you could replace it only in files that
are *.c or *.h, you can easily use an additional parameter to "find"
to accomplish that:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:34, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> find . -type f |
> while read fil
> do
> sed -i 's/prog/n
James B. Byrne wrote:
By the time I received this message I had already installed the ia_64
version of CentOS-5.2 with the BIOS set to IDE emulation. If now I change
the BIOS to use RAID then the system cannot see the SATA drive at all.
There is no ia64/ CentOS-5.2
--
Karanbir Singh : http:/
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 22:10, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps you should use a distribution that includes all of the
> packages you need rather than trying to bolt a bunch of
> 3rd party stuff on to CentOS.
Agreed.
> I install a bunch of 3rd party packages myself, though they
> are all
A while ago I sent mail about wanting to find all files that had a certain
text string in it and changing it to something else. People mentioned
that there is a system tool to do it (gnome has it too). I ran this, for
example to find all files WITH "prog" in the name, and then I did a ps
and I s
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hu?
>
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd]$grep -ri virtu conf* | grep -v "#"
> | conf.d/ssl.conf:
> | conf.d/ssl.conf:
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd]$grep -rHi virtu conf* | grep -v "#"
> | conf.d/ssl.conf:
> | conf.d/ssl.conf:
>
Bo Lynch wrote on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:24:59 -0400 (EDT):
> Check out ClamAV. Its free and does the job.
> www.clamav.net/
install via rpmforge.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
__
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had a situation similar to yours. When I had a mix of PATA and
> SATA, I just could not boot the thing. Played with the BIOS settings,
> grub entries such as hd(0,0), etc etc. I finally gave up on it and
> went for lilo
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS-5.0 on HP-ComPaq DC7700 Dual Core
From:"James B. Byrne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Mon, October 6, 2008 12:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "John Newbigin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
MHR wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you are using GNU grep (well, you are using CentOS),
> >
> > grep -ri "foo" dir/to/search/in
> >
> > seems much shorter to me.
> >
>
> Without the -H you don't get the file names
Hu?
| [EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you are using GNU grep (well, you are using CentOS),
>
> grep -ri "foo" dir/to/search/in
>
> seems much shorter to me.
>
Without the -H you don't get the file names
mhr
__
On Mon, October 6, 2008 12:06 pm, fabian dacunha wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> apprecite ur kind help n advice
>
> I have a Centos 5 server running only squid for sometime and its workin
> great.
> i am concerned about security so i have a shorewall firewall on the
> machine runnign squid n works grt
>
>
Dear All,
apprecite ur kind help n advice
I have a Centos 5 server running only squid for sometime and its workin
great.
i am concerned about security so i have a shorewall firewall on the
machine runnign squid n works grt
now i would like to know the follwing
1) does anyone one know of any goo
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:48 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I'm wondering if there's some more permanent way around this
> issue. Do I need to overwrite the MBR on hd0? Should I reconfigure
> the system so the PATA drives are not connected to the m/b at all
> (i.e., usb enclosures)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Rcpt-To:
Dac Chartrand wrote on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:37:27 -0400:
> Haha, woops, typo. I meant "They (the provider) didn't give any
> answer about threads."
Ok, that makes it clear :-) I would think that putting some senseful
limits on a VPS is a normal business procedure.
Dac Chartrand wrote on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:48:36 -0400:
> I didn't give any answer about
> threads.
I don't know what this means, but I hope you are now aware that the issue
stems from a limit on threads/processes?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services
Damian S wrote:
Just one final thing (hope it helps someone in future), according to Dan
Walsh, much better (more fine-grained) than setting the allow_execmem
boolean is to do this:
chcon -t unconfined_execmem_exec_t /opt/ejabberd-2.0.2_2/bin/beam.smp
And file this as something the rpm packager
On 6-Oct-08, at 9:34 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
As said: Your problem isn't with non-standard repositories, your
problem
lies in the way your hoster handles the VPS by limiting the number of
threads on the guests.
Ok, understood.
Thank you for the help and clarification.
---
http://www.tr
On 6-Oct-08, at 9:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Dac Chartrand wrote on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:48:36 -0400:
I didn't give any answer about
threads.
I don't know what this means, but I hope you are now aware that the
issue
stems from a limit on threads/processes?
Haha, woops, typo. I meant "The
Dac Chartrand wrote:
>
> On 6-Oct-08, at 1:52 AM, John wrote:
>
>> Could please you possibly do a list of all the installed RPMs on the
>> system in question. Just for cause do a grep to list any packages like
>> "rf" = rpmforge, "jason or "litka" "centos"
>
> There no longer any rpm packages with
On 6-Oct-08, at 1:52 AM, John wrote:
Could please you possibly do a list of all the installed RPMs on the
system in question. Just for cause do a grep to list any packages like
"rf" = rpmforge, "jason or "litka" "centos"
There no longer any rpm packages with "jason" or "litka", there are a
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Ralph Angenendt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> Try turning off yum-fastestmirror and look if yum works again.
Yes. This solves the immediate problem.
Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Apart from that, as you have "inherited" a VPS. What is that? Do you rent
> it from a hosting provider? If so, and keeping in mind that there's
> obviously a problem with opening more threads (fastestmirror will open
> simu
>
>
> I don't recall accusing you of that, you mention above you
> inherited that system, it's possible that whoever had it before
> you screwed it up before you got it.
Sorry, the statement of feeling 'accused' falls under reply-to-all. I didn't
mean that you accused me. I just felt that thread
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:50:39 +0200:
> That is not true.
Well, my point was that he's not using a standard setup, that includes not
only repo's. I already pointed out in my first reply that he may hit some
limit, but he didn't follow up on that. In case there are no limits o
MS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-16.el4.centos.ia64.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Siz
nate wrote:
> I didn't mean don't use yum, I meant if you want a really
> stable system don't use 3rd party repos. Stick to what
> is in base, or use a distribution that has the apps/versions
> that are closer to what your needs are.
That doesn't have anything to do with this problem.
Ralph
pgp
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> RobertH wrote on Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:39:26 -0700:
>
> > Why does disabling something that the centos website says is "highly
> > recommended" (multiple times) fix this issue?
>
> Because he has a non-standard setup. In case you didn't recognize:
> stopping mysqld also fixes
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Vandaman wrote:
> > Dac Chartrand wrote:
> >
> >> Yum is broken.
> >
>
> Please check your version of python and mysql as I can not imagine that
> mysql itself is effecting yum, at least not the way CentOS builds it.
It probably is. As already mailed: I suspect a VPS with
Dac Chartrand wrote:
> Greetings. After doing:
>
> $ yum install mysql-server
> $ /etc/init.d/mysqld start
>
> Yum is broken. Example:
>
> $ yum list php
> Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
> Loading "priorities" plugin
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> * utterramblings: www.jasonlitka.c
Vandaman wrote:
> It will be interesting if things went like so :-
>
> - a CentOS Ivory Tower List for those on top of Ivory Towers.
> - a CentOS OT list full of 419 scammers, salesmen/affiliates posts
> - a CentOS n00b list for n00bs
Nobody ever proposed that.
Ralph
pgpZbLkvL6kBM.pgp
Descript
Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> find . -type f -exec grep -il !* {} \; -exec grep -i !* {} \; -exec echo \;
>>
>> alias it to, say, findword and run: findword
>
> Sorry, I missed the "!" in the above paste:
>
> find . -type f -exec grep -il \!* {} \; -exec grep -i \!* {} \; -exec echo \;
If you are usi
Chris Geldenhuis wrote:
> Didi wrote:
>> I just read this
>> http://www.linux-magazine.com/online/news/cebit_open_source_linux_magazine_and_linux_foundation_announce_call_for_projects
>>
>> Maybe Centos want's to try to get a stand.
>>
> I would be willing to help man a booth at CeBit
I absolut
Bob Hoffman wrote:
> You would think the program they use to present the information would
> obscure that mail address. Really no reason to show it forever is it?
So you haven't looked. pipermail *does* obscure the addresses.
Ralph
pgpNIp9In8xlb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Dac Chartrand wrote on Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:44:10 -0400:
> Well, here's where I disagree
You already admitted that you have a non-standard setup. Besides of that
it's a "VPS" of unknown origin and type. Do you consider this standard?
Nobody here can know which parts are non-standard. But it's obv
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:58:40 -0500:
>
> > No, the updates aren't nicely separated into ones that will break the
> > services you happen to need and ones that won't.
>
> Nice picture. I imagine them sitting around the table and rolling some
> dice to dete
kapil singh wrote:
Hello all,
Automount is not working well with centos 5.2, but the same is working
nicely with
centos 5 .
--
Thanks and Regards,
Kapil Singh Kushwah
Linux System/Network Administrator
Hotwax Media Inc.
Indore,(M.P) INDIA
kapil singh wrote:
Hello all,
Automount is not working well with centos 5.2, but the same is working
nicely with
centos 5 .
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
60 matches
Mail list logo
