When yum tries to acces yjl repository,
http://yellowjacketlinux.fileburst.com/yum/yjl/el5/i386/yjl-misc/repodata/repomd.xml
it gets back
Not Found
The requested URL /yum/yjl/el5/i386/yjl-misc/repodata/repomd.xml was
not found on this server.
Few days ago everything was OK.
This repository is n
Victor Padro wrote:
Hello all,
I just been wasting time with an Asus mobo trying to get CentOS/RHEL up
and running for my home lab using Xen Technologies and need an advice in
order to have a fully working Box, got any suggestions?
Use acpi=off or noapic to deal with broken Asus bioses.
N
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Alain Terriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering if any one ever consider/use Coraid for massive storage under
> CentOS?
> http://www.coraid.com
> It seems like a very reasonable option.. comments ?
It doesn't go all the way, but sure looks as interesting
Hello all,
I just been wasting time with an Asus mobo trying to get CentOS/RHEL up and
running for my home lab using Xen Technologies and need an advice in order
to have a fully working Box, got any suggestions?
which chipsets are the best out of the box for Centos AMD platform (AMD
based, nVidia
try booting with noacpi but with the BIOS set to AHCI
Already did that but same results - reboot and select proper boot
device or insert boot media in selected boot device and press a key
could be a BIOS upgrade would 'repair' the ACPI info stored in there.
I've just upgraded to
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:27 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Victor Padro wrote:
>
>> I've just tried installing RHEL 5 using the AHCI setting in BIOS, it does
>> install but as I said before "reboot and select proper boot device or insert
>> boot media in selected boot device and p
Victor Padro wrote:
I've just tried installing RHEL 5 using the AHCI setting in BIOS, it
does install but as I said before "reboot and select proper boot
device or insert boot media in selected boot device and press a key"
screen appears again, and did change the AHCI setting to SATA in BIOS,
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >And the AHCI does install CentOS, but when the install process its
> finished it boots up and says "could not mount such file system, not such
> file or directory"
>
> Hrm, AFAIK you should use AHCI w/ CentOS. As far
>And the AHCI does install CentOS, but when the install process its finished it
>boots up and says "could not mount such file system, not such file or
>directory"
Hrm, AFAIK you should use AHCI w/ CentOS. As far as it complaining after boot
sounds like it simply didn't load the module it needed
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >I was able to install RHEL 4 with no install parameters, but I can't
> upgrade using the RHEL 5 DVD, still the same issue..no HD detected in
> install process.
>
> What does your bios say for SATA config? I use many
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 08:17:20PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >The key is mostly sufficient memory so
> >that the machine doesn't swap and can keep commonly accessed programs
> >in I/O cache.
>
> If the clients had lots of ram (>=2Gb), can I disable the swap file
> altogether?
Yup! (That'
>I was able to install RHEL 4 with no install parameters, but I can't upgrade
>using the RHEL 5 DVD, still the same issue..no HD detected in install process.
What does your bios say for SATA config? I use many asus mobo's for
desktop/lab/home setups.
That mobo should work, all mine have the SATA
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Victor Padro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Victor Padro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I got this tiny problem, I bought an Asus m2n-vm hdmi mobo two weeks ago
>> and it seems not to be fully working under centos
>The key is mostly sufficient memory so
>that the machine doesn't swap and can keep commonly accessed programs
>in I/O cache.
If the clients had lots of ram (>=2Gb), can I disable the swap file altogether?
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cent
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:47:04PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >What's wrong with NFS? You can even have root on NFS these days
> >A quick google found:
> > http://www.digitalpeer.com/id/linuxnfs
>
> Nothing actually, just no experience with it. What is the performance like of
> NFS?
> Giv
John Thomas wrote:
Rogelio wrote:
Can anyone recommend a hardened CentOS distro?
Perhaps you can find a Viagra RPM
ROFL
--
Registered Microsoft Partner
My "Foundation" verse:
Isa 54:17
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.c
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Advance apologies for being slightly OT.
>
> Has anyone had successes with installing gphpedit on CentOS 5? There don't
> seem to be any rpms avail for our distro and I'm far too new to roll my own.
>
> Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi, i have @server1.domain.com, #server2.domain.com, @server3.domain.com
and @server4.domain.com and i distrib the e-mail users in that four
servers for equal. 2 servers have:
dovecot+sendmail+mailscanner+spamassassin+clamav+ssl/tls+squirrelmail and
other two have:
doveco
hi, i have @server1.domain.com, #server2.domain.com, @server3.domain.com
and @server4.domain.com and i distrib the e-mail users in that four
servers for equal. 2 servers have:
dovecot+sendmail+mailscanner+spamassassin+clamav+ssl/tls+squirrelmail and
other two have:
dovecot+postfix+amavisd+spamassas
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Victor Padro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I got this tiny problem, I bought an Asus m2n-vm hdmi mobo two weeks ago
> and it seems not to be fully working under centos amd64(4.6, 4.9, 5.0, 5.1)
> or even redhat EL 5.0 i386, amd64, I tried to install ce
Thanks, it is burning at this moment! I appreciate the heads-up!
-- Dexter
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Dexter Stowers wrote:
>
> I am having problems burning DVD's from commandline. I was wondering if
> anyone else has had any luck using cdrecord-2.01
>What's wrong with NFS? You can even have root on NFS these days
>A quick google found:
> http://www.digitalpeer.com/id/linuxnfs
Nothing actually, just no experience with it. What is the performance like of
NFS?
Given good hardware, does this make for a production quality setup?
Thanks!
jlc
___
Dexter Stowers wrote:
I am having problems burning DVD's from commandline. I was wondering
if anyone else has had any luck using cdrecord-2.01 and cdrtools that
is supposed to add DVD support? Thanks!
-- Dexter
Not the tool you asked about but if you have already created the iso file:
gr
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 13:19 -0700, dnk wrote:
> > Thank you so much for the information.
>
> You're welcome!
>
> > I will follow up with them regarding connectivity. I know that the one
> > office will be Ok (Mexico City), b
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 15:21 -0400, Dexter Stowers wrote:
> I am having problems burning DVD's from commandline. I was wondering
> if anyone else has had any luck using cdrecord-2.01 and cdrtools that
> is supposed to add DVD support? Thanks!
Well, I *think* I used it to burn my current 5.x DVD, bu
Hello all,
I got this tiny problem, I bought an Asus m2n-vm hdmi mobo two weeks ago and
it seems not to be fully working under centos amd64(4.6, 4.9, 5.0, 5.1) or
even redhat EL 5.0 i386, amd64, I tried to install centos and redhat EL
using the linux dd and linux noprobe commands to load driver di
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 13:19 -0700, dnk wrote:
> Thank you so much for the information.
You're welcome!
> I will follow up with them regarding connectivity. I know that the one
> office will be Ok (Mexico City), but the other is tiny.
I read your post again about one office being at a work site
Thank you so much for the information.
I will follow up with them regarding connectivity. I know that the one
office will be Ok (Mexico City), but the other is tiny.
dnk
On 2-Jun-08, at 1:04 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 22:47 -0700, dnk wrote:
I have 3 offices, 1 in Can
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 10:29 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:16 AM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > win9X has horrible network username habits...you need to determine what
> > username its running as... dirty trick, log off, and the username should be
> > in the lo
Alain Terriault wrote:
> Just wondering if any one ever consider/use Coraid for massive storage
> under CentOS?
> http://www.coraid.com
> It seems like a very reasonable option.. comments ?
I have one of those installed on CentOS 4.6 with 1TB of storage. I'm
sharing it between three servers. I c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dexter Stowers wrote:
> I am having problems burning DVD's from commandline. I was wondering if
> anyone else has had any luck using cdrecord-2.01 and cdrtools that is
> supposed to add DVD support? Thanks!
I thought dvd+rw-tools provided DVD support
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 22:47 -0700, dnk wrote:
> I have 3 offices, 1 in Canada, 2 in Mexico. We are currently
> investigating connectivity options (still no results yet), but I
> suspect one of the Mexican sites will be very limited.
Depending upon which cities in Mexico your offices are in, you m
>
> My personal guess (and probably more than a few others) is that Sun is
> interested in taking the clustering functionality that
> underlies Lustre
> and integrating it with ZFS for a future version of Solaris.
> Even if
> Sun stops supporting Lustre development on Linux, its GPL open source,
Just wondering if any one ever consider/use Coraid for massive storage
under CentOS?
http://www.coraid.com
It seems like a very reasonable option.. comments ?
I$ilon could also be a option for petabytes storage
http://www.isilon.com/products/index.php
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To start I wish
Lundgren, Andrew wrote:
Lustre only runs on Linux. RH5 is fully supported. (And it works fine with
CentOS 5.)
My personal guess (and probably more than a few others) is that Sun is
interested in taking the clustering functionality that underlies Lustre
and integrating it with ZFS for a
John R Pierce wrote:
> hey, just did a
>
>yum install wireshark
>
> on a fresh and clean CentOS 4.6 box, and got a bazillion warnings about
> libsmi...
> warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
Known error.
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2624 and
http://bugs.centos.org/view.p
> 1. Should I just do iSCSI backed diskless setups? Probably doesn't scale well.
What's wrong with NFS? You can even have root on NFS these days
A quick google found:
http://www.digitalpeer.com/id/linuxnfs
My first thought:
Install a workstation as normal, then tar/untar them onto the NFS serv
I made a post in the Fedora list that didn't yield much help regarding this.
I need to use a CentOS5.1 server to remotely boot a few Fedora 9
workstations. I have the option of using straight PXE, or even reflashing
gPXE to the LOM for the clients. What I am interested in knowing is the
best approa
I am having problems burning DVD's from commandline. I was wondering if
anyone else has had any luck using cdrecord-2.01 and cdrtools that is
supposed to add DVD support? Thanks!
-- Dexter
-- Dexter Fitzgerald Stowers
Systems Programmer I
Systems Administrator Unix/Linux Systems
142 Freeman Hall
Bent Terp wrote:
Lustre?
there's also the commercial IBrix Fusion distributed file system. I've
only seen demos and done a paper eval for a project that never
materialized, it looked very interesting, but our requirements shifted,
so we never got past the initial research stage... Its
Lustre only runs on Linux. RH5 is fully supported. (And it works fine with
CentOS 5.)
>
> > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As for file systems there is only really one for that scenario,
> > > GFS, as OCFSv1 only goes up to 8TB and OCFSv2 is
Bent Terp wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As for file systems there is only really one for that scenario,
> > GFS, as OCFSv1 only goes up to 8TB and OCFSv2 is still a
> > technology preview. Besides GFS is included in the distro!
>
> Lustr
Rogelio wrote:
Can anyone recommend a hardened CentOS distro?
Perhaps you can find a Viagra RPM
Okay, I'll shut up.
--
Sincerely,
John Thomas
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for file systems there is only really one for that scenario,
> GFS, as OCFSv1 only goes up to 8TB and OCFSv2 is still a
> technology preview. Besides GFS is included in the distro!
Lustre?
___
My networked printer has developed a fault and has to be returned to the
manufacturer, so I have to go back to a usb printer attached to my file
server. In the past I worked happily with a remote printer, but I'm having
no success at all today, and could do with some prompting.
/var/log/cups/e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If there was a way to create a Linux (Centos) 100TB -
> 500TB or larger clustered file system with the nodes
> connected via infiniband that was easily manageable with
> throughput that can support multiple 10Gbps Ethernet
> connections I would be very interested.
C
John R Pierce wrote:
MHR wrote:
The 98 boot has an automatic (no password) logon. As I said, I can't
win9X has horrible network username habits...you need to determine
what username its running as... dirty trick, log off, and the username
should be in the login prompt, just hit enter to
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:16 AM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> win9X has horrible network username habits...you need to determine what
> username its running as... dirty trick, log off, and the username should be
> in the login prompt, just hit enter to relogin with the same user
To start I wish to that you for the swift response on this
issue. I do not think that I would get such a quick
response from a proprietary (closed-source) company. Open
Source :-).
To respond to one the comments about large file systems
recommend you split it in several smaller (2-4TB)
files
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:14:24AM -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Assuming you still want those all-in-one file systems then you
> > may want to look at JFS as I have heard good things about both
> > it's stability and perfor
MHR wrote:
The 98 boot has an automatic (no password) logon. As I said, I can't
use the Network Neighborhood to see anything on the server - in fact,
it can't even see the workgroup, even after I double checked all the
setting.
However, I can attempt to attach to resources, but, e.g., when I tr
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Assuming you still want those all-in-one file systems then you
> may want to look at JFS as I have heard good things about both
> it's stability and performance.
>
> Is there anyone running JFS currently that can attes
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:25 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a couple of partial solutions.
>
:
>
> Unfortunately, this did nothing to help the remote Windows 98 boot,
> which still can't see the network server or its resources. Also
> unfortunately, the 98 boot is the more important o
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 at 7:03am, Johnny Hughes wrote
I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me. If
XFS was production ready, it would be in RHEL. Since it is turned on
in Fedora and since it is purposely turned off in RHEL, one can
reasonably con
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 at 7:03am, Johnny Hughes wrote
I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me. If XFS was
production ready, it would be in RHEL. Since it is turned on in Fedora and
since it is purposely turned off in RHEL, one can reasonably conclude that
the upstream peop
Hi all,
Advance apologies for being slightly OT.
Has anyone had successes with installing gphpedit on CentOS 5? There
don't seem to be any rpms avail for our distro and I'm far too new to
roll my own.
Thanks in advance (off - list replies are welcome if that's more
appropriate)
-Ray
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 06:27:55PM +0300, Linux wrote:
> For my cruiosity, what is your current kernel version?
# uname -a
Linux stargate3 2.6.9-67.0.15.EL #1 Thu May 8 10:39:19 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386
GNU/Linux
yum check-update doesn't show any available kernels, so I presume I'm current.
--
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:22 PM, David Mackintosh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...which I think is because the IDE controller isn't really
> recognized, or is pretending to be a SATA controller:
For my cruiosity, what is your current kernel version?
___
C
Hi folks,
I have an HP Proliant 140DL G2 server with what appears to be an IDE
drive in non-DMA mode. Performance on the server is extremely bad
when large amounts of disk activity is taking place.
I think the problem is that my drive is not in DMA mode:
# hdparm /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
multcount
I have used this on my server http://bastille-linux.sourceforge.net/ ...
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Ned Slider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rogelio wrote:
>
>> John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>>> CentOS /is/ a distro, there is only one centos 'distribution'.
>>> centos configured with selinux enab
Rogelio wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
CentOS /is/ a distro, there is only one centos 'distribution'.
centos configured with selinux enabled, appropriate firewall rules,
and the minimum number of services required for your application
should be fairly 'hardened' as-is.
Understood. I mean
Bent Terp wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Johnny Hughes
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me.
>
> Interesting, I thought that XFS was fairly safe for use. What would
> you recommend for filesystems in the 50-500 terabyte range?
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MHR
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 6:34 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS-Samba question
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 5:20 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> """If you logged on from the Windo
Rogelio wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> CentOS /is/ a distro, there is only one centos 'distribution'.
>> centos configured with selinux enabled, appropriate firewall rules,
>> and the minimum number of services required for your application
>> should be fairly 'hardened' as-is.
>
> Understood.
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Bent Terp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting, I thought that XFS was fairly safe for use. What would
you recommend for filesystems in the 50-500 terabyte range?
I would recommend you split it in several smaller (2-4TB) filesystems
John R Pierce wrote:
CentOS /is/ a distro, there is only one centos 'distribution'.
centos configured with selinux enabled, appropriate firewall rules, and
the minimum number of services required for your application should be
fairly 'hardened' as-is.
Understood. I meant CentOS-based,
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Bent Terp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting, I thought that XFS was fairly safe for use. What would
> you recommend for filesystems in the 50-500 terabyte range?
I would recommend you split it in several smaller (2-4TB) filesystems.
Most applications would su
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me.
Interesting, I thought that XFS was fairly safe for use. What would
you recommend for filesystems in the 50-500 terabyte range?
(And yes, we do actually run a
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:40 AM, sbeam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an existing in-production LAMP server running Centos 5.1...
>
> We have a near-identical system I am thinking of bringing in as a
> DRBD/Heartbeat companion...
Why don't you consider using MySQL master-slave replication? It
Linux wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also normally build all the extras kmods while I build the centosplus
kernel, so they were also not yet done ... however I did go ahead and build
I dont intend to blame anybody but kmod_xfs was a couple of
sbeam wrote:
Thanks guys for the info. I understand that the secondary machine needs a /var
too while in standby, and since it can't also mount it as part of the DRBD
array, then it has to be a vanilla partition on both machines. Thanks for
clearing that up.
On Saturday 31 May 2008 09:28, Fil
I have a couple of partial solutions.
For the remote Windows XP boot:
1) The firewall (ZoneAlarm) was blocking all pings. Why? I have no
idea. According to its program data, ping was enabled for local and
internet access, and the "allow server" fields were unset (meaning
that it was supposed t
72 matches
Mail list logo
