can we configure offline file shares in samba as we do on a windows pc
Gopinath ___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
Barry Brimer schrieb:
Quoting Sebastian Marten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi list,
Is it possible to set up an NFSv4/Kerberos environment on CentOS 5.1?
I set up Kerberos and NFS but get several erros
"Warning: rpc.gssd appears not to be running.
mount.nfs4: Permission denied"
Is this an CentO
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 20:19, MHR wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Spangler
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can I use one out of the Fedora's repos? If so, which repo?
>
> You can just pull down the latest version from mozilla.org - they're
> pretty good about compatibilit
Matt Shields wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
support.
Not sure about FC6, but in both CentOS 4 & 5 there is an ip6tables. I
haven't used it, but
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Matt Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >>
> >> We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
> >> support.
> >>
> >> That requir
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>> We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
>> support.
>>
>> That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or
>> some other Linux distro.
>>
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
support.
That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or
some other Linux distro.
None of the various free Linux firewalls have IPv6 support. Supposedly
FWBuilder can manage
Mag Gam wrote:
Hello:
I am planning to implement GFS for my university as a summer project. I
have 10 servers each with SAN disks attached. I will be reading and
writing many files for professor's research projects. Each file can be
anywhere from 1k to 120GB (fluid dynamic research images). T
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> write(2, "The program \'gnome-terminal\' rec"..., 592) = 592
>
> This looks interesting, but unfortunately you cut the message too
> sh
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> write(2, "The program \'gnome-terminal\' rec"..., 592) = 592
This looks interesting, but unfortunately you cut the message too
short to know what it was saying... You might find it in
/var/log/Xorg.0.log, but I wouldn'
Hi,
I configured delay pools on squid. I get the following from squidclient:
Delay pools configured: 2
Pool: 1
Class: 1
Aggregate:
Disabled.
Pool: 2
Class: 1
Aggregate:
Max: 187500
Restore: 187500
Current:
Thanks Tru and Johnny, one more question. Can I just use the
centos5-testing repo, ie, yum enablerepoxxx install kernel-vm? I ask
because I tried and while it worked it loaded an older kernel. Should I
just go to tru's directory and install the RPM directly? Also, ok more than
one question, are
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 13:09 +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 May 2008 21:51:07 -0400
> > "WLM" == William L Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> WLM> I chose not to uninstall the distributed one. I unpackaed the
> WLM> 3.0rc1 tarball in the $HOME of a user and run
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Alfred von Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fresh install via kickstart. I reformatted the root and /boot partitions,
> but left one user partition untouched.
>
> I don't think this is possible since I reformatted the root partition (I
> only have /, /boot, an
Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-29-2008 12:42 PM Ned Slider spake the following:
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this
one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.ph
on 5-29-2008 12:42 PM Ned Slider spake the following:
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this
one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853
that bug
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this
one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853
that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about
on 5-29-2008 11:52 AM Jerry Geis spake the following:
Jerry Geis wrote:
>>/
/>>/ now do:
/>>/
/>>/ i586 text mem=128
/>>/
/>>/ />/ when I do "i586 text mem=128" it says cant find kernel
/>/ so I do "linux i586 text mem=128" and I get the same behavior
/>/ Loading vmlinuz
/>/ Loading initrd
On May 29, 2008, at 14:48, Johnny Hughes wrote:
How did you upgrade?
Fresh install via kickstart. I reformatted the root and /boot
partitions, but left one user partition untouched.
Is it possible that you have older (possibly orphaned) binaries
still installed from the upgrade process?
Jerry Geis wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
>>/
/>>/ now do:
/>>/
/>>/ i586 text mem=128
/>>/
/>>/ />/ when I do "i586 text mem=128" it says cant find kernel
/>/ so I do "linux i586 text mem=128" and I get the same behavior
/>/ Loading vmlinuz
/>/ Loading initrd
/>/ and reboot.
/>/ />/ Am I no
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this one,
there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853
that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about a
workaround, but
>I expect that you will see "net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1"
>
>Please confirm.
>
>Barry
You were right, thanks for the info.
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
MHR wrote:
I'm trying to build GNOME (to run a more recent version than 2.16.* on
CentOS 5.1) and I keep running into a lot of rather strange problems.
I'm wondering if this might have something to do with my hybrid 64 and
32 bit general environment, so I want to try a pure 64-bit chroot.
I've
Jerry Geis wrote:
>>/
/>>/ now do:
/>>/
/>>/ i586 text mem=128
/>>/
/>>/
/>/ when I do "i586 text mem=128" it says cant find kernel
/>/ so I do "linux i586 text mem=128" and I get the same behavior
/>/ Loading vmlinuz
/>/ Loading initrd
/>/ and reboot.
/>/
/>/ Am I not correctly spec
Alfred von Campe wrote:
Ever since I upgraded all my systems to CentOS 5.1 I have been getting
reports from users about "all their windows disappearing". A little
digging revealed that they meant all gnome-terminal windows. Since
there is only one gnome-terminal process by default for all you
Jerry Geis wrote:
now do:
i586 text mem=128
when I do "i586 text mem=128" it says cant find kernel
so I do "linux i586 text mem=128" and I get the same behavior
Loading vmlinuz
Loading initrd
and reboot.
Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet?
Are you sure this is a CD-1
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:23 -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> Ever since I upgraded all my systems to CentOS 5.1 I have been
> getting reports from users about "all their windows disappearing". A
> little digging revealed that they meant all gnome-terminal windows.
> Since there is only one
now do:
i586 text mem=128
when I do "i586 text mem=128" it says cant find kernel
so I do "linux i586 text mem=128" and I get the same behavior
Loading vmlinuz
Loading initrd
and reboot.
Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet?
Jerry
___
Ever since I upgraded all my systems to CentOS 5.1 I have been
getting reports from users about "all their windows disappearing". A
little digging revealed that they meant all gnome-terminal windows.
Since there is only one gnome-terminal process by default for all
your open terminal wind
I'm trying to build GNOME (to run a more recent version than 2.16.* on
CentOS 5.1) and I keep running into a lot of rather strange problems.
I'm wondering if this might have something to do with my hybrid 64 and
32 bit general environment, so I want to try a pure 64-bit chroot.
I've never done th
Jerry Geis wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
>>/
/>>/ On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
/>>/ >/ />/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
/>>/ /http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
/>>/
/>>/ you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
/>
Jerry Geis wrote:
>>/
/>>/ On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
/>>/ >/ />/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
/>>/ /http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
/>>/
/>>/ you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
/>>/ is the cpu i686
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Jeffrey B. Layton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
> use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The
> bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
> Has anyone played wi
on 5-29-2008 4:55 AM Daniel de Kok spake the following:
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It will depend upon if Red Hat will release a version for Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. The best bet will be that they will not release it
until RHEL-4.7 goes into
Jerry Geis wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
>/ />/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
/http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
is the cpu i686 compatible?
yes this is the
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:38:38PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
...
>
> yes this is the box I am trying to install on...
>
> I dont know if its i686, either way I thought i386 should work. I am I
> wrong?
yes, the i686 has some additionnal instructions that a i586 does not
have. I have no idea about
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
>/
/>/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
/http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
is the cpu i686 compatible?
Tru
Tru,
yes this is the box I
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
> I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
is the cpu i686 compatible?
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/
Jerry Geis wrote:
>/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
/>/ This unit has a vortex86 CPU.
/>/ When installing the unit finds the USB cdrom I type "linux text" and it
/>/ starts
/>/ vlinuz...
/>/ init
/>/ Screen goes black and the unit reboots.
/
Sounds like an i586 CPU
Hi, I just had a couple of questions about nfsnobody.
We run a very large NFS infrastructure based off of a NetApp, and we're
been discussing whether or not it is necessary to have 64 bit nfsnobody
as 4294967294. I understand the reasoning behind this (2^32 - 2 gives
you a max UID), but we're
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
> This unit has a vortex86 CPU.
> When installing the unit finds the USB cdrom I type "linux text" and it
> starts
> vlinuz...
> init
> Screen goes black and the unit reboots.
Sounds like an i586 CPU which is not sup
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Answer: When it's ready.
Suits me - I have a different question (and it's pro
Jerry Geis wrote:
>/ I am looking for the servercd for i386 centos 5.1 on the mirrors.
/>/ Not finding it though.
/>/
/>/ Can someone point me to it. Thanks,
/>/
/>/ Jerry
/
There is currently no serverCD for CentOS 5.1, but you can install from
just the first CD if that helps. See here:
h
Jerry Geis wrote:
I am looking for the servercd for i386 centos 5.1 on the mirrors.
Not finding it though.
Can someone point me to it. Thanks,
Jerry
There is currently no serverCD for CentOS 5.1, but you can install from
just the first CD if that helps. See here:
http://wiki.centos.org/FA
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Answer: When it's ready.
> >> Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up s
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Answer: When it's ready.
Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up somewhere
I don't have time to look at t
I am looking for the servercd for i386 centos 5.1 on the mirrors.
Not finding it though.
Can someone point me to it. Thanks,
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:12 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
> > Good morning,
> >
> > I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
> > use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The
> > bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
> > Has a
Quoting whoami i <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> Is there any way to re-export an nfs mounted directory? I am having three
> servers runnning on centos4.5 and i am trying to implement nfs share in an
> below manner [bcoz there is no alternative way for me to setup nfs share]
Did you add the opti
Quoting Sebastian Marten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi list,
> Is it possible to set up an NFSv4/Kerberos environment on CentOS 5.1?
> I set up Kerberos and NFS but get several erros
>
> "Warning: rpc.gssd appears not to be running.
> mount.nfs4: Permission denied"
>
> Is this an CentOS oder an config
Markus Hetzenecker wrote:
We start to use centos 5 for our workstation at our site (University Innsbruck)
and we use openafs to hold the home directories. There would be a big advantage
to have the openafs kernel module (and the additional rpms) in the centos
extras (or addons) repository with an
Jeffrey B. Layton <> scribbled on Thursday, May 29, 2008 1:31 PM:
I use CentOS 5.1 with 256M RAM (incl X, Gnome, Firefox etc and the proprietary
Nvidia 3D gfx drivers. Yes I know it's overkill, but it's so much nicer and
easier to move around stuff using a file manager instead of doing it on the
C
We start to use centos 5 for our workstation at our site (University Innsbruck)
and we use openafs to hold the home directories. There would be a big advantage
to have the openafs kernel module (and the additional rpms) in the centos
extras (or addons) repository with an automatic compile for the a
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:12:38PM +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
> Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
> >Good morning,
> >
> >I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
> >use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The
> >bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
> >Has
Hi list,
Is it possible to set up an NFSv4/Kerberos environment on CentOS 5.1?
I set up Kerberos and NFS but get several erros
"Warning: rpc.gssd appears not to be running.
mount.nfs4: Permission denied"
Is this an CentOS oder an config problem?
Greetings
Sebastian
signature.asc
Description:
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008, Joe Pruett wrote:
so, has anyone seen ipsec get messed up with the latest kernel?
i have verified that dropping back to the 53.1.19 kernel makes ipsec
function again. with the new 5.2 kernel coming soon, i'm not sure if it
makes sense to try and figur
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with
little memory? Ideally, I don
Alfred von Campe wrote:
On May 28, 2008, at 14:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:
We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try
to get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have
the 5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait.
Does the 5.2 kernel inclu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Robert Moskowitz
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:42 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] PPPoE client help
Please point me in the right direction
My ISP is giving me an IPv6 prefix, but to get t
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with
little memory? Ideally, I don
On Thursday 29 May 2008 13:22:15 Wojtek Pilorz wrote:
> I'd also like it to work with the existing wireless
>
> > card (Dlink DWL-G650). Any thoughts or recommendations?
>
> No idea here.
I'm fairly sure I've seen a how-to for that, so it's worth googling. I may
have a printout with a url, but
Hi
Is there any way to re-export an nfs mounted directory? I am having three
servers runnning on centos4.5 and i am trying to implement nfs share in an
below manner [bcoz there is no alternative way for me to setup nfs share]
HOST A--->>>EXPORTS /prod/data --->>>HOST B
HOST B >>MOUNTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
> I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
> use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The
> bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
> Has anyone played with using Centos5 on sys
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:31:17AM -0400, Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
> use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The
> bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
> Has anyone played with using C
On Thursday 29 May 2008 12:31:17 Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
> use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The
> bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
> Has anyone played with using Centos5 on
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It will depend upon if Red Hat will release a version for Red Hat
> Enterprise Linux. The best bet will be that they will not release it
> until RHEL-4.7 goes into beta testing.
It looks like there is a good chance
IMO, CentOS is not a good choice for old hardware with small amounts of
ram, esp since the apps you want to use (Fx2 and OoO) are notorious for
being profligate with ram.
If no-one here can point you to a Redhat-based distro with modest
requirements, you could check out Zenwalk, which uses XFCE. I
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with
little memory? Ideally, I don't need too much - Firefox
We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
support.
That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or
some other Linux distro.
None of the various free Linux firewalls have IPv6 support. Supposedly
FWBuilder can manage Netfilters for a Linux Ke
> On Tue, 27 May 2008 21:51:07 -0400
> "WLM" == William L Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
WLM> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 17:19 -0700, MHR wrote:
>> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Spangler
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Can I use one out of the Fedora's
Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have found this link http://owlriver.com/tips/tiny-centos
> for installing centos on a minimal system. I am looking at putting
> centos on a 1 GIG flash drive. The above page talks about removing
> packages after install to attain the small size.
>
> however, I am getting blo
So, how do you have your setup?
How many nodes? I need something stable so I will look into GFSv1, but may
consider GFSv2 later on.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mag Gam wrote:
> > I am planning to implement GFS for my university as a summer proje
Balaji wrote:
After some changes the Linux Boot-Up Progress bar "Show Details" Menu
when i enable the Menu it will not shows the start-up services
details.
When the grub menu appears, press a key to interrupt the countdown
timer. Then press "e" to edit the default boot kernel settings.
Dear All,
I have Installed CentOS 4.4 Linux and Linux Boot-Up Progress bar
"Show Details" Menu
when i enable the Menu it shows the start-up services details.
Then i have done some changes in Linux but i am forgotten the changes.
After some changes the Linux Boot-Up Progress bar "Sho
Mag Gam wrote:
> I am planning to implement GFS for my university as a summer project. I
> have 10 servers each with SAN disks attached.
GFS works well, gfs2 is at the moment in technology-preview mode only,
but its still worth looking at.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROT
Joe Pruett wrote:
>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853
>
> thanks. i had looked in the upstream bugzilla and not found anything
> obvious, but didn't think to look at the centos bug database. i'll
> remember that for next time.
we tried to get that note included in the update release annou
William L. Maltby wrote:
> IIRC, there are several threads about this on the site. I *think* it was
> that you need to also unselect individual packages to get a truly
> minimal install. Check out the archives.
correct, and you need to run the GUI installer..
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan
William L. Maltby wrote:
>> I have a Firefox3 beta3 rpm for CentOS-4 that works in parallel with the
>> distro firefox. once Firefox3 is released upstream I will get that built
>> for CentOS-4 and put that in the CentOS Plus repo.
>
> JIC you might have an interest (saves work later, more stable
79 matches
Mail list logo
