Re: [CentOS] Problem installing the 53.1.6 kernel

--- MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On top of my previously (just now) difficulties with > yum, now I find that > the 53.1.6 kernel is not installing properly. > > When I run "yum update" to install it, the install > hangs here: > > Dependencies Resolved > > ==

Re: [CentOS] Problem installing the 53.1.6 kernel

MHR wrote: On top of my previously (just now) difficulties with yum, now I find that the 53.1.6 kernel is not installing properly. When I run "yum update" to install it, the install hangs here: Dependencies Resolved =

RE: [CentOS] DVD support on CentOS 5.1

Thank you VERY much mhr! I appreciate your time and will go grab MPlayer right now! Take care, Manuel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MHR Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:33 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] DVD support

Re: [CentOS] DVD support on CentOS 5.1

On Jan 23, 2008 10:08 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello out there! Hello. > Been around the block trying to get DVD support for Totem, but I keep running > into dead ends everywhere I go. Looking for CentOS 5.1-compatible xine and > xine-lib packages as that seems to be the answer, but t

[CentOS] DVD support on CentOS 5.1

Hello out there! Been around the block trying to get DVD support for Totem, but I keep running into dead ends everywhere I go. Looking for CentOS 5.1-compatible xine and xine-lib packages as that seems to be the answer, but the only ones I find (like on DAG) seem to be just dead links or I get

[CentOS] Re: Problem installing the 53.1.6 kernel

CORRECTION - please see below On Jan 23, 2008 9:54 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On top of my previously (just now) difficulties with yum, now I find that the 53.1.6 kernel is not installing properly. > > When I run "yum update" to install it, the install hangs here: > > Dependencies Re

[CentOS] Problem installing the 53.1.6 kernel

On top of my previously (just now) difficulties with yum, now I find that the 53.1.6 kernel is not installing properly. When I run "yum update" to install it, the install hangs here: Dependencies Resolved = Package

[CentOS] Problems with yum not updating properly

Has anyone else seen this? I recently got the announcement about the xorg 1.5 update being available, so I ran yum update to get it. To my surprise, I found that yum did not see it at all. With some help from Karanbir (thanks again), we decided there might be something wrong with my repo path, s

Re: [CentOS] How can i share my WAN ip to my LAN?

On Jan 23, 2008 9:43 AM, Tolun ARDAHANLI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi again to everyone; > > Guys your mails are very nice... i liked all of them... > > let me give you about my system and my need(sorry for writing these late)... > > I've got an IBM x3650 server which is open 7d/24h. It has got

Re: [CentOS] Appreciate the help...

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 10:12:13PM -0500, Scott Ehrlich alleged: > I received some interesting answers to my cron question. Most people said > it was not possible. One person reviewed cron's source code and said the > source would need to be modified. One person said I should mount the > file

Re: [CentOS] Appreciate the help...

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 10:12:13PM -0500, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > To answer several people's curiosities of why I keep pushing - when I'm > tasked with a quest, I try to tap all my resources, including this list, to > find a solution. One never knows when an answer might be obvious, or > perplex

[CentOS] Appreciate the help...

I received some interesting answers to my cron question. Most people said it was not possible. One person reviewed cron's source code and said the source would need to be modified. One person said I should mount the filesystem with noexec. I'll review and test the answers as best I can. T

Re: [CentOS] Why Kudzu, Why?

A little birdy told me that Michael A. Peters said: ] Michael Semcheski wrote: ] > So I have a CentOS 5 machine, which I recently did a 'yum update' on. ] > Everything went fine, but I rebooted as a precaution (just to confront ] > any problems which might arise the first time after an update). ]

Re: [CentOS] Why Kudzu, Why?

On Jan 23, 2008 9:59 PM, Michael A. Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know but I always disable kudzu after initial install on > machines that don't change hardware because I've had similar things > happen to me in pre-fedora redhat. I leave it on my laptop though. The machine in questio

Re: [CentOS] Why Kudzu, Why?

On Jan 23, 2008 10:02 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd probably have diff'd the files before overwriting to see wtf was hosed. That was my first thought. There was no ifcfg-eth0, only ifcfg-eth0.bak. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

Re: [CentOS] Why Kudzu, Why?

Michael Semcheski wrote: So I have a CentOS 5 machine, which I recently did a 'yum update' on. Everything went fine, but I rebooted as a precaution (just to confront any problems which might arise the first time after an update). And sure enough, when the machine came back up, the network didn't

Re: [CentOS] Why Kudzu, Why?

Michael Semcheski wrote: So I have a CentOS 5 machine, which I recently did a 'yum update' on. Everything went fine, but I rebooted as a precaution (just to confront any problems which might arise the first time after an update). And sure enough, when the machine came back up, the network didn't

Re: [CentOS] Fedora user moving to CentOS

Tim Alberts wrote: Greetings, I'm a Fedora user likely going to switch to CentOS in the next few days. I'm wondering if anyone has some heads up advice for me? I am very familiar with FC6 and before so I anticipate few problems I haven't already seen (and know were fixed). The main reason f

[CentOS] Why Kudzu, Why?

So I have a CentOS 5 machine, which I recently did a 'yum update' on. Everything went fine, but I rebooted as a precaution (just to confront any problems which might arise the first time after an update). And sure enough, when the machine came back up, the network didn't work. Luckilly, someone s

Re: [CentOS] Fedora user moving to CentOS

On Jan 23, 2008 7:38 PM, Tim Alberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings, I'm a Fedora user likely going to switch to CentOS in the > next few days. I'm wondering if anyone has some heads up advice for > me? I am very familiar with FC6 and before so I anticipate few problems > I haven't alread

Re: [CentOS] Why iptables are not working?

On Wednesday 23 January 2008 17:58, John R Pierce wrote: > > > > It is most likely installed as this is default unless you tell the > > install program not to install it. > > > > To start IPTALBES: > > > > service iptables start > > > > To ensure it starts all the time on reboot: > > >

Re: [CentOS] crontab - corrected version

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 08:16:27PM -0500, Scott Ehrlich alleged: > So I want to see if there is a way to restrict crontab from running an > executable or anything else from a world-writable directory, or > subdirectory thereof. Not in any way I can think of. pgp0nYXEyiymG.pgp Description: PGP

[CentOS] Fedora user moving to CentOS

Greetings, I'm a Fedora user likely going to switch to CentOS in the next few days. I'm wondering if anyone has some heads up advice for me? I am very familiar with FC6 and before so I anticipate few problems I haven't already seen (and know were fixed). The main reason for the move is so I

Re: [CentOS] crontab - corrected version

On Wed, January 23, 2008 8:16 pm, Scott Ehrlich wrote: > So I want to see if there is a way to restrict crontab from running an > executable or anything else from a world-writable directory, or > subdirectory thereof. One way of accomplishing that is to mount the file system that holds the directo

[CentOS] crontab - corrected version

So I want to see if there is a way to restrict crontab from running an executable or anything else from a world-writable directory, or subdirectory thereof. Thanks. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi

[CentOS] Amanda oddity (amcheck)

I'm slowly getting everything back to normal here after swapping motherboards on my server. I also took the opportunity to bring the server up to CentOS 5. I'm still getting services working but I have one oddity with amanda. Ever since I upgraded the server to CentOS 5, amcheck dies and giv

Re: [CentOS] Why iptables are not working?

Robert Spangler wrote: On Wednesday 23 January 2008 06:25, Tolun ARDAHANLI wrote: in our server we dont have "iptables" command! and i am trying to install it with that yum -y install iptables after this command it says that "...nothings to do". Do you have any suggestion for installin

[CentOS] Re: Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

on 1/23/2008 12:19 PM Sean Carolan spake the following: If you want to keep your existing kernel for a while, just change the grub default back after the update installs the new one. Then you can switch, reboot, and rebuild the necessary stuff whenever you have a chance. Thanks, this is prob

Re: [CentOS] Hot swapping sata drives

On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 14:14 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > Jerry Geis wrote: > > I have a two external USB drives only 1 is connected to centos 5.1 at a > > time. > > the USB drive is SLOW compared to SATA. > > The external drive suppots both connections USB and SATA. > > > > I bought a little $5

Re: [CentOS] Why iptables are not working?

On Wednesday 23 January 2008 06:25, Tolun ARDAHANLI wrote: > in our server we dont have "iptables" command! and i am trying to install > it with that > > yum -y install iptables > > after this command it says that "...nothings to do". Do you have any > suggestion for installing the iptables? >

Re: [CentOS] HA software advice

Wed, Jan 23, 2008 ve 04:24:43PM -0500, Scott McClanahan napsal: > > On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 22:20 +0100, Tomas Ruprich wrote: > > yum install heartbeat > > > > Very robust, very reliable, easy to configure, easy to use :-) We use it > > for almost every critical server for about 3 years without a

Re: [CentOS] HA software advice

On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 22:20 +0100, Tomas Ruprich wrote: > yum install heartbeat > > Very robust, very reliable, easy to configure, easy to use :-) We use it > for almost every critical server for about 3 years without any problem. > > http://www.linux-ha.org/ > > Tomáš Ruprich <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [CentOS] HA software advice

yum install heartbeat Very robust, very reliable, easy to configure, easy to use :-) We use it for almost every critical server for about 3 years without any problem. http://www.linux-ha.org/ Tomáš Ruprich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DCD IICT MUAF Brno tel.: +420 545 132 885, +420 602 127 744

Re: [CentOS] HA software advice

I neglected one obvious detail, this will running on 32 bit CentOS 5.1. On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 15:51 -0500, Scott McClanahan wrote: > We are in need of some very basic software that will give us the ability > to swing an ip address from one host to another during controlled > maintenance or host fa

[CentOS] HA software advice

We are in need of some very basic software that will give us the ability to swing an ip address from one host to another during controlled maintenance or host failure. For now the IP address will be the only resource that is shared and there will never be a need for shared storage. Eventually we

Re: [CentOS] limiting cron's capability?

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Garrick Staples wrote: On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:02:38PM -0500, Scott Ehrlich alleged: Is it possible to prevent cron from executing something in a world-readable directory, or a directory branching off a world-readable directory? Aren't all cronjobs generally already in

Re: [CentOS] Re: Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

Sean Carolan wrote: If you want to keep your existing kernel for a while, just change the grub default back after the update installs the new one. Then you can switch, reboot, and rebuild the necessary stuff whenever you have a chance. Thanks, this is probably what I will end up doing. I te

Re: [CentOS] Re: Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

If you want to keep your existing kernel for a while, just change the grub default back after the update installs the new one. Then you can switch, reboot, and rebuild the necessary stuff whenever you have a chance. Thanks, this is probably what I will end up doing. I tend to err on the side

Re: [CentOS] Hot swapping sata drives

Jerry Geis wrote: I have a two external USB drives only 1 is connected to centos 5.1 at a time. the USB drive is SLOW compared to SATA. The external drive suppots both connections USB and SATA. I bought a little $5 external SATA connector that goes into the PCI slot area (does not actually tak

Re: [CentOS] Re: Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

On Wednesday 23 January 2008 14:43:17 Garrick Staples wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:29:52PM -0600, Sean Carolan alleged: > > When I have some time to re-compile VMWare server modules, my graphics > > driver, vpn client and wifi driver I may consider updating. If in the > > If this is a probl

Re: [CentOS] Re: Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

Sean Carolan wrote: So, yes there are deeply compelling reasons to upgrade. If you want to have patches for several kernel buffer exploits, as well as many other security and functionality patches, you need to do one thing; yum upgrade, and answer yes. Or even easier; yum -y upgrade. When I

[CentOS] Hot swapping sata drives

I have a two external USB drives only 1 is connected to centos 5.1 at a time. the USB drive is SLOW compared to SATA. The external drive suppots both connections USB and SATA. I bought a little $5 external SATA connector that goes into the PCI slot area (does not actually take a PCI slot just t

Re: [CentOS] Had to POWER OFF CentOS 5.1!

Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: I was running a simple script and the system became unresponsive. I went to the console and couldn't get it to respond, so I had to POWER OFF! Ugh! (Note: this script, get-backup, ran fine on a CentOS 4.5 system) Looking through /var/log/messages, I see: Jan 23 12:

Re: [CentOS] limiting cron's capability?

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:02:38PM -0500, Scott Ehrlich alleged: > Is it possible to prevent cron from executing something in a world-readable > directory, or a directory branching off a world-readable directory? Aren't all cronjobs generally already in world-readable directories? pgpEaFwC4k5h

Re: [CentOS] Had to POWER OFF CentOS 5.1!

Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: > I was running a simple script and the system became unresponsive. I > went to the console and couldn't get it to respond, so I had to POWER > OFF! Ugh! > > (Note: this script, get-backup, ran fine on a CentOS 4.5 system) > > Ideas as to a methodology to diagnose the

Re: [CentOS] Re: Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:29:52PM -0600, Sean Carolan alleged: > When I have some time to re-compile VMWare server modules, my graphics > driver, vpn client and wifi driver I may consider updating. If in the If this is a problem, then you are doing it wrong. Either use one of the existing sol

Re: [CentOS] Had to POWER OFF CentOS 5.1!

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 at 1:38pm, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote I was running a simple script and the system became unresponsive. I went to the console and couldn't get it to respond, so I had to POWER OFF! Ugh! (Note: this script, get-backup, ran fine on a CentOS 4.5 system) Looking through /var/l

[CentOS] Had to POWER OFF CentOS 5.1!

I was running a simple script and the system became unresponsive. I went to the console and couldn't get it to respond, so I had to POWER OFF! Ugh! (Note: this script, get-backup, ran fine on a CentOS 4.5 system) Looking through /var/log/messages, I see: Jan 23 12:52:14 DoyleBrunson kernel:

Re: [CentOS] Recommend a mini or nano ITX system for Centos

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > If I am doing the gnome console via FreeNX (or VNC for that matter), am I > using the video driver on the client (my Linux notebook) or my mini-ITX > server? I would think the former, so this should not be a concern No, it shouldn't. I just wanted to make you (or o

[CentOS] limiting cron's capability?

Is it possible to prevent cron from executing something in a world-readable directory, or a directory branching off a world-readable directory? Thanks. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

on 1/23/2008 10:43 AM Barry Brimer spake the following: Quoting Sean Carolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: So, yes there are deeply compelling reasons to upgrade. If you want to have patches for several kernel buffer exploits, as well as many other security and functionality patches, you need to do one

Re: [CentOS] Re: Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

Quoting Sean Carolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > So, yes there are deeply compelling reasons to upgrade. If you want to > > have patches for several kernel buffer exploits, as well as many other > > security and functionality patches, you need to do one thing; > > > > yum upgrade, and answer yes. > >

Re: [CentOS] Re: Why iptables are not working?

--- Tolun ARDAHANLI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi; > the output of those commands are listed below... but > i see that i cant reach > to iptables if i am opening a console in > Gnome(however i give su- command > but still was the same problem)... But if I am > opening directly the console > wit

Re: [CentOS] Internet usage monitoring

Thanks to all for the pointers. I will likely go with a squid based (transparent or some sort of iptables rules) proxy, as some of the users there are on roaming laptops, and I do not want them to have to reset proxy settings, etc. Much appreciated. dnk On Jan 23, 2008 10:26 AM, dnk <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [CentOS] Re: Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

So, yes there are deeply compelling reasons to upgrade. If you want to have patches for several kernel buffer exploits, as well as many other security and functionality patches, you need to do one thing; yum upgrade, and answer yes. Or even easier; yum -y upgrade. When I have some time to re

Re: [CentOS] Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:24:42 -0600 Sean Carolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder why it is trying to delete a newer kernel than the one I'm using? It won't delete the kernel that you're currently running. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

Re: [CentOS] Internet usage monitoring

Yup. One of my clients want to add this ability to their already in place centos firewall. Dnk On Jan 22, 2008 6:11 PM, Craig Van Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you doing this for yourself or to monitor users on a network? > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail

Re: [CentOS] Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

You can set that as an option in yum.conf . However, you do run the chance of running out of space in /boot if you get too many kernels piled up there. The default is to keep the last 2 (or 3?) kernels and delete the older ones. I wonder why it is trying to delete a newer kernel than the one I

Re: [CentOS] Recommend a mini or nano ITX system for Centos

Ralph Angenendt wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: I want a fast processor, 1Gb memory, LAN, 4USB, VGA. Wireless and bluetooth optional USB dongles along with a second LAN interface). PCI slot optional (for said wireless, bluetooth or LAN!). For a mainboard, you might want to look int

[CentOS] Re: Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

on 1/23/2008 9:05 AM Sean Carolan spake the following: I am using CentOS 5.0 on my desktop workstation. Are there any deeply compelling reasons to upgrade to version 5.1? I read through the release notes but didn't see any whiz-bang new features. Perhaps some of you can share your personal e

Re: [CentOS] Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:48:20 -0600 Sean Carolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For example, why not > just disable the older kernel instead of deleting it: You can set that as an option in yum.conf . However, you do run the chance of running out of space in /boot if you get too many kernels piled

[CentOS] Re: Wireless DELL M90 with CentOS 5.1

on 1/23/2008 5:49 AM MOKRANI Rachid spake the following: Hi, I have a laptop DELL M90 with an Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG card. After installed new rpm drivers (see below), my card is recognized and I can see my wireless access point with (iwlist - iwconfig) but it's impossible to connect to i

Re: [CentOS] Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

Want to have security updates? That depends. If the security update is for a local vulnerability on my own single-user workstation then I may think twice before installing it. In other words, if the security risk is minimal then it may not be worth the hassle of upgrading my kernel and havi

Re: [CentOS] Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

Sean Carolan wrote: > I am using CentOS 5.0 on my desktop workstation. Are there any deeply > compelling reasons to upgrade to version 5.1? I read through the release > notes but didn't see any whiz-bang new features. Perhaps some of you can > share your personal experience letting us know if

[CentOS] Worth upgrading desktop to 5.1?

I am using CentOS 5.0 on my desktop workstation. Are there any deeply compelling reasons to upgrade to version 5.1? I read through the release notes but didn't see any whiz-bang new features. Perhaps some of you can share your personal experience letting us know if you have noticed any diffe

Re: [CentOS] Is there any problem with updates repo ?????

Hi, I saw that yum solved the problem of getting metadata of old mirrors recently: http://devel.linux.duke.edu/gitweb/?p=yum.git;a=commit;h=c3d6b0458742a32caf36ff3c6f03f8ef2426 Any chance to get an updated yum in CentOS-plus? I would report this upstream, if I knew how to... Tks! Filipe

RE: [CentOS] Internet usage monitoring

Sorry if my last reply was off base. He said "internet usage" which I took as client machines surfing webpages I would have replied different if it was "internet traffic". I guess I just "heard" it differently... Anyway, I hope it was useful for someone Dennis -Original Message

RE: [CentOS] Internet usage monitoring

You mean to audit where people are going? We have a (vendor provided) Websense server. Contract was for 3 years (longer than I've been here). It'll be up soon. At the current rate, it's about a 12,000.00/year savings to go to squid. I have already put up a Centos5 box with Squid, and squidguard for

Re: [CentOS] MySQL and charsets: latin1 vs. utf8

Warren Young a écrit : I think what you mean to ask is, can you run the mysql command line tool in a different character set than the system default, so that when it prints out text, it goes to the terminal with the correct character set. The answer is, yes: $ LANG=fr_FR mysql -uDBUSER -p.

Re: [CentOS] Recommend a mini or nano ITX system for Centos

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I want a fast processor, 1Gb memory, LAN, 4USB, VGA. Wireless and > bluetooth optional USB dongles along with a second LAN interface). PCI > slot optional (for said wireless, bluetooth or LAN!). For a mainboard, you might want to look into the Intel D201GLY2 -

[CentOS] Recommend a mini or nano ITX system for Centos

I am looking into convising the boss to get me a mini-itx system to replace my workhorse notebook (I have to have a corp notebook and I can remote terminal into a Centos server from it). So I have been playing with one mini-itx system (the decTOP) and am looking at my options. I want a fast

AW: [CentOS] Re: Why iptables are not working?

Hi, Does the Path "/sbin" exist in the File ".bash_profile" of User root ? If not you may add the path to the file. Maybe that could help you The other way is, that you call iptables With the full path "/sbin/iptables". That Should also work well if you don't want To edit .bash_profile (why ever

Re: [CentOS] glibc

You can. just install it in a different location. On Jan 23, 2008 8:44 AM, Centos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > Can we have different version of glibc on the same server ? > > Thanks > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://li

[CentOS] Re: machine responsiveness with centos 5.1

I would recommend you install the systat rpm and then use sar and iostat commands to see if you can identify where the bottleneck is occurring. I installed sysstat and played with it a little - wasnt getting anywhere. I did some looking last night and came across a kernel tweak echo 10

[CentOS] glibc

Hello Can we have different version of glibc on the same server ? Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Wireless DELL M90 with CentOS 5.1

Hi, I have a laptop DELL M90 with an Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG card. After installed new rpm drivers (see below), my card is recognized and I can see my wireless acces point with (iwlist - iwconfig) but it's impossible to connect to it. It seem that I can't obtain an IP address. In the log me

[CentOS] Re: Why iptables are not working?

hi; the output of those commands are listed below... but i see that i cant reach to iptables if i am opening a console in Gnome(however i give su- command but still was the same problem)... But if I am opening directly the console with pressing ctrl+f1 and giving root and password of it than i can

Re: [CentOS] Why iptables are not working?

On 1/23/08, Tolun ARDAHANLI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in our server we dont have "iptables" command! and i am trying to install it > with that > > yum -y install iptables > > after this command it says that "...nothings to do". Do you have any > suggestion for installing the iptables? Then it's

Re: [CentOS] Why iptables are not working?

Tolun ARDAHANLI wrote: > Hi; > > in our server we dont have "iptables" command! and i am trying to install it > with that > > yum -y install iptables > > after this command it says that "...nothings to do". What does "ls -l /sbin/iptables" say? What is the output of "rpm -q iptables"? If both

[CentOS] Why iptables are not working?

Hi; in our server we dont have "iptables" command! and i am trying to install it with that yum -y install iptables after this command it says that "...nothings to do". Do you have any suggestion for installing the iptables? thanks a lot Note: CENTos 5.1 is istalled... -- Tolun ARDAHANLI

Re: [CentOS] How can i share my WAN ip to my LAN?

On Tuesday 22 January 2008 14:52:19 Alain Spineux wrote: > On Jan 22, 2008 3:17 PM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 14:49 +0100, Alain Spineux wrote: > > > On Jan 22, 2008 8:46 AM, Tolun ARDAHANLI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi everybody... > > > > > >

Re: [CentOS] How can i share my WAN ip to my LAN?

Hi again to everyone; Guys your mails are very nice... i liked all of them... let me give you about my system and my need(sorry for writing these late)... I've got an IBM x3650 server which is open 7d/24h. It has got 2 ethernet card. I would like to connect my LAN to WAN over this machine... LA