Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

Christopher Chan wrote: Marko A. Jennings wrote: Please take your excitement somewhere else. This list is definitely not an appropriate venue for it. What is the matter Mr. Jennings? Has the list been too slow for you today? WTF, Mark is right, the first post was good info, the rest should

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

Marko A. Jennings wrote: Please take your excitement somewhere else. This list is definitely not an appropriate venue for it. What is the matter Mr. Jennings? Has the list been too slow for you today? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

Fajar Priyanto wrote: ???u?op ?p?sdn ??? s?u??? ll? (: ???u s? pl?o? ??? ?o pu? ??? 'll? ?? It's on http://www.en.fliptext.net/ :) Hillarious :) Note - when I found this a few months ago, I sent an upside-down e-mail to my mom CC to dad. She uses Eudora Pro on Windows XP and it did not work, s

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and GCC Question

Garrick Staples wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:00:13PM +1300, Clint Dilks alleged: *snip* The '-static' means that the linker needs to find a static library archive to create a static executable. That means it wants to find /usr/lib/libmhash.a. Without the '-static', it would look

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

- "Marko A. Jennings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please take your excitement somewhere else. This list is definitely > not > an appropriate venue for it. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ce

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

Please take your excitement somewhere else. This list is definitely not an appropriate venue for it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

˙ʇsod snoıʌǝɹd ǝɥʇ uı ƃuıʇsod ɯoʇʇoq ɹoɟ sǝıƃolodɐ ǝɹǝɔuıs ʎɯ ʇdǝɔɔɐ ǝsɐǝld ˙ʇsod ɯoʇʇoq ʇou ʇsnɯ ǝuo 'uʍop ǝpısdn ƃuıʇsod uǝɥʍ ˙ʇɥƃıɹ ǝɹɐ noʎ griz_quattro wrote: When posting upside down, is top posting really bottom posting ? Where's the wiki ? What's the etiquette ? Christopher Chan wrote:

Re: [CentOS] password aging for openldap in Centos 4.5

On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 04:37 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > tblader wrote: > > Anyone have password aging working in Openldap 2.2.13-7 on Centos? > > The system continues to prompt for a new password regardless of > > whether it's been changed or not. > > Thanks > > Not sure how you are using openld

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

When posting upside down, is top posting really bottom posting ? Where's the wiki ? What's the etiquette ? Christopher Chan wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> My boss just caught me reading that stuff and he thought as I was >> looking at porn ! > > d-: ¡ɯǝɥʇ ɟo ǝlqısuodsǝɹɹı ʍoɥ ˙ʇuǝɯʎoldɯǝ ɟo

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My boss just caught me reading that stuff and he thought as I was looking at porn ! d-: ¡ɯǝɥʇ ɟo ǝlqısuodsǝɹɹı ʍoɥ ˙ʇuǝɯʎoldɯǝ ɟo ssol puɐ sʞɔǝu pǝʞooɹɔ sɐ ɥɔns suoıʇɔɐ ɹıǝɥʇ ɟo sǝɔuǝnbǝsuoɔ ǝɥʇ ɟo ʞuıɥʇ ʇou pıp ʎǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ ǝʌǝılǝq ʇouuɐɔ ı ¡ɯǝɥʇ ǝns ¡ʇlnɐɟ ɹıǝɥʇ sɐʍ ʇ

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

My boss just caught me reading that stuff and he thought as I was looking at porn ! Funny. - "Christopher Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fajar Priyanto wrote: > > ˙˙˙uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɹɐ sƃuıɥʇ llɐ > > (: ɹɐǝu sı plɹoʍ ǝɥʇ ɟo puǝ ǝɥʇ > > 'llɐ ıɥ > > > > It's on http://www.en.fliptext.net/ :)

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

¿ ʞɔǝu pǝʞɔıɹɔ ʎɯ ɹoɟ ǝns ı uɐɔ oɥʍ - "Christopher Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fajar Priyanto wrote: > > ˙˙˙uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɹɐ sƃuıɥʇ llɐ > > (: ɹɐǝu sı plɹoʍ ǝɥʇ ɟo puǝ ǝɥʇ > > 'llɐ ıɥ > > > > It's on http://www.en.fliptext.net/ :) > > > > Hillarious :) > > ˙sɹǝʇʇǝl lɐʇıdɐɔ ǝpnlɔuı ʇou

Re: [CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

Fajar Priyanto wrote: ˙˙˙uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɹɐ sƃuıɥʇ llɐ (: ɹɐǝu sı plɹoʍ ǝɥʇ ɟo puǝ ǝɥʇ 'llɐ ıɥ It's on http://www.en.fliptext.net/ :) Hillarious :) ˙sɹǝʇʇǝl lɐʇıdɐɔ ǝpnlɔuı ʇou pıp ʎǝɥʇ pɐq ooʇ ¿¡ǝdoɔ oʇ pǝsoddns sɹǝʞɔǝɥɔ llǝds ǝɹɐ ʍoɥ ˙ʇǝsǝdʎʇ uʍop-ǝpısdn pǝpnlɔuı sɹǝpoɔuǝ ʇɐǝɹƃ ɹno ʇɐɥʇ ʍouʞ

Re: [CentOS] kbs-CentOS-testing rsyslog unsigned, yum won't update it on 5.1

On Jan 8, 2008 5:31 PM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As the subject says. Just an FYI. > > -- > Bill Please see this post: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=12032&forum=37 Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and GCC Question

Garrick Staples wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:00:13PM +1300, Clint Dilks alleged: Hi People I am trying to build a piece of software from source in this case aide 0.13.1 using this config line ./configure --with-zlib --with-selinux. The configure step completes but there is a Warning

[CentOS] OT: writing upside down :)

˙˙˙uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɹɐ sƃuıɥʇ llɐ (: ɹɐǝu sı plɹoʍ ǝɥʇ ɟo puǝ ǝɥʇ 'llɐ ıɥ It's on http://www.en.fliptext.net/ :) Hillarious :) -- Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org 08:30:56 up 1:17, 2.6.22-14-generic GNU/Linux Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openo

[CentOS] kbs-CentOS-testing rsyslog unsigned, yum won't update it on 5.1

As the subject says. Just an FYI. -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and GCC Question

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:00:13PM +1300, Clint Dilks alleged: > Hi People > > I am trying to build a piece of software from source in this case aide > 0.13.1 using this config line ./configure --with-zlib --with-selinux. > The configure step completes but there is a Warning that concerns me.

[CentOS] CentOS and GCC Question

Hi People I am trying to build a piece of software from source in this case aide 0.13.1 using this config line ./configure --with-zlib --with-selinux. The configure step completes but there is a Warning that concerns me. This is taken from config.log configure:9809: checking for mhash_get_

Re: [CentOS] max mount count incovenient

Linux Man wrote: Hello group I added a new partition in fstab, and works without a problem. I used mkfs.ext3 to create the partition. My problem is that every 26 boots, the system tells that the partition have no been checked since 26 systems boots, ant start to check my new partition. This is a

Re: [CentOS] Probably OT: Has anyone else seen SeaMonkey 'pop' without warning?

MHR wrote: > On Jan 8, 2008 9:58 AM, Ben Mohilef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Shortyl after installing 1.1.7 on my 5.0 (and even since 5.1), I >>> noticed that every so often, >>> seemingly at random, although it appears most frequently when I >>> click on something that wants >> I have also expe

Re: [CentOS] max mount count incovenient

Works great! thanks to all !! :) It's a good choice to force be checked at boot time the partition "/"? 2008/1/8, Linux Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I read that man page before, but had not seen anything useful, shame on me :( > Do you say, for example, change mount count with tune2fs? > Thanks a

[CentOS] Hostap

Hi All Is there an easy way to add hostap support to centos 5 without recompiling the kernel, although I have a prism 2.5 card the stock install doesn't seem the allow this to be setup as an AP thanks in advance for the advice Robb ___ CentOS mail

Re: [CentOS] Probably OT: Has anyone else seen SeaMonkey 'pop' without warning?

fred smith wrote: Firefox does this to me quite frequently, and it always has. every new release they say they've improved the stability, but it hasn't made any improvement for me in terms of this issue. Firefox 2 works fine for me on Ubuntu 7.10, Ubuntu 7.04, Fedora 7 and Windows XP. -- Fl

Re: [CentOS] Error logs where?

> does any one know where the error log for the server would be in what dir? Most logs are in /var/log. Some specific logs might have further subdirectories such as /var/log/httpd. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailm

Re: [CentOS] Error logs where?

Christopher E wrote: Hello all, does any one know where the error log for the server would be in what dir? Thanks Christopher Hi Chris, Logs for your server/workstation can normally be found in /var/log unless otherwise configured in the program. Mark _

[CentOS] Re: Error logs where?

on 1/8/2008 2:05 PM Christopher E spake the following: Hello all, does any one know where the error log for the server would be in what dir? Thanks Christopher Maybe /var/log? -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't __

[CentOS] Error logs where?

Hello all, does any one know where the error log for the server would be in what dir? Thanks Christopher ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] max mount count incovenient

I read that man page before, but had not seen anything useful, shame on me :( Do you say, for example, change mount count with tune2fs? Thanks a lot Best regards 2008/1/8, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Linux Man wrote: > > Hello group > > I added a new partition in fstab, and works without

Re: [CentOS] Re: Fwd: Securing Linux laptops

--On Tuesday, January 08, 2008 11:39 AM -0800 Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One could also set up a script that automatically sends an e-mail message when the laptop boots, and perhaps periodic e-mails from cron. This could provide at least the IP address from which the mail was sent

Re: [CentOS] max mount count incovenient

Also try the fsck man page. Josh On Jan 8, 2008, at 2:35 PM, Chris Mauritz wrote: Linux Man wrote: Hello group I added a new partition in fstab, and works without a problem. I used mkfs.ext3 to create the partition. My problem is that every 26 boots, the system tells that the partition have

Re: [CentOS] max mount count incovenient

Quoting Linux Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello group > I added a new partition in fstab, and works without a problem. > I used mkfs.ext3 to create the partition. > My problem is that every 26 boots, the system tells that the partition > have no been checked since 26 systems boots, ant start to che

Re: [CentOS] max mount count incovenient

Linux Man wrote: Hello group I added a new partition in fstab, and works without a problem. I used mkfs.ext3 to create the partition. My problem is that every 26 boots, the system tells that the partition have no been checked since 26 systems boots, ant start to check my new partition. This is a

[CentOS] max mount count incovenient

Hello group I added a new partition in fstab, and works without a problem. I used mkfs.ext3 to create the partition. My problem is that every 26 boots, the system tells that the partition have no been checked since 26 systems boots, ant start to check my new partition. This is a lot of time consumi

Re: [CentOS] Xen clock drift

badclock# ksh ./xenclockdrift ntpd: time slew -0.000193s ntpd: time set -57.356377s ntpd: time slew +0.002352s ntpd: time slew +0.003018s ntpd: time set -57.417488s ntpd: time slew +0.012089s ntpd: time slew -0.000985s These domains are fully virtualized and set up identically, except "badclock

Re: [CentOS] Turning Wireless Radio on and off: how?

thad wrote: Have you try checking your bios if the wireless is default to off? I did go through there over the weekend and the setting is "enabled" which I interpret to mean "on". ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/ma

Re: [CentOS] Turning Wireless Radio on and off: how?

Alain Spineux wrote: On Jan 7, 2008 11:40 PM, Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alain Spineux wrote: On Jan 7, 2008 6:10 PM, Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I've got a Dell Inspiron 1501 with a Broadcom 1390 Wlan mini card (integrated) wireless lan chipset. I've got an ini

Re: [CentOS] Turning Wireless Radio on and off: how?

Clint Dilks wrote: Mark Weaver wrote: Alain Spineux wrote: On Jan 7, 2008 6:10 PM, Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I've got a Dell Inspiron 1501 with a Broadcom 1390 Wlan mini card (integrated) wireless lan chipset. I've got an init script setup to activate the wireless connect

[CentOS] Re: Fwd: Securing Linux laptops

on 1/8/2008 11:00 AM Bill Campbell spake the following: On Tue, Jan 08, 2008, Marko A. Jennings wrote: On Tue, January 8, 2008 9:14 am, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So what options do we have for encrypting partitions. I found this article helpful: http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/01/18/disk-e

Re: [CentOS] Probably OT: Has anyone else seen SeaMonkey 'pop' without warning?

On Jan 8, 2008 12:33 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > you mean seamonkey crashes, right? ie, all other seamonkey windows on > the box close? Can't say - I use the tabs and rarely ever have more than one SM window open. > I've been seeing that at home on a 32-bit centos 5 sy

Re: [CentOS] Probably OT: Has anyone else seen SeaMonkey 'pop' without warning?

On Jan 8, 2008 9:58 AM, Ben Mohilef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Shortyl after installing 1.1.7 on my 5.0 (and even since 5.1), I > > noticed that every so often, > > seemingly at random, although it appears most frequently when I > > click on something that wants > > I have also experienced th

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Securing Linux laptops

On Tue, Jan 08, 2008, Marko A. Jennings wrote: >On Tue, January 8, 2008 9:14 am, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> So what options do we have for encrypting partitions. > > >I found this article helpful: >http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/01/18/disk-encryption-in-fedora-past-present-and-future/ One co

RE: [CentOS] centos 5.1 kernel dump

Jerry Geis wrote: > > Below is a kernel dump that I just got. This is a fresh new > install of centos 5.1 on NVIDIA > gigabyte MB-GA-M61P-S3. nothing extra has been added. > > I have not tried the irqpoll but I am surprised to get this. > > Also the machine keeps running just hod this show on t

Re: [CentOS] Re: Log Monitoring Recomendation

On Tue, Jan 08, 2008, Ugo Bellavance wrote: >Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>Given my experience in Linux is limited currently, what do you guys use >>to monitor logs such as ?messages? on your centos servers? I had a >>hardware failure that happened in between me manually looking (of >>course?). I wo

[CentOS] Re: centos 5.1 kernel dump

It looks rather to do with a filesystem when a gfx card, can you reproduce, what are the steps? - Nicolas On Jan 8, 2008 6:25 PM, Jerry Geis http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>> wrote: >/ Below is a kernel dump that I just got. This is a fresh new install of />/ centos 5.1 on NV

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Securing Linux laptops

On Tue, January 8, 2008 9:14 am, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > So what options do we have for encrypting partitions. I found this article helpful: http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/01/18/disk-encryption-in-fedora-past-present-and-future/ ___ CentOS maili

Re: [CentOS] tar bug in CentOS 4.6?

David G. Miller wrote: Since upgrading my server from CentOS 4.5 to 4.6 I've been getting the following error from amanda backups: mutilate /home lev 1 FAILED [compress got signal 11, /bin/tar got signal 13] I was away from the house for most of the end of December and had a couple of othe

Re: [CentOS] tar bug in CentOS 4.6?

On Jan 8, 2008 7:00 PM, David G. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since upgrading my server from CentOS 4.5 to 4.6 I've been getting the > following error from amanda backups: > > mutilate /home lev 1 FAILED [compress got signal 11, /bin/tar got > signal 13] > > > I was away from the house fo

[CentOS] Re: Log Monitoring Recomendation

Joseph L. Casale wrote: Given my experience in Linux is limited currently, what do you guys use to monitor logs such as ‘messages’ on your centos servers? I had a hardware failure that happened in between me manually looking (of course…). I would hope it might have a some features to email crit

[CentOS] tar bug in CentOS 4.6?

Since upgrading my server from CentOS 4.5 to 4.6 I've been getting the following error from amanda backups: mutilate /home lev 1 FAILED [compress got signal 11, /bin/tar got signal 13] I was away from the house for most of the end of December and had a couple of other issues that came up th

Re: [CentOS] Probably OT: Has anyone else seen SeaMonkey 'pop' without warning?

> Shortyl after installing 1.1.7 on my 5.0 (and even since 5.1), I > noticed that every so often, > seemingly at random, although it appears most frequently when I > click on something that wants I have also experienced this problem and characterized it briefly by unscientific trial and error (

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.1 kernel dump

It looks rather to do with a filesystem when a gfx card, can you reproduce, what are the steps? - Nicolas On Jan 8, 2008 6:25 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Below is a kernel dump that I just got. This is a fresh new install of > centos 5.1 on NVIDIA > gigabyte MB-GA-M61P-S3. noth

[CentOS] centos 5.1 kernel dump

Below is a kernel dump that I just got. This is a fresh new install of centos 5.1 on NVIDIA gigabyte MB-GA-M61P-S3. nothing extra has been added. I have not tried the irqpoll but I am surprised to get this. Also the machine keeps running just hod this show on the console... Any ideas??? Jerry

Re: [CentOS] Problem with CentOS 5.1/xen/RTL8110

On Jan 8, 2008 5:22 PM, Joseph L. Casale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Chris, > > > >I got the impression that the network setup is as this example: > > > >Your laptop (192.168.1.x/255.255.255.0) > > > >Router (192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0) > > > >Xen (192.168.1.x/255.255.255.0) > > > >Well, you can

Re: [CentOS] Problem with CentOS 5.1/xen/RTL8110

> I am following this thread with interest as a system I was about to setup is > using the same driver and in the same networking scenario! Then, you'd want to subscribed to the centos-virt mailing list: http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt I believe this subject has been moved o

RE: [CentOS] Problem with CentOS 5.1/xen/RTL8110

>Chris, > >I got the impression that the network setup is as this example: > >Your laptop (192.168.1.x/255.255.255.0) > >Router (192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0) > >Xen (192.168.1.x/255.255.255.0) > >Well, you can't route from one physical network to another over a route

Re: [CentOS] yum update download only?

On Jan 8, 2008 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > > Johnny Hughes ha scritto: > >> Kenneth Porter wrote: > >>> Googling for this feature, I saw reports from the yum developer that > it > >>> wasn't yet implemented. This was in mailing list posts from a y

Re: [CentOS] password aging for openldap in Centos 4.5

On Jan 8, 2008 11:37 AM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tblader wrote: > > Anyone have password aging working in Openldap 2.2.13-7 on Centos? > > The system continues to prompt for a new password regardless of > > whether it's been changed or not. > > Thanks > > Not sure how you are us

Re: [CentOS] Xen clock drift

> From: Jack Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Jan 8, 2008 3:17 AM > To: centos@centos.org > > Hello All, > > Consider a CentOS-5.1 Xen server (2.6.18-53.1.4.el5xen) hosting two > domains running CentOS-5.1 (2.6.18-53.1.4.el5). One domain has a fairly > accurate clock, the other domain has a cloc

[CentOS] Fwd: Securing Linux laptops

http://www.linux.com/feature/123579 Feature: Wireless & Mobile Securing Linux laptops By Rick Cook on January 07, 2008 (9:00:00 PM) Print Comments Laptop and notebooks are being stolen at an ever-increasing rate. In 2004, Safeware Insurance which sells computer insurance, estimated 600,000 la

Re: [CentOS] Xen clock drift

On Jan 8, 2008 5:05 AM, Rick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2008 4:51 AM, Rick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jack Bailey wrote: > >>> These domains are fully virtualized and set up identically, except > >>> "badclock" is allocated two processors versu

Re: [CentOS] Problem with CentOS 5.1/xen/RTL8110

Chris Gow wrote: > Hello: > > I'm having issues with my CentOS 5.1/Xen installation. If I run the just want to remind people that there is a centos-virt list which was setup to address just these sort of issues. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CentOS] Xen clock drift

Rick Barnes wrote: > > Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Jan 8, 2008 4:51 AM, Rick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Jack Bailey wrote: These domains are fully virtualized and set up identically, except "badclock" is allocated two processors versus one processor for "goodclock". DomU's c

Re: [CentOS] Problem with CentOS 5.1/xen/RTL8110

On Jan 8, 2008 2:04 PM, Chris Gow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello: > > I'm having issues with my CentOS 5.1/Xen installation. If I run the > xen-bridge, I seem to get flaky ethernet. By flaky I mean everything seems > fine from the host machine, but if I attempt to contact the host machine > fr

Re: [CentOS] Xen clock drift

Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Jan 8, 2008 4:51 AM, Rick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jack Bailey wrote: >>> These domains are fully virtualized and set up identically, except >>> "badclock" is allocated two processors versus one processor for >>> "goodclock". DomU's clock is running normally. >

[CentOS] Problem with CentOS 5.1/xen/RTL8110

Hello: I'm having issues with my CentOS 5.1/Xen installation. If I run the xen-bridge, I seem to get flaky ethernet. By flaky I mean everything seems fine from the host machine, but if I attempt to contact the host machine from another remote machine (eg. my laptop which is on the same subnet a

Re: [CentOS] Xen clock drift

On Jan 8, 2008 4:51 AM, Rick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jack Bailey wrote: > > These domains are fully virtualized and set up identically, except > > "badclock" is allocated two processors versus one processor for > > "goodclock". DomU's clock is running normally. > > > > Anyone know what

Re: [CentOS] Xen clock drift

Jack Bailey wrote: > These domains are fully virtualized and set up identically, except > "badclock" is allocated two processors versus one processor for > "goodclock". DomU's clock is running normally. > > Anyone know what's going or know how to fix it? This is a known issue that has come up on

Re: [CentOS] Turning Wireless Radio on and off: how?

On Jan 7, 2008 11:40 PM, Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alain Spineux wrote: > > On Jan 7, 2008 6:10 PM, Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I've got a Dell Inspiron 1501 with a Broadcom 1390 Wlan mini card > >> (integrated) wireless lan chipset. I've got an init

Re: [CentOS] yum update download only?

Johnny Hughes ha scritto: Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: Johnny Hughes ha scritto: Kenneth Porter wrote: Googling for this feature, I saw reports from the yum developer that it wasn't yet implemented. This was in mailing list posts from a year or more ago. Did it ever make it into the yum code? I wa

Re: [CentOS] password aging for openldap in Centos 4.5

tblader wrote: > Anyone have password aging working in Openldap 2.2.13-7 on Centos? > The system continues to prompt for a new password regardless of > whether it's been changed or not. > Thanks Not sure how you are using openldap for authentication ... but if you are doing it via samba+openldap,

Re: [CentOS] yum update download only?

Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > Johnny Hughes ha scritto: >> Kenneth Porter wrote: >>> Googling for this feature, I saw reports from the yum developer that it >>> wasn't yet implemented. This was in mailing list posts from a year or >>> more ago. Did it ever make it into the yum code? >>> >>> I want to s

Re: [CentOS] Probably OT: Has anyone else seen SeaMonkey 'pop' without warning?

MHR wrote: I sent a bug report to Mozilla about this, but I was hoping someone here might have an insight on this. I use SeaMonkey as my default browser (32-bit even though I'm running x86_64 CentOS 5.1), version 1.1.7. Shortyl after installing 1.1.7 on my 5.0 (and even since 5.1), I notic

[CentOS] Xen clock drift

Hello All, Consider a CentOS-5.1 Xen server (2.6.18-53.1.4.el5xen) hosting two domains running CentOS-5.1 (2.6.18-53.1.4.el5). One domain has a fairly accurate clock, the other domain has a clock that gains ungodly amounts of time, roughly one minute every two or three minutes. For a fix, on