- Original Message -
From: "Frank Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 3:42:56 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane
Subject: Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:32:37 +1000 (EST)
"[EMA
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:32:37 +1000 (EST)
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You have another computer, which, I presume, is exactly the same as the
> 'live' one ?
In this application, I have five computers. Four of them are in use, running
24/7, doing four different jobs ranging
Frank Cox wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:44:38 +1000 (EST)
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you thought about virtualization ? What hardware are you planning on
running this on ?
It's a new Intel Pentium Core 2 machine.
I don't want to complicate this thing any mor
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 2:55:49 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane
Subject: Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:48:57 +1000 (EST)
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROT
on 12/17/2007 1:46 PM Steve Thompson spake the following:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, MHR wrote:
We'll have plenty of company, and make the devil's life miserable
(just wait
until he needs an upgrade!)
The devil probably runs Windows :)
-s
I thought the devil runs Microsoft! ;-D
--
MailSca
on 12/17/2007 7:09 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake the following:
What is a VCR?
It is a tivo with a tape drive ;-P
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
Also don't forget that many mirrors offer rsync. If you rename your
5.0 DVD to the 5.1 version and do an rsync it will save lots of
bandwidth.
I could be tired, but could you please elaborate how this is possible?
A dvd iso with X numb
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:48:57 +1000 (EST)
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand what you are trying to achieve. Some sort of (poor mans)
> redundancy at the hard disk level
A spare computer that can be swapped in to replace any of 4 other computers
without requiring
Thanks a lot
when I get the programs an tested I'll tell you about
thanks again
El lun, 17-12-2007 a las 20:38 -0800, James A. Peltier escribió:
> Manuel Enrique Chavez Manzano wrote:
> > El lun, 17-12-2007 a las 20:25 -0800, James A. Peltier escribió:
> >
> >> Manuel Enrique Chavez Manzano wr
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 2:43:08 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane
Subject: Re: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:52:59 -0600
Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 10:52:59 Frank Cox wrote:
> It's a new Intel Pentium Core 2 machine.
>
> I don't want to complicate this thing any more than I have to. I want to
> be able to put this machine in the corner and tell the guy who owns the
> place that if his webserver quits, he can put th
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:52:59 -0600
Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't want to complicate this thing any more than I have to. I want to be
> able to put this machine in the corner and tell the guy who owns the place
> that if his webserver quits, he can put the spare online and hit "1
Manuel Enrique Chavez Manzano wrote:
El lun, 17-12-2007 a las 20:25 -0800, James A. Peltier escribió:
Manuel Enrique Chavez Manzano wrote:
Is there any programs like Virtual Dj on linux, I mean a software that
allow me to mix music like a Dj
--
El lun, 17-12-2007 a las 20:25 -0800, James A. Peltier escribió:
> Manuel Enrique Chavez Manzano wrote:
> > Is there any programs like Virtual Dj on linux, I mean a software that
> > allow me to mix music like a Dj
> >
> >
On Monday, December 17, 2007 7:05 PM -0800 Robert Arkiletian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also don't forget that many mirrors offer rsync. If you rename your
5.0 DVD to the 5.1 version and do an rsync it will save lots of
bandwidth.
That surprises me. Won't similar RPM's in the two images likel
James A. Peltier wrote:
Manuel Enrique Chavez Manzano wrote:
Is there any programs like Virtual Dj on linux, I mean a software that
allow me to mix music like a Dj
___
CentOS
Manuel Enrique Chavez Manzano wrote:
Is there any programs like Virtual Dj on linux, I mean a software that
allow me to mix music like a Dj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@cent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why use torrents? With torrents I get around 25Kb/sec.
the port your client is using for torrent should be enabled in any
firewalls (and if you're being NAT, it should be forwarded). If i'm in
a corporate environment where this is impossible, I'll use a shell
s
Is there any programs like Virtual Dj on linux, I mean a software that
allow me to mix music like a Dj
--
"Nuestra recompensa se encuentra en el esfuerzo y no en el resultado.
Un esfuerzo total es una victoria completa".
Mahatma Gandhi
(@ @)
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:44:38 +1000 (EST)
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you thought about virtualization ? What hardware are you planning on
> running this on ?
It's a new Intel Pentium Core 2 machine.
I don't want to complicate this thing any more than I have to. I want
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1:20:01 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane
Subject: [CentOS] "multi-boot" drive partitioning
I want to set up a multiple "mode" computer with four separate Centos
installa
I want to set up a multiple "mode" computer with four separate Centos
installations on it. The objective here is to have a "spare computer" that I
can boot up into any of four "modes" depending on what I'm swapping it in for a
the moment. For example, I want to be able to boot it up as a webserve
On Dec 17, 2007 5:16 PM, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Monday, December 17, 2007 4:58 PM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Why use torrents? With torrents I get around 25Kb/sec.
>
> Sounds like something is throttling your torrent connection. Start by using
> a non-standard to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why use torrents? With torrents I get around 25Kb/sec.
With places such as utah.edu [I am in North America] I got
320Kb/sec steady. It took me 3hr and a bit to download the 5.1
dvd. As far as I understand it, Utah and the other mirrors donated
the bandwidth to the commu
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 02:30 +0200, юрка олейников wrote:
> i have CentOS 4.5 with OpenLDAP 2.2.13. OpenLDAP contains users with
> SSHA-ed and CRYPT-ed passwords.
> the one and ugly thing is that users with CRYPT-ed passwords cannot
> bind to this LDAP server. however users with SSHA passwords do ca
--On Monday, December 17, 2007 4:58 PM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why use torrents? With torrents I get around 25Kb/sec.
Sounds like something is throttling your torrent connection. Start by using
a non-standard torrent port to escape traffic shaping by naive throttles.
With places suc
--On Tuesday, December 18, 2007 12:30 AM + Karanbir Singh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we've just had a long conversation on the list about exactly what a
centos minor release means, so keeping that in context - why exactly
would someone want to download 5.0 when 5.0 + updates is 5.1 ?
In m
Why use torrents? With torrents I get around 25Kb/sec.
With places such as utah.edu [I am in North America] I got
320Kb/sec steady. It took me 3hr and a bit to download the 5.1
dvd. As far as I understand it, Utah and the other mirrors donated
the bandwidth to the community.
--
Thanks
http://w
Is there any programs like Virtual Dj on linux, I mean a software that
allow me to mix music like a Dj
El lun, 17-12-2007 a las 06:58 -0500, Chris Mauritz escribió:
> I checked Best Buy again. The second system I recommended is in stock
> at the Best Buy in Warwick. It's on sale for $353.
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
We only have the latest (5.1, 4.6) isos on the tracker now.
Does it place much load on the tracker to leave the older torrents listed?
we've just had a long conversation on the list about exactly what a
centos minor release means, so
i have CentOS 4.5 with OpenLDAP 2.2.13. OpenLDAP contains users with SSHA-ed
and CRYPT-ed passwords.
the one and ugly thing is that users with CRYPT-ed passwords cannot bind to
this LDAP server. however users with SSHA passwords do can.
is there any solution without recompiling anyhting?
--
Be Se
Kenneth Porter wrote:
>> We only have the latest (5.1, 4.6) isos on the tracker now.
>
> Does it place much load on the tracker to leave the older torrents listed?
we've just had a long conversation on the list about exactly what a
centos minor release means, so keeping that in context - why exac
--On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:24 PM -0600 Johnny Hughes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We only have the latest (5.1, 4.6) isos on the tracker now.
Does it place much load on the tracker to leave the older torrents listed?
The connection error I'm seeing seems to be some kind of firewall block
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 17:24 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > --On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:10 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the
> >> DVD. My normal dnld from a mirr
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:10 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the
>> DVD. My normal dnld from a mirror travels appx. 600Mb/sec.
>>
>> I'll wait until most of the U.S. g
Fixed it:
The config.log showed it pointing to stuff that was in libjped-devel and
libpng-devel, not libgd. Once yum'd those, I could ./configure ok.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--On Monday, December 17, 2007 5:10 PM -0500 "William L. Maltby"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the
DVD. My normal dnld from a mirror travels appx. 600Mb/sec.
I'll wait until most of the U.S. goes home before I give up and use th
Robert - elists napsal(a):
> Usually I am one of the first ones to do it
>
> I have resisted this time...
>
> It is almost the Holidays and out centos 4 boxes have been online for like 2
> years or whatever
>
> Has anyone boldly taken the plunge on any high use and/or Internet facing
> Centos$ s
Robert - elists pisze:
Usually I am one of the first ones to do it
I have resisted this time...
It is almost the Holidays and out centos 4 boxes have been online for like 2
years or whatever
Has anyone boldly taken the plunge on any high use and/or Internet facing
Centos$ servers and done a
y
On Dec 17, 2007 1:50 PM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps the libgd version in Red Hat doesn't support the gdMalloc in
> > Perfparse because of this security advisory?
>
> No. For centos4 you need xorg-x11-libs and xorg-x11-devel.
Both of those are already installed from yum als
Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the
DVD. My normal dnld from a mirror travels appx. 600Mb/sec.
I'll wait until most of the U.S. goes home before I give up and use the
normal download though.
Here's hoping...
--
Bill
_
On Dec 17, 2007 4:55 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gcc is installed:
Yep, but not the other bits to gcc. Do 'yum list gcc\*' to see all the
available gcc packages. It should become readily apparent which one
you need.
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:55:55PM -0600, Frank M. Ramaekers alleged:
> I'm attempting to install a product and it's failing the compiler check.
>
> CentOS 5.1
>
> + echo='/bin/echo -e'
> + rm -rf configure-tmp
> + mkdir configure-tmp
> + tmp_file=configure-tmp/xxx
> + makedirs=.
> + /bin/echo -e
I'm attempting to install a product and it's failing the compiler check.
CentOS 5.1
+ echo='/bin/echo -e'
+ rm -rf configure-tmp
+ mkdir configure-tmp
+ tmp_file=configure-tmp/xxx
+ makedirs=.
+ /bin/echo -e 'Checking C++ compiler... \c'
Checking C++ compiler... + cat
+ CXX=unknown
+ for i in '"C
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 01:17:31PM -0800, Robert - elists alleged:
> Usually I am one of the first ones to do it
>
> I have resisted this time...
>
> It is almost the Holidays and out centos 4 boxes have been online for like 2
> years or whatever
>
> Has anyone boldly taken the plunge on any hig
On Dec 17, 2007 4:10 PM, Rogelio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 11:17 AM, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # yum list libXpm-devel
Which version or centos are you using again? libXpm-devel is for
centos 5. For centos 4 it's a different package.
> Perhaps the libgd ver
> Has anyone boldly taken the plunge on any high use and/or Internet facing
> Centos$ servers and done a
>
> yum update
The only problem I had was the amount of disk space that was required
meant that the install phase failed. So "yum update" would download all
the rpm's but then fail. Once I w
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, MHR wrote:
We'll have plenty of company, and make the devil's life miserable (just wait
until he needs an upgrade!)
The devil probably runs Windows :)
-s
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mail
CentOS-5.1
I need some help with setting up the SELinux context for a custom httpd
directory so that I can write log files into it. This is what I have:
In my virtual host config file:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteLog /etc/httpd/virtual.d/trac-rewrite.log
# RewriteLogLevel 0=off 1=basic 2=ver
Usually I am one of the first ones to do it
I have resisted this time...
It is almost the Holidays and out centos 4 boxes have been online for like 2
years or whatever
Has anyone boldly taken the plunge on any high use and/or Internet facing
Centos$ servers and done a
yum update
or a
yum -y u
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:02:29PM -0800, Rogelio alleged:
> On Dec 17, 2007 11:36 AM, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Don't guess, just test it:
> > yum --noplugins --disablerepo=freshrpms list libXpm-devel
>
>
> (my repos)
>
> ls -al /etc/yum.repos.d/
> CentOS-Base.repo Ce
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 01:10:24PM -0800, Rogelio alleged:
> On Dec 17, 2007 11:17 AM, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > # yum list libXpm-devel
>
>
> Perhaps the libgd version in Red Hat doesn't support the gdMalloc in
> Perfparse because of this security advisory?
Don't get sid
On Dec 17, 2007 11:17 AM, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # yum list libXpm-devel
Perhaps the libgd version in Red Hat doesn't support the gdMalloc in
Perfparse because of this security advisory?
http://osvdb.org/show/osvdb/11760
___
Cent
On Dec 17, 2007 11:36 AM, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't guess, just test it:
> yum --noplugins --disablerepo=freshrpms list libXpm-devel
(my repos)
ls -al /etc/yum.repos.d/
CentOS-Base.repo CentOS-Media.repo mirrors-rpmforge rpmforge.repo
(your command)
yum --noplug
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 7:49 AM, Ross S. W. Walker
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a 5.1 system with Xen installed. The package says
> 3.0.3, but an 'xm
> > info' shows 3.1.
> >
> > So what is it? Is it 3.0.3 patched to 3.1 or is it 3.1
> package
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:52:59AM -0600, Jerome alleged:
> Hi all
> I don't know if it's the right place to ask for this problem.
> I just install my server with centos4.5, using PXE/http protocol. ALl
> goes very well. My asking is that i need a customized kernel to use all
> of the posibilitie
On Dec 17, 2007 11:17 AM, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # yum list libXpm-devel
Is it possible that yum-plugin-priorities is preventing me from seeing
things that were installed in base (such as this?)
http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities
I installed that whe
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:43:54AM -0800, Rogelio alleged:
> On Dec 17, 2007 11:17 AM, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > # yum list libXpm-devel
> > ...
> > Available Packages
> > libXpm-devel.i3863.5.5-3base
> >
> >
> > Just install it with y
On Dec 17, 2007 11:17 AM, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # yum list libXpm-devel
> ...
> Available Packages
> libXpm-devel.i3863.5.5-3base
>
>
> Just install it with yum.
I don't have that, and I suspect it's because I'm using DAG and/or perh
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:03:37AM -0800, Rogelio alleged:
> On Dec 17, 2007 10:44 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 17, 2007 1:36 PM, Rogelio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Those are there:
> > >
> > >
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4.11
> > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4
>
>
> I see the libXpm-devel rpm here, but not for CentOS 4.x
>
> http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=libxpm-devel
>
>
> And here is one for the i386 platform. Is that good?
>
>
> ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/fedora/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/libXpm-devel-3.5.6-1.i386.rpm
>
> Just f
On Dec 17, 2007 7:49 AM, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I have a 5.1 system with Xen installed. The package says 3.0.3, but an 'xm
> info' shows 3.1.
>
> So what is it? Is it 3.0.3 patched to 3.1 or is it 3.1 packaged as 3.0.3?
> And if it's the former, does anybody have an
On Dec 17, 2007 10:44 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 1:36 PM, Rogelio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Those are there:
> >
> >
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4.11
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4
>
> No, /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 is different from /usr/lib/libXpm.so
>
On Dec 17, 2007 1:36 PM, Rogelio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those are there:
>
>
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4.11
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4
No, /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 is different from /usr/lib/libXpm.so
One is provided by libXpm, which you have, but the file you need is
provided by li
On Dec 17, 2007 9:14 AM, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The line breaks were lost in the output, the above is cleaned up.
>
> When we went through this a few weeks ago and this looks like the same
> problem:
> missing libXpm.so.
Those are there:
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4.11
/usr/
On Dec 17, 2007 4:07 AM, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note to self: Check 'TO:' again before clicking 'Send'
>
> We just wouldn't be starting a Monday off right if I weren't poking
> fun at someone elses simple misfortunes Yes, I know I'm going to
> hell :-P
>
We'll have plenty of
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:02:22AM -0800, Rogelio alleged:
> On Dec 16, 2007 4:45 PM, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As the configure output shows, /usr/bin/gdlib-config is there. There is
> > nothing to install to get /usr/bin/gdlib-config.
> >
> > You have to look at config.lo
Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 6:59 AM, Steve Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any advice as to how to fix whatever was broken in the course of doing the
upgrade?
After any upgrade it's always good to run
updatedb
locate .rpmsave
locate .rpmnew
and then compare those files to the ones
On Dec 17, 2007 6:59 AM, Steve Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any advice as to how to fix whatever was broken in the course of doing the
> upgrade?
After any upgrade it's always good to run
updatedb
locate .rpmsave
locate .rpmnew
and then compare those files to the ones they might have re
Filipe,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:59:52AM -0500, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 9:47 AM, Maxim Soldatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's the behaviour that chroot is supposed to have.
Do not think so.
I've been using chroot for a while and on a
Again, sorry for the misdirected email everyone. Good thing it wasn't
to my girlfriendwhat would my wife think about that as she googles
my name?!!?! hehe (Honey, I kid I swear!!!)
Reminds me of that 17th (?) century toast: "To our wives and lovers: may
they never meet.".
-s
__
Dennis McLeod wrote:
What's the first recommendation?
It was something for about the same price from Sony, but I'm afraid if I
recommended that slashdot.com will null route my home IP address.
:D
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://l
What's the first recommendation?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Chris Mauritz
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 3:59 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Home Theater Thing
I checked Best Buy again. The second system I recommended
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is a VCR?
It's an ancient thinking machine typically installed over a television
set (not to be confused with a plasma or LCD screen like we have in
modern timesI'm talking 60kg of honest-to-goodness picture tube, m8)
that was often used to tell time. Pe
HA HA HA
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nicolas Sahlqvist
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 7:14 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Home Theater Thing
On Dec 17, 2007 4:09 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is a VCR?
http://
On Dec 17, 2007 4:09 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is a VCR?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VCR
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chris Mauritz
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 5:08 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re:
What is a VCR?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Mauritz
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 5:08 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Home Theater Thing
Jim Perrin wrote:
>
> Will you help us install it to? :-P
>
Hey,
On Dec 16, 2007 4:45 PM, Garrick Staples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the configure output shows, /usr/bin/gdlib-config is there. There is
> nothing to install to get /usr/bin/gdlib-config.
>
> You have to look at config.log to find the actual reason.
Here is a blip from config.log that migh
On Dec 17, 2007 9:47 AM, Maxim Soldatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got strange problem with centos (as well as rhel btw) chrooted
> environment.
That's the behaviour that chroot is supposed to have.
> Yes, I even do not have /etc/ directory inside testcase/ , but id shows
> groups from
Since updating from 4.5 to 4.6 yesterday, I am getting a lot of CUPS
errors. The error.log file is filling up with these messages:
get_printer_attrs: resource name '/printers/printers' no good!
And the access.log seems to be being polled often too, even in the absence
of any print jobs
I have a 5.1 system with Xen installed. The package says 3.0.3, but an 'xm
info' shows 3.1.
So what is it? Is it 3.0.3 patched to 3.1 or is it 3.1 packaged as 3.0.3? And
if it's the former, does anybody have any idea why upstream wouldn't just
deploy 3.1 (now 3.1.2) which is more stable?
-Ros
Hello,
I've got strange problem with centos (as well as rhel btw) chrooted
environment.
First of all I created simple directory with only the libs for 'bash'
and 'id' tools:
# chroot testcase/
bash-3.1# id
uid=0 gid=0 groups=0,1,2,3,4,6,10
Yes, I even do not have /etc/ directory insid
No it probably would not provide the performance unless run on 10 Gbe. Of
course that depends on the number of write transactions, 1Gbe maxs around
100MB/s, so if you need faster performance look elsewhere.
I doubt it's reliability too, nbd is a simple protocol, but as such doesn't
provide for
On Dec 17, 2007 9:34 AM, Filipe Brandenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2.6 kernels, I always used to issue the commands directly:
>
This was actually introduced in CentOS 4.3 (and upstream RHEL4.3):
http://www.centos.org/docs/4/html/release-notes/as-x86/RELEASE-NOTES-U3-en.html#id3641770
Hi,
On 2.6 kernels, I always used to issue the commands directly:
1) Find what's the host number for the HBA:
ls /sys/class/fc_host/
(You'll have something like host1 or host2, I'll refer to them as
host$NUMBER from now on)
2) Ask the HBA to issue a LIP signal to rescan the FC bus:
echo 1 >/s
Try setting a manual MAC address on the bond interface that is different then
any of the physical ones.
-Ross
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Mon Dec 17 07:44:21 2007
Subject: [CentOS] Bonding problem in CENTOS4
I use bonding
Jim Perrin wrote:
Will you help us install it to? :-P
Hey, what's a geek son to do? My folks can't even set the time on their
VCR. It is, after all, the holiday season. It also makes it a lot more
bearable for their son to have some A/V distractions on those long
family visits. :)
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 04:45 -0800, Steven Vishoot wrote:
> --- Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Chris Mauritz wrote:
> >
> > oops.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> another one of those misguided emails. :-D
Guided mismails? :-O
___
CentOS mailin
--- Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Mauritz wrote:
>
> oops.
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
another one of those misguided emails. :-D
I use bonding under CENTOS4.5 x32_62.
I have these weird messages when I'm restarting network.
Do you have any ideas how to fix this?
(there is similar bug for centos5 http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2404, but
the author says that it worked for him in centos4...)
Thanks
Vitaly
Dec 17 08:34
Note to self: Check 'TO:' again before clicking 'Send'
On Dec 17, 2007 6:58 AM, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I checked Best Buy again. The second system I recommended is in stock
> at the Best Buy in Warwick. It's on sale for $353. :)
Hmmm, that actually looks like a decent syst
Chris Mauritz wrote:
oops.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
I checked Best Buy again. The second system I recommended is in stock
at the Best Buy in Warwick. It's on sale for $353. :)
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8254569&type=product&id=1169512522677
I'm thinking about getting out of Dodge today to unwind so if you pick
it up early
Hi Thomas,
On Dec 17, 2007 10:56 AM, Bleier Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently thinking about similar configurations, and (also for cost
> reasons :-) am also thinking about GNBD with two standard servers as a
> "poor man" redundant storage - but I'm wondering if that g
Hi all,
I'm currently thinking about similar configurations, and (also for cost
reasons :-) am also thinking about GNBD with two standard servers as a
"poor man" redundant storage - but I'm wondering if that gives enough
performance for running databases (in my case Oracle) on top of it. The
confi
96 matches
Mail list logo
