On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 06:12:57PM -0500, R P Herrold alleged:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, Rogelio wrote:
>
> >problem that was a result of "yum remove gd", I formatted the box and
> >reinstalled everything.
>
> >"checking for gdlib-config... /usr/bin/gdlib-config
> >checking for gdMalloc in -lgd... n
On Dec 16, 2007 6:18 PM, Rogelio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already did install that.
This is information which would have helped first, so we wouldn't
provide you with unhelpful recomendations.
What I'd like to see out of the config.log is where it includes the gd
files, not where it tries
Karanbir Singh wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
Sorry all, my mind was obviously not where it should have been this
morning. What I meant to say is, there will still be a CentOS 5.1 for
IA64 coming soon too, right?
yes
Ohhh, oohhh, ohhh, i'm so excited
__
>
> /usr/bin/gdlib-config is owned by package: gd-devel
>
> Install that with yum, and it should work as to _that_ test.
I already did install that.
see:
rpm -qa | grep gd
gd-devel-2.0.28-5.4E
gd-progs-2.0.28-5.4E
gdbm-1.8.0-24
sysklogd-1.4.1-26_EL
gd-2.0.28-5.4E
php-gd-4.3.9-3.22.9
__
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, Rogelio wrote:
problem that was a result of "yum remove gd", I formatted the box and
reinstalled everything.
"checking for gdlib-config... /usr/bin/gdlib-config
checking for gdMalloc in -lgd... no
/usr/bin/gdlib-config is owned by package: gd-devel
Install that with yu
I recently had a problem with the configure script from perfparse running
properly so that I could 'make install' it to work with Nagios 2.10 on
latest CentOS 4.x + RPMForge (see
http://readlist.com/lists/centos.org/centos/5/28966.html). Thinking it was a
problem that was a result of "yum remove gd
James A. Peltier wrote:
> Sorry all, my mind was obviously not where it should have been this
> morning. What I meant to say is, there will still be a CentOS 5.1 for
> IA64 coming soon too, right?
yes
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Sorry all, my mind was obviously not where it should have been this
morning. What I meant to say is, there will still be a CentOS 5.1 for
IA64 coming soon too, right?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/c
James A. Peltier wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
The CentOS development team is pleased to announce the release of CentOS
4.6 for i386, x86_64, s390, s390x and ia64.
It is available on all CentOS.org mirrors and via bittorrent, see this
link to download ISOs:
http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos
On Dec 16, 2007 1:21 PM, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There will still be a CentOS 5.1 release soon to though right?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
Already done mate
James A. Peltier wrote:
There will still be a CentOS 5.1 release soon to though right?
you mean... http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.1/ ?
been on the mirrors for a couple weeks at least.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.ce
Johnny Hughes wrote:
The CentOS development team is pleased to announce the release of CentOS
4.6 for i386, x86_64, s390, s390x and ia64.
It is available on all CentOS.org mirrors and via bittorrent, see this
link to download ISOs:
http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/4.6/isos/
This release co
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Bernard Lheureux wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 06:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
But in the 4.xx version when you do a 'cat /etc/redhat-release' it shows
you the version "CentOS release 4.5 (Final)" for example, now with
version 5 after the upgrade to version 5.1 if you do a
Bernard Lheureux wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 06:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
But in the 4.xx version when you do a 'cat /etc/redhat-release' it shows
you the version "CentOS release 4.5 (Final)" for example, now with
version 5 after the upgrade to version 5.1 if you do a
'cat /etc/redhat-rele
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 06:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
But in the 4.xx version when you do a 'cat /etc/redhat-release' it shows
you the version "CentOS release 4.5 (Final)" for example, now with
version 5 after the upgrade to version 5.1 if you do a
'cat /etc/redhat-release' it always shows "Cen
Anyone got this working in centos 5. If managed, then please
info how?
Especially how with KPPP I get it workin so far, that kppp says
modem ready, then starting initalizing modem, but newer get it
ready, nothin in logs, just keep on initalizing.
Jarmo
_
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have performed the 5.1 update via the 5 repo on a couple of systems.
> I then went to switch these systems to my new local repo using ther
> $releasever variable. It still has the value of 5, not 5.1
>
> Where is this set? Why was it not changed to 5.1?
>
Just to an
17 matches
Mail list logo
