--- FTNX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 08 December 2007 22:40, Mark Pryor
> wrote:
>
> > unless you tried to upgrade it from CPAN, I don't
> see
> > how you got out-of-sync.
>
> No. I had to learn the hard way not to use CPAN. I
> have two Centos 5 machines
> that have been updated
On Saturday 08 December 2007 22:40, Mark Pryor wrote:
> unless you tried to upgrade it from CPAN, I don't see
> how you got out-of-sync.
No. I had to learn the hard way not to use CPAN. I have two Centos 5 machines
that have been updated only with Yum, with the default repos + rpmforge.
They b
--- FTNX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where do I find an RPM for perl-File-Temp for Centos
> 5 that will work? At some
> point Perl got upgraded, and perl-File-Temp stopped
> working, killing
> amavisd-new. I've tried different versions, even
> from a src.rpm, but they
> won't install due to a
On Dec 8, 2007 5:37 PM, Olaf Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if login as user I get the following error message in
> ~/.xsession-errors*:
> /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession: line 15: unask: command not found
>
> Changing 'unask' to 'umask' seems to fix it. This happens under CentOS
> 5 and 5
Where do I find an RPM for perl-File-Temp for Centos 5 that will work? At some
point Perl got upgraded, and perl-File-Temp stopped working, killing
amavisd-new. I've tried different versions, even from a src.rpm, but they
won't install due to a conflict with Perl.
___
Hello,
if login as user I get the following error message in
~/.xsession-errors*:
/etc/X11/xinit/Xsession: line 15: unask: command not found
Changing 'unask' to 'umask' seems to fix it. This happens under CentOS
5 and 5.1.
regards
Olaf
___
CentOS mai
On Friday 07 December 2007, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> I'd be happy to host the rest of this conversation in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - which might actually have more people
> watching who play a role in these situations ?
There is one point that belongs in the user CentOS list (and not on
centos-devel)
On Dec 8, 2007 6:21 PM, Steven Vishoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So in general is there a way i can do multiple
> directories in one command or am i left with doing
> them each individual as in rsync -av server:/dir1/
> /dir1/
> and repeat for the rest of directories. or does
> someone know of a
David Evennou wrote:
Hi Dave,
I am experiencing the same problem on two of my systems running CentOS
5. I get an error message after a long timeout, "could not retrieve
mirrorlist". Please let me know if you find a way around this problem.
Thanks,
David
- Original Message - From: "D
Hello All,
I have an off topic question about rsync and was
wondering if i can get some kind person help with it.
I have two servers with each server have three same
directories on them /dir1/ /dir2/ /dir3/ . How would i
achieve this by using rsync?
I have tried rsync -avrt --delete server_ip:/di
Hi Dave,
I am experiencing the same problem on two of my systems running CentOS 5. I
get an error message after a long timeout, "could not retrieve mirrorlist".
Please let me know if you find a way around this problem.
Thanks,
David
- Original Message -
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 05:12:06PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> But it would be even better if we could live with the assumption that repos
> will have incompatibilities, whether accidental or intentional. Then it
> would become a choice of which to install and things wouldn't break when
> somew
Hello,
Today i ran a yum update and installed kernel 2.6.18.53.1 from
centosplus. I then rebooted to ensure i was running it. I was and went to
remove the previous kernel and kernel-devel packages v2.6.18.53 also from
centosplus. In both cases yum gets to the running transaction check then
on 12/7/2007 8:05 PM John Thomas spake the following:
Cough, cough, cough (I have a bit of a cold, please excuse me)
Oh great, now my MUA has a virus! ;-P
You need to cover your keyboard when you cough.
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if th
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Hello,
I have a few packages where the latest updated version in 5.0 is greater
than the current 5.1 version.
Here is the list: package, installed version (from 5.0 updates),
available (in 5.1)
flac
1.1.2-28.el5_0.1
1.1.2-27
flac-devel
1.1.2
on 12/7/2007 8:31 PM David Mackintosh spake the following:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 11:54:26AM -0500, David Mackintosh wrote:
I've recently replaced a RedHat EL 3.x system with a CentOS 5 system
(fully yum'd as of Tuesday). This was a full-pave install, although
we did copy the sendmail.mc from
Sorry, one more piece of the patch note was missing in my previous e-mail:
==
> ACK less the hz= bits for 5.1.z, per Alan's concern about only certain
> values in the currently accepted range actually being valid. I'd say
> fully bake that pa
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007, Les Mikesell wrote:
>Les Bell wrote:
>>Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>What's a 'trusted' forwarding mean as opposed to any other kind?
>><<
>>
>>A trusted X11 client will bypass the security controls specified in the X11
>>Security Extension Specification (see
>>
On Dec 8, 2007 2:18 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2007 8:52 AM, Scott McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just did. Note I made a typo and commented on that in a second post.
> > Does tick_divider work successfully in a 64bit installation? In the
> > changelog of t
Les Bell wrote:
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's a 'trusted' forwarding mean as opposed to any other kind?
<<
A trusted X11 client will bypass the security controls specified in the X11
Security Extension Specification (see
http://refspecs.freestandards.org/X11/security.pdf). In g
Amos Shapira wrote:
On 07/12/2007, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not doubting that -X will mostly work, but perhaps we should be
promoting the idea of -Y a bit more.
I'm totally with you about promoting security, but I got the
impression it's the other way around and -X is the
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a few packages where the latest updated version in 5.0 is greater
> than the current 5.1 version.
>
> Here is the list: package, installed version (from 5.0 updates),
> available (in 5.1)
>
> flac
> 1.1.2-28.el5_0.1
> 1.1.2-27
>
> flac-devel
> 1.1
Johnny Hughes wrote:
I have repeatedly asked people to take this conversation away from
this list. Is there really any point you are trying to make by
carrying on ?
its not that hard to just post a follow up on another list, both you
and rex are on the epel and the rpmforge lists. how about pic
Having done my fresh 5.0 install a couple months ago I'm slowly getting
things back in to working condition. Decided last night to try setting up
lmsensors.
Got it all set up (modules, etc taken care of) and it runs and reports
values, but some of 'em a clearly wrong with the default sensors.conf
Rainer Traut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Maybe, it's stupid question but I've just installed CentOS5 and when I'm
> going to edit some of my conf files I see no colors as it did in old
> CentOS4x...
> I'm using:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ echo $TERM
> xterm
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> Perhaps for CentOS 5 kickstarts I should just not include the network
> option at all in order to make the network configuration screen
> accessible inside the installer?
you can try run anaconda in debug mode to work out exactly what is going
on at what stage..
--
Karanb
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:10:59AM +0100, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> > Olaf Mueller wrote:
> >> after upgrade from CentOS 5 to 5.1 I see the following error
> >> in /var/log/messages:
> >> 'rpc.idmapd[2330]: main: open(/var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs/nfs): No such
> >> file or director
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reac
On 07/12/2007, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not doubting that -X will mostly work, but perhaps we should be
> promoting the idea of -Y a bit more.
I'm totally with you about promoting security, but I got the
impression it's the other way around and -X is the more secure one:
On Dec 6, 2007 8:52 AM, Scott McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just did. Note I made a typo and commented on that in a second post.
> Does tick_divider work successfully in a 64bit installation? In the
> changelog of the kernel installed on my test box (32bit) I see:
>
> - [x86] Fixes fo
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Olaf Mueller wrote:
>> after upgrade from CentOS 5 to 5.1 I see the following error
>> in /var/log/messages:
>> 'rpc.idmapd[2330]: main: open(/var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs/nfs): No such
>> file or directory'
>> The directory exists [...]
> Are you running the latest kernel from 5.
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> I have repeatedly asked people to take this conversation away from
>> this list. Is there really any point you are trying to make by
>> carrying on ?
>>
>> its not that hard to just post a follow up on another list, both you
>> and rex are on
Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after upgrade from CentOS 5 to 5.1 I see the following error
> in /var/log/messages:
> 'rpc.idmapd[2330]: main: open(/var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs/nfs): No such
> file or directory'
>
> The directory exists with the permissions
> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root0 Dec 7 10:21
33 matches
Mail list logo
