Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir

Very. We have a single Linux box facing the Internet which runs everything through postfix, amavisd, and clamav to weed out the phishing and worms that attack the Microsoft virus, Windows, then hands off messages that pass to the internal cluster using round-robin DNS as the poor-mans load bala

Re: [CentOS] How to delete mails in the mailq in ONE DAY -- POSTFIX

It should be one of these: > > bounce_queue_lifetime = 1d > maximal_queue_lifetime = 1d Hi, Thanks for your quick answer. I think it is maximal_queue_lifetime = 1d I got it from below URLs. http://www.postfix.org/rate.html *maximal_queue_lifetime* (default: 5 days) How long a message stays i

Re: [CentOS] How to delete mails in the mailq in ONE DAY -- POSTFIX

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: I am runnig posfix on Centos 4.4 as a Mailgateway. It only accepts mails for domains and then forwards mails to Lotus domino Server. All clients sends outgoing mails to that Lotus domino Server. Then , That Lotus Domino Server sends mails to Pos

[CentOS] How to delete mails in the mailq in ONE DAY -- POSTFIX

I am runnig posfix on Centos 4.4 as a Mailgateway. It only accepts mails for domains and then forwards mails to Lotus domino Server. All clients sends outgoing mails to that Lotus domino Server. Then , That Lotus Domino Server sends mails to Postfix mailgateway. This postfix mailgateway sends mail

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 distro: How to upgrade 5.0 to 5.1 with yum??

fred smith wrote: I'm coming in here kind of in the middle, but I find this discussion to be confusing... In the past I've always found that my centos/RHEL machines automagically updated themselves to the latest dot-release without me having to do anything other than run yum/up2date. Are you s

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir

On Fri, Nov 30, 2007, Christopher Chan wrote: >Bill Campbell wrote: >>On Thu, Nov 29, 2007, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: >>>On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:51:25AM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote: We haven't had any notable performance problems using this at a regional ISP customer's site with about 10,000

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir

Bill Campbell wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2007, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:51:25AM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote: We haven't had any notable performance problems using this at a regional ISP customer's site with about 10,000 e-mail users and several machines in a cluster deliveri

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 distro: How to upgrade 5.0 to 5.1 with yum??

On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 01:02:59AM +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote: > > Continue to install machines with Centos 5.0(!!) > >distro (not 5.1, 5.2, etc snapshots|subreleases), But > >have .../centos/5/updates/{SRPMS|i386|x86_64}/ > >repositories|directories which contains upd

RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developers box on centos 5

> > I think it's just too new and shiny. ccache is installed by default with > Fedora 8. > Wow, fedora 8? Where have I been? Sheesh, most of us are still dealing with considering centos 5 migrations from rock solid centos 4 "as necessary" eh? Isn't this fedora thing getting a little bit "cat

Re: [CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

Is there a way to know where grub is installed? I have a few servers running in RAID 1 software for /boot, I gotta fix this. If I can't tell whether it is installed or not, is it dangerous to re-install it using the command above? So long as you have all the necessary grub files, there i

[CentOS] ieee1394 firewire disk unable to see or mount [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

We have some LaCie 1 TB external disks which work fine on other Linux servers (running Red Hat 9, and Ubuntu 7.04), but which fail to be seen on our CentOS 4.3 system with kernel 2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4smp The interface card is a Sunix 64 bit Firewire 800 ieee1394b adapter plugged int

Re: [CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

Looks good. The important part is that it references the drive when doing the installation. What do you mean? The problem is that grub stage1 is loaded but its instructions for locating stage2 point it to another disk which may or may not be at the location stored. That was the problem wi

Re: [CentOS] special tricks for developers box on centos 5

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:25:47 -0800 Robert - elists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ccache does not appear to be part of the centos base or core or whatever you > wanna call it I think it's just too new and shiny. ccache is installed by default with Fedora 8. > Is there any downside to installing c

RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developers box on centos 5

ccache does not appear to be part of the centos base or core or whatever you wanna call it I see that karan and dag have it in their space Is there any downside to installing ccache? If so, in what terms? How about on an internet facing box? - rh _

Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h

On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 12:26 +1100, Amos Shapira wrote: > On 30/11/2007, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Find out how they got in and make sure that hole is fixed. > > Do an rpm verify on all installed packages (excluding > configs), reinstall th

Re: [CentOS] special tricks for developers box on centos 5

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:26:21 -0500 Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank - HEY that is fantastic Dropped complete compile from 27 > seconds to 14. > > I was not aware of this... Oddly enough, a lot of people don't seem to be aware of it. I think it's right up there with sliced brea

Re: [CentOS] special tricks for developers box on centos 5

Frank Cox wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:36:39 -0500 Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2 4

Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h

On 30/11/2007, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Find out how they got in and make sure that hole is fixed. > > Do an rpm verify on all installed packages (excluding configs), reinstall > the rpms that fail the verify. > > Find all binaries that are not accountable in rpm and nuke the

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 distro: How to upgrade 5.0 to 5.1 with yum??

Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote: Continue to install machines with Centos 5.0(!!) distro (not 5.1, 5.2, etc snapshots|subreleases), But have .../centos/5/updates/{SRPMS|i386|x86_64}/ repositories|directories which contains updates since 5.0 to current level. This way I only need to feed yum with two r

Re: [CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

My dell SC430 came with instructions on how to set up booting from software raid under RHEL. I can't find an online copy but this might help http://lists.us.dell.com/pipermail/linux-poweredge/2003-July/008898.html Normally before I move a machine from testing to production I like to do some tes

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 distro: How to upgrade 5.0 to 5.1 with yum??

--- Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote: > > > > The problem is whether there is a way to achieve > the > > following: > > > > Continue to install machines with Centos 5.0(!!) > > distro (not 5.1, 5.2, etc snapshots|subreleases), > But > > have .../centos/5/upda

Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h

Find out how they got in and make sure that hole is fixed. Do an rpm verify on all installed packages (excluding configs), reinstall the rpms that fail the verify. Find all binaries that are not accountable in rpm and nuke them. Harden your host with selinux and audit, keep audit logs of all c

Re: [CentOS] special tricks for developers box on centos 5

More importantly, mount your dev filesys with atimes disabled and ext3 indexing on. Use tmpfs for /tmp, /usr/tmp, /var/tmp, it uses swappable ram filesys which helps a lot too. Make sure nothing gets put in those tmp dirs that needs to persist across a reboot and limit the max size each can ta

Re: [CentOS] special tricks for developers box on centos 5

Jerry, --- Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just wondering if there are special tricks > people do > that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or > something else I dont > about that minimizes your compile time? I presently > have and AMD x2 > 4800+ with 2GIG ram. > > Just cur

Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:43:44 -0600 "B.J. McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a > Phishing scam. One of the problems with being r00ted is that you can never be sure that you have found all of the stuff that the bad guy left behind

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 distro: How to upgrade 5.0 to 5.1 with yum??

Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote: The problem is whether there is a way to achieve the following: Continue to install machines with Centos 5.0(!!) distro (not 5.1, 5.2, etc snapshots|subreleases), But have .../centos/5/updates/{SRPMS|i386|x86_64}/ repositories|directories which contains updates since

Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h

On 30/11/2007, B.J. McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a > Phishing scam. Have identified subject virus amongst other things. It > appears twice in a virus scan; /sbin/z (which I assume can just be deleted) > and /sys/bus/serio/

[CentOS] CleanLog.h

Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a Phishing scam. Have identified subject virus amongst other things. It appears twice in a virus scan; /sbin/z (which I assume can just be deleted) and /sys/bus/serio/drivers/atkbd/description. The latter file is also present in ide

[CentOS] Re: Centos 5.1 distro: How to upgrade 5.0 to 5.1 with yum??

on 11/29/2007 2:20 PM Robinson Tiemuqinke spake the following: --- Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John R Pierce wrote: afaik, the updates directory contains the latest updates to all packages that have been updated since the original .0 release. Thats not true, the /updates/ dir

Re: [CentOS] special tricks for developers box on centos 5

On Nov 29, 2007 10:36 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do > that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont > about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2 > 4800+ with 2GIG ram. # mak

Re: [CentOS] special tricks for developers box on centos 5

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:36:39 -0500 Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do > that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont > about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2 > 4800+ with 2GIG

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

On Thu, Nov 29, 2007, Steve Searle wrote: >Around 04:48pm on Thursday, November 29, 2007 (UK time), Tronn Wærdahl >scrawled: > >> British and English is the same ain't it .. > >No, England is one of the countries in Britain. English, Scots and >Welsh are all British. And all speak di

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 distro: How to upgrade 5.0 to 5.1 with yum??

--- Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: > > afaik, the updates directory contains the latest > updates to all packages > > that have been updated since the original .0 > release. > > Thats not true, the /updates/ dir will only > contain updates > released from the

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

Around 04:48pm on Thursday, November 29, 2007 (UK time), Tronn Wærdahl scrawled: > British and English is the same ain't it .. No, England is one of the countries in Britain. English, Scots and Welsh are all British. Steve -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people nor

Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic - where to go from here?

On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:27 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Nov 28, 2007 11:27 AM, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I googled "unable to handle kernel paging request" and didn't really find > > anything useful (to me). > > In my experience this probably means that you have some RAM going bad

[CentOS] special tricks for developers box on centos 5

I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2 4800+ with 2GIG ram. Just curious if I can reduce any more time out of my compiles. Jerry ___

Re: [CentOS] SNMP Log entries

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enyo wrote: > I do not care about seeing normal connection info from snmpd, but > retaining logging for other info such as malformed packets, bad > community strings etc is of interest. I think you can just put your logging level in /etc/snmp/snmpd.c

Re: [CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

Scott Silva wrote: It won't hurt to re-install. The tricky part is knowing where the 2nd drive in the set will appear when the first fails so you can do the configuration correctly. This isn't as tricky as you think. It just takes some thought. Yes, but you need to think from the bios per

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

On Nov 29, 2007 7:33 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tronn Wærdahl wrote: > > > > What do you call a person that only speak one language ? :-) > > > > I'd call him normal, but what's the punch line? > > -- > Les Mikesell >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __

[CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

on 11/29/2007 7:53 AM Les Mikesell spake the following: Christopher Chan wrote: Is there a way to know where grub is installed? I have a few servers running in RAID 1 software for /boot, I gotta fix this. If I can't tell whether it is installed or not, is it dangerous to re-install it using

[CentOS] SNMP Log entries

Hi, Does anyone know how to prevent snmpd from writing the below into /var/log/messages/ Nov 29 19:35:02 serenity snmpd[2287]: Received SNMP packet(s) from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:34309 Nov 29 19:35:02 serenity snmpd[2287]: Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:34309 Nov 29 19:35:02 serenity last message rep

Re: [CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

--- Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: > > Ugo Bellavance wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have a Dell poweredge 400SC here with an > LSI scsi card. > >> > >> I installed Centos4 a while ago and put it in a > datacenter. I > >> rebooted many weeks after, and the

[CentOS] Re: RAID, LVM, extra disks...

Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Ugo Bellavance wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: What are you trying to accomplish storage wise? Is this for commerical or personal use? Commercial, but non-critical use. If for personal use, then it isn't as critical how it is setup, but if this is for commercial us

RE: [CentOS] Re: RAID, LVM, extra disks...

Ugo Bellavance wrote: > > Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > > What are you trying to accomplish storage wise? > > > > Is this for commerical or personal use? > > Commercial, but non-critical use. > > > If for personal use, then it isn't as critical how it is > setup, but if > > this is for comm

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

Tronn Wærdahl wrote: What do you call a person that only speak one language ? :-) I'd call him normal, but what's the punch line? -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list

[CentOS] 32-bit xen pv domU on 64-bit dom0?

Hello, I'm hitting a problem with heartbeat which might be related to the use of x86_64. My test system is CentOS 5 Xen DomU x86_64 under CentOS 5 Dom0. Can I run i386 CentOS 5 DomU under x86_64 Dom0? Thanks, --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cen

[CentOS] Re: RAID, LVM, extra disks...

Ross S. W. Walker wrote: What are you trying to accomplish storage wise? Is this for commerical or personal use? Commercial, but non-critical use. If for personal use, then it isn't as critical how it is setup, but if this is for commercial use then you need to target your storage to your a

[CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

on 11/29/2007 7:56 AM Tronn Wærdahl spake the following: On Nov 29, 2007 2:50 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Tronn W�rdahl wrote: > On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 PM, Jun Salen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] Sharing Partitions between Linux and Windows

On Nov 29, 2007 9:23 AM, Saurabh Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All > > I've just shifteed over to linux,form Windows.I 'm having 5 partations > for use by my windows XP Professional and another one by linux.The > partation table is as shown : > ---

[CentOS] Re: Help with file descriptors

on 11/29/2007 2:44 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: Was this thread hijacked, or is Thunderbird being stupid again? Yes. Well, don't know about the last thing, I don't use Thunderbird :) Cheers, Ralph I meant my thunderbird being stupid. Sometimes it thinks threadi

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir

On Thu, Nov 29, 2007, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: >On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:51:25AM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote: >> We haven't had any notable performance problems using this at a regional >> ISP customer's site with about 10,000 e-mail users and several machines in >> a cluster delivering mail to Mail

[CentOS] Sharing Partitions between Linux and Windows

Hi All I've just shifteed over to linux,form Windows.I 'm having 5 partations for use by my windows XP Professional and another one by linux.The partation table is as shown : --

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 distro: How to upgrade 5.0 to 5.1 with yum??

John R Pierce wrote: afaik, the updates directory contains the latest updates to all packages that have been updated since the original .0 release. Thats not true, the /updates/ dir will only contain updates released from the time that the /os/ was released. However, that is not an issue sinc

RE: [CentOS] Re: RAID, LVM, extra disks...

Ugo Bellavance wrote: > > Alain Spineux wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2007 4:21 PM, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Alain Spineux wrote: > >>> On Nov 29, 2007 6:59 AM, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is my current config: > > /dev/md

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:51:25AM -0800, Bill Campbell wrote: > We haven't had any notable performance problems using this at a regional > ISP customer's site with about 10,000 e-mail users and several machines in > a cluster delivering mail to Maildi

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

Tronn Wærdahl wrote: On Nov 29, 2007 5:04 PM, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > What do you call a person that only speak one language ? :-) > British ? ___ CentOS mailing list Cent

Re: [CentOS] 32bit HVM within CentOS5 x86_64+xen3?

- "Nils Toedtmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > I have to install a xen virtualization host that will start with 4GB > RAM and will maybe grow to 8GB in the future. And there has to be a 32bit > winXP domU. Is CentOS5(.1) x86_64 able to run 32bit HVMs or do i have > to stick with i386/PAE

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

> > > > english? British and English is the same ain't it .. -- "The box said: Requires MS Windows or better, so I installed Linux" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

No, but your close :-) english? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

On Nov 29, 2007 5:04 PM, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > What do you call a person that only speak one language ? :-) > > > > British ? > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

RE: [CentOS] Re: RAID, LVM, extra disks...

Ugo Bellavance wrote: > > Alain Spineux wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2007 6:59 AM, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> This is my current config: > >> > >> /dev/md0 -> 200 MB -> sda1 + sdd1 -> /boot > >> /dev/md1 -> 36 GB -> sda2 + sdd2 -> form VolGroup00 with md2 > >> /

[CentOS] Re: RAID, LVM, extra disks...

Alain Spineux wrote: On Nov 29, 2007 4:21 PM, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alain Spineux wrote: On Nov 29, 2007 6:59 AM, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, This is my current config: /dev/md0 -> 200 MB -> sda1 + sdd1 -> /boot /dev/md1 -> 36 GB -> sda2 + sdd2

Re: [CentOS] Deleting files from dump?

--On Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:50 AM -0500 Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it possible to delete a file from dump? I saved it in one dump archive, and want to save space by deleting it from the others. You'd need to write a new dump file, as it models a physical tape, and r

Re: [CentOS] Re: RAID, LVM, extra disks...

On Nov 29, 2007 4:21 PM, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alain Spineux wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2007 6:59 AM, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> This is my current config: > >> > >> /dev/md0 -> 200 MB -> sda1 + sdd1 -> /boot > >> /dev/md1 -> 36 GB -> sda2

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

What do you call a person that only speak one language ? :-) British ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

On Nov 29, 2007 2:50 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tronn Wærdahl wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 PM, Jun Salen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Have a look at http://zimbra.com. It has an open-source version with > >> unlimited users. I've tried both it and scalix and much pref

Re: [CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

Christopher Chan wrote: Is there a way to know where grub is installed? I have a few servers running in RAID 1 software for /boot, I gotta fix this. If I can't tell whether it is installed or not, is it dangerous to re-install it using the command above? It won't hurt to re-install. The t

[CentOS] Re: RAID, LVM, extra disks...

Alain Spineux wrote: On Nov 29, 2007 6:59 AM, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, This is my current config: /dev/md0 -> 200 MB -> sda1 + sdd1 -> /boot /dev/md1 -> 36 GB -> sda2 + sdd2 -> form VolGroup00 with md2 /dev/md2 -> 18 GB -> sdb1 + sde1 -> form VolGroup00 with md1

[CentOS] Re: lvresize --resizefs

Matt Hyclak wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:37:46PM -0500, Ugo Bellavance enlightened us: There is a difference between the help of lvresize and its man page. In the manpage, there is nothing about the -r or --resizefs function. Centos4. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# lvresize Please specify eith

[CentOS] 32bit HVM within CentOS5 x86_64+xen3?

Hi *! I have to install a xen virtualization host that will start with 4GB RAM and will maybe grow to 8GB in the future. And there has to be a 32bit winXP domU. Is CentOS5(.1) x86_64 able to run 32bit HVMs or do i have to stick with i386/PAE? /nils. __

[CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

Christopher Chan wrote: Ugo Bellavance wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher Chan pisze: grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a mirrored partition? Yes What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot? That is weird. I just re-installed c

[CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

Christopher Chan wrote: Ugo Bellavance wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher Chan pisze: grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a mirrored partition? Yes What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot? That is weird. I just re-installed c

Re: [CentOS] Announcing the CentOS on Laptops initiative

"Bart Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 28, 2007 7:23 AM, David G. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now everything (sort of) "just works (TM)". I say "sort > of" because I'm still running ndiswrapper since every time I've tried > the bcm43xx kernel module it hasn't worked with my

Re: [CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

Ugo Bellavance wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher Chan pisze: grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a mirrored partition? Yes What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot? That is weird. I just re-installed centos5 and it is now booti

Re: [CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

Ugo Bellavance wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher Chan pisze: grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a mirrored partition? Yes What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot? That is weird. I just re-installed centos5 and it is now booti

Re: [CentOS] RAID, LVM, extra disks...

On Nov 29, 2007 6:59 AM, Ugo Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is my current config: > > /dev/md0 -> 200 MB -> sda1 + sdd1 -> /boot > /dev/md1 -> 36 GB -> sda2 + sdd2 -> form VolGroup00 with md2 > /dev/md2 -> 18 GB -> sdb1 + sde1 -> form VolGroup00 with md1 > > sda,sdd

Re: [CentOS] lvresize --resizefs

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:37:46PM -0500, Ugo Bellavance enlightened us: > There is a difference between the help of lvresize and its man page. > In the manpage, there is nothing about the -r or --resizefs function. > Centos4. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# lvresize > Please specify either si

[CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher Chan pisze: grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a mirrored partition? Yes What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot? That is weird. I just re-installed centos5 and it is now booting properly. What cou

[CentOS] Re: Stuck at GRUB

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher Chan pisze: grub cannot find its second stage. Are you booting from a mirrored partition? Yes What could be a solution? And what could have happen upon the reboot? That is weird. I just re-installed centos5 and it is now booting properly. What cou

Re: [CentOS] reasons for using CentOS in business environments

On Nov 28, 2007 8:25 AM, Barry Brimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a simple rule that determines is I use RHEL or CentOS in > my work environment. Does the software running on this machine > require RHEL in order to have vendor support. An extension of that > rule is whether nor not Red

Re: [CentOS] cisco vpn client on linux

On Nov 28, 2007 12:45 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a cisco vpn client for linux centso 5 AMD 64 bit? > vpnclient-linux-x86_64-4.8.01.0640-k9.tar.gz That's the latest 64-bit version of the Cisco VPN client. But you need to download from Cisco via CCO account or perhaps yo

[CentOS] Deleting files from dump?

Is it possible to delete a file from dump? I saved it in one dump archive, and want to save space by deleting it from the others. Thanks. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

Tronn Wærdahl wrote: On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 PM, Jun Salen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Have a look at http://zimbra.com. It has an open-source version with unlimited users. I've tried both it and scalix and much prefer zimbra. Why don't you try Open-xchange, I put together a CD based on CentO

Re: [CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 PM, Jun Salen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have a look at http://zimbra.com. It has an open-source version with > unlimited users. I've tried both it and scalix and much prefer zimbra. > > Cheers. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by M

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 33, Issue 14

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

[CentOS] Re: Mail Server Install

Have a look at http://zimbra.com. It has an open-source version with unlimited users. I've tried both it and scalix and much prefer zimbra. Cheers. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. [Fred Kienker] Scalix has ann

[CentOS] heartbeat segfaulting on CentOS 5 x86_64 (xen guest)

Hello, I'm having trouble running two linux-ha heartbeat nodes and have them talk to each other (or actually one of the nodes just doesn't work even for local basic admin stuff, including a simple "service heartbeat stop") and apparently it all boils down to the following Bug in Linux-HA: http://d

Re: [CentOS] Re: Help with file descriptors

Scott Silva wrote: > Was this thread hijacked, or is Thunderbird being stupid again? Yes. Well, don't know about the last thing, I don't use Thunderbird :) Cheers, Ralph pgpFdXBKKS1rQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cen

RE: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 distro: How to upgrade 5.0 to 5.1 with yum??

Robinson Tiemuqinke wrote: > --- Jancio Wodnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Robinson Tiemuqinke pisze: >>> >>> Currently I download the Centos 5.0 upgrade packages from mirror >>> sites on Internet (.../centos/5/updates/{SRPMS,i386,x86_64}/...), >>> with the arrival of Centos 5.1, are the exi

Re: [CentOS] reasons for using CentOS in business environments

Rogelio wrote: > My apologies if this question has been previously answered, but could > anyone here provide me with resources that I might use to help build a > case for exclusively using CentOS in an enterprise environment? > (Approximately 200 servers) [...] > Reasons thus far I've come up wit

Re: [CentOS] OT: virtual server hosting recomendation

Karanbir Singh napsal(a): > how about start looking from here : http://www.centos.org/mirrors in the > sponsors section. They are the people who suppose CentOS by donating b/w > and servers I'm gonna use the list. Word of mouth is just word of mouth :o). D.