Hi Folks,
I'm using ISDN-Connections extensively because ADSL is not available.
So far it works fine "out of the box" (CentOS 5 PAE).
Two questions:
1. for which the fcpci-kernel-modules from atrpm-Repo are useful?
2. Whats about channel bundling?
Does CentOS bundling automaticly on every est
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what gave me this idea, but I decided
to comment out the swap partition in /etc/fstab
and reboot my laptop. I did not run swapoff directly at
any time.
I'm running more things now than I would ever dream of
to hammer my 500MB of memory, but I still notice NO
I'm not sure what gave me this idea, but I decided
to comment out the swap partition in /etc/fstab
and reboot my laptop. I did not run swapoff directly at
any time.
I'm running more things now than I would ever dream of
to hammer my 500MB of memory, but I still notice NO
slowdown. This is the best
Currently I'm using an NV34(Geforce FX 5500). It's a PCI card, and it
has both SVGA and DVI outputs. I don't know if both outputs will work at
once, but I don't see why not. The card is working fine for me. Sorry,
but I don't have a second one to sell, but that should give you a
starting point.
>That leads to the question, where is the partition for the
/boot for the Centos5 kernels located and is there LBA support in the BIOS?
should have been: where is the partition for the /boot filesystem that
holds the centos5 kernels located...
___
C
Garrick Staples wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:12:33PM -0600, John Thompson alleged:
On 2007-11-07, Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any clues what I did wrong?
Yes. You placed the kernel on an LVM (grub does not support LVM...at
least not LVM2 IIRC) and then come to this list
mbneto wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a cheap PCI (or AGP) video card with dual output (DVI
or VGA) and CentOS support.
nvidia x200yy for x=6,7 and yy=GS or whatever is cheapest.
probably will have one each VGA + DVI, usable concurrently. will easily
support 2 x 1600 x 1200 x 32bit at high
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:12:33PM -0600, John Thompson alleged:
> On 2007-11-07, Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Any clues what I did wrong?
> >>
> >
> > Yes. You placed the kernel on an LVM (grub does not support LVM...at
> > least not LVM2 IIRC) and then come to this list w
On 2007-11-07, Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Any clues what I did wrong?
>>
>
> Yes. You placed the kernel on an LVM (grub does not support LVM...at
> least not LVM2 IIRC) and then come to this list where grub and lilo
> users like me are subscribers. Don't complain about grub.
Paul Norton wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Paul Norton wrote:
>
Postfix is dying on one of my servers almost nightly. This system is
running CentOS5 with postfix-2.3.3-2.
In the morning (after noticing it died) I try to run `service postfix
stop` and I get a failed start. Running `ps ax
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Andrew Allen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:06 -0800, James A. Peltier wrote:
> > Andrew Allen wrote:
> > > Having just upgraded my system from CentOS 4.4 to 5.0, I'm a bit
> > > disappointed that I still can't install skype from the skype repo using
> > > yum - when I try y
mbneto wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a cheap PCI (or AGP) video card with dual output (DVI
or VGA) and CentOS support.
Any recommendations? I am not interested in games.
Thanks.
___
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, mbneto wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a cheap PCI (or AGP) video card with dual output (DVI or
VGA) and CentOS support.
Any recommendations? I am not interested in games.
Thanks.
Not sure what you consider cheap, but I've had great success with the
NVidia Quadro FX 3450/
Hi,
I am looking for a cheap PCI (or AGP) video card with dual output (DVI or
VGA) and CentOS support.
Any recommendations? I am not interested in games.
Thanks.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
As it turns out, I did this for 4.2, instead of 4.5...but here are my
notes from when I did it:
(It is geared toward IBM of course, but the steps would be the same..)
Grab driver disk (.iso)from:
http://www-304.ibm.com/jct01004c/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisp
lay?lndocid=MIGR-5070766&b
Andrew Allen wrote:
Thanks,
Actually Ekiga is already installed in my CentOS 5 system - one question
though - can I communicate with skype users via Ekiga?
Andy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 10:51 -0800, Mark Pryor wrote:
> Keith,
> --- Keith Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What is the mechanism or procedure for installing
> > additional packages from the six CentOS 5.0 CD's
> > using Yum, assuming a secured server with no outside
> > internet connecti
Hello to everyone
I had a little trouble with my new laptop, I have a Packard Bell MZ380
laptop with Realtek High Definition Audio, I have installed CentOS 5 on
it, I have sound by the speaker but when I plug the headphone the sound
is over, I mean I have not sound by the speaker and by the headpho
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:06 -0800, James A. Peltier wrote:
> Andrew Allen wrote:
> > Having just upgraded my system from CentOS 4.4 to 5.0, I'm a bit
> > disappointed that I still can't install skype from the skype repo using
> > yum - when I try yum install skype, I end up with:
> >
> > libsigc++
Marty Landman wrote:
I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running
CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup
device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of
system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know
what so
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:13:38PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] enlightened us:
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:38:11 -0800
> "James A. Peltier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This was more a question of whether the CentOS 5.0 build would
> > just be skipped in place of a 5.1 build since there has not yet
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:38:11 -0800
"James A. Peltier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was more a question of whether the CentOS 5.0 build would
> just be skipped in place of a 5.1 build since there has not yet
> been a CentOS 5.0 build for IA64 released yet. So with that
> said "All Arch releas
Paul Heinlein wrote:
It'd be something to the effect of
semanage fcontext -a -t textrel_shlib_t \
"/usr/lib/oracle/11.1.0.1/client/lib/.*\.so.*"
or, less version-specific,
semanage fcontext -a -t textrel_shlib_t \
"/usr/lib/oracle/[0-9.]*/client/lib/.*\.so.*"
Double-plus good!
On Nov 8, 2007 12:32 PM, Thom Paine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you able to install via NFS from a laptop or anything?
Thanks, Thom, is, I'll try it. It didn't even cross my mind since
I've always been able to use a CD in YG/RH/FC/F installation.
I'll report back soon.
-Tom
Tom Browder
Ni
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Jay Leafey wrote:
I downloaded the RPMs from the Oracle web site (otn.oracle.com) and
successfully installed them on my C5 box, but the sqlplus client
software would not run properly. After a few iterations with
sealert, I finally got a handle on what was happening.
It t
I downloaded the RPMs from the Oracle web site (otn.oracle.com) and
successfully installed them on my C5 box, but the sqlplus client
software would not run properly. After a few iterations with sealert, I
finally got a handle on what was happening.
It turns out that most of the shared librari
James A. Peltier wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I am not sure what you mean by CentOS-5 IA64 port being 5.1 ??? All
Arch releases follow the same update / rebuild cycle.
This was more a question of whether the CentOS 5.0 build would just be
skipped in place of a 5.
Are you able to install via NFS from a laptop or anything?
On Nov 8, 2007 1:04 PM, Tom Browder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get to where the installation begins copying packages to the new
> host and it's time to change CD's to the second one. I get the
> following message:
>
> An error occur
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 04:47 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> David Hrbác wrote:
> > Michael Rock napsal(a):
> >>
> >
> > I'd like to point that I'm trying my best and it takes long time, even
> > that I have dual xeon and dual opteron machines. I have to build about
> > 12 kernel RPMS, prepare DVD c
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Mark Snyder wrote:
Tom Brown wrote:
Reply was meant for Tom Brown's message, not Mark Snyder's . . . .
--
Toby Bluhm
Midwest Instruments Inc.
30825 Aurora Road Suite 100
Solon Ohio 44139
440-424-2240
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
I get to where the installation begins copying packages to the new
host and it's time to change CD's to the second one. I get the
following message:
An error occurred unmounting the CD...
make sure you're not accessing /mnt/source
from the shell on tty2...click Ok to retry.
I click and no
Marty Landman wrote:
> I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running
> CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup
> device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of
> system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know
> wh
Mark Snyder wrote:
Tom Brown wrote:
I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running
CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup
device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of
system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 06:40:16 -0500
fred smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doubt it. Office closed at night. I've got (luckily) my own office.
> I'm often the first person there, but it'a always like this.
Minor earthquake? Street sweeper, perhaps?
You could eliminate this as the cause by unplu
On Nov 8, 2007 10:28 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >> Does this also mean that the CentOS 5 IA64 port will now be CentOS 5.1
> >> IA64 instead?
>
> I am not sure what you mean by CentOS-5 IA64 port being 5.1 ??? All Arch
> releases follow the same upd
> Any recommendations would be appreciated.
I use backuppc for all my backups. I never got the archiving
fucntionality to work, so I take lvm snapshots of the backup directory
and put them on tape.
Patrick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:
I'm trying to get the Syspro/Encore MRP software running on a new CentOS 5
x86_64 system which uses an ODBC package built with old glibc/errno
libraries.
I have this same software running on a Suse Linux Enterprise 9 SP3 system
using LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1, but when I try this on CentOS 5 it resul
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I am not sure what you mean by CentOS-5 IA64 port being 5.1 ??? All Arch
releases follow the same update / rebuild cycle.
This was more a question of whether the CentOS 5.0 build would just be
skipped in place of a 5.1 build since there has n
Christopher Chan wrote:
Paul Norton wrote:
>
Postfix is dying on one of my servers almost nightly. This system is
running CentOS5 with postfix-2.3.3-2.
In the morning (after noticing it died) I try to run `service postfix
stop` and I get a failed start. Running `ps ax | grep postfix` I can
Tom Brown wrote:
I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running
CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup
device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of
system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know
what so
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Does this also mean that the CentOS 5 IA64 port will now be CentOS 5.1
IA64 instead?
I am not sure what you mean by CentOS-5 IA64 port being 5.1 ??? All Arch
releases follow the same update / rebuild cycle.
Anyway, once we get the release out - the updates on IA64
On Nov 8, 2007 9:10 AM, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > On Nov 8, 2007 1:12 AM, Rainer Traut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> now that EL5.1 is out the big question is when will Centos 5.1 be out.
> >> I know the answer, when it's ready.
> >
>
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Marty Landman wrote:
I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running
CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup
device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of
system backups weekly and differential backups nightly bu
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 19:41 +0200, Alain Spineux wrote:
> On 10/24/07, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I am playing with virtualization on centos 5.
> > I have an old redhat 7 system I still need so I want to virtualize it.
> > I found the old disk, installed in the virtual env
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007 1:12 AM, Rainer Traut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
now that EL5.1 is out the big question is when will Centos 5.1 be out.
I know the answer, when it's ready.
According to KB, the target is "in a couple of weeks". By the way,
there are answers to that qu
Bacula is probably the most advanced backup tools: multi-server,
multi-back-device...
Run on windows, linux and under GPL.
Packages available for mainstream distribution.
Not easy to use nor configure, but arkeia, arcserver ... are no easy too !
On Nov 8, 2007 3:54 PM, Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTE
I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running
CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup
device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of
system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know
what software to recommend
I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running
CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup
device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of
system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know
what software to recommend fo
On 06 November 2007 , John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>indeed. in some filename/directory standard or another who's name
>escapes me, /opt is the standard place to install non-core distribution
>software packages ... linux people often use /usr/local for this, but
>/usr/local is intend
On 06 November 2007, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Use something else for that, not /opt. Just make up some directory name,
>unmount /opt, re-mount the FAT32 partition under the new directory, and
>then leave /opt alone.
I will do that! I made that mistake about 2 1/2 years ago, but
On Nov 8, 2007 3:08 AM, Sebastian Marten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Is it Possible to create this fix for CentOS too?
>
> Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243753
>
> Solution: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0676.html
Yes. This should be rolled out as part of the
On Nov 8, 2007 12:48 PM, Simon Jolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Centos Users
>
> # ping 10.104.89.146
> connect: Invalid argument
Did you try to ssh yourself, ping something else in your network and
outside of your network ?
What about ifconfig, route -n ?
Did you enable IPV6 ?
What is your la
Simon Jolle wrote:
> Hi Centos Users
>
> # ping 10.104.89.146
> connect: Invalid argument
Do you get this with all kinds of arguments to ping,
or is it just if you ping your own IP?
# ping 130.226.184.9
# ping ftp.crc.dk
# ping localhost
# ping 127.0.0.1
Does the machine have more than one NIC?
allations by running the command:
yum update cups\*
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type:
Hi Centos Users
# ping 10.104.89.146
connect: Invalid argument
The Server has normal network connectivity. I ssh into it over this
interface. Strace output on Pastebin [0]. SELinux is disabled. Centos
4.3
cheers
Simon
[0] http://pastebin.com/m720052a8
--
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:04:14AM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:12:32 -0500
> fred smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anyone got any idea how I can figure this one out?
>
> Is it possible that external factors are causing this? For example, the chap
> going past your desk
>
I am using this on my CentOS 4 machine. I would expect it to work on
a CentOS 5 machine as well.
Add the following to /etc/sysctl.conf
net.core.rmem_default = 67108864
net.core.wmem_default = 67108864
net.core.rmem_max = 67108864
net.core.wmem_max = 67108864
net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 4096 67108864
Hi all!
We have just released new updates for the yum channel of the open-sharedroot
software for CentOS4 and CentOS5.
With the open-sharedroot software package, you can build up a NFS or GFS based
diskless sharedroot cluster with CentOS4 and CentOS5. It also contains a
toolset to clone or back
On Nov 8, 2007 1:12 AM, Rainer Traut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> now that EL5.1 is out the big question is when will Centos 5.1 be out.
> I know the answer, when it's ready.
According to KB, the target is "in a couple of weeks". By the way,
there are answers to that question other th
Hi all,
now that EL5.1 is out the big question is when will Centos 5.1 be out.
I know the answer, when it's ready.
But how is status of the problems described here?
http://www.karan.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/29/so_when_is_5_1_due
Thx
Rainer
___
Cent
Hello,
Is it Possible to create this fix for CentOS too?
Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243753
Solution: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0676.html
regards
Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Ce
61 matches
Mail list logo
