On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:30:06 -0700
"James A. Peltier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to install Gnumeric using the kbsingh RPMs. Has anyone been
> able to use these with CentOS 5?
I just downloaded the FC6 src.rpm and compiled it on Centos 5. It works fine.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Mel
I'm trying to install Gnumeric using the kbsingh RPMs. Has anyone been
able to use these with CentOS 5?
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
kbs-Extras-i386 100% |=| 951 B00:00
kbs-Misc-i386 100% |===
try :
# /usr/sbin/alternatives --display print
print - status is auto.
link currently points to /usr/bin/lpr.cups
/usr/bin/lpr.cups - priority 40
slave print-lp: /usr/bin/lp.cups
slave print-lpq: /usr/bin/lpq.cups
slave print-lprm: /usr/bin/lprm.cups
slave print-lpstat: /usr/bin/lpstat.cups
Look in your fedora fc1 or knoppix witch module was loaded for your two nic.
Then try a
# modprobe
then
# dmesg
to look if both nics where recognized.
If so you have to update your modprobe.conf
Alain
Regards
On 10/22/07, Linux Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm building a Linux box to act
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
I would really rather make qmail newbies go through the flames and
really learn how qmail works than let them loose with a list of
instr
Christopher Chan wrote:
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
I would really rather make qmail newbies go through the flames and
really learn how qmail works than let them loose with a list of
instructions.
Just tell t
Mário Gamito wrote:
Hi all,
I'm building this site about email servers - http://www.qmailrules.com
It intends to be the *most extensive and comprehensive* site about qmail.
LWQ seems to be doing quite adequately.
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
gettin
Karanbir Singh wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
qmail.org site.
or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
and lets not forget the one true MTA to rule them all : Exim!
Where do we join th
Does anyone know where I can find good ol' fashion gv? It seems the
only ghostview is kghostview or evince.
--
James A. Peltier
Technical Director, RHCE
SCIRF | GrUVi @ Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone : 778-782-3610
Fax : 778-782-3045
Mobile : 778-840-6434
E-Mail : [EMAIL
Michael Rock wrote:
> So the update is not on any mirror or anywhere else
> besides Dave's site on DVD?
>
> In otherwords to fix this there is no choice but to
> reinstall from DVD or CD through his ISO?
>
David does great work, but CentOS is about being a clone of tested
enterprise software.
W
John R Pierce wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
>> qmail.org site.
>>
>
> or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
and lets not forget the one true MTA to rule them all : Exim!
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.ka
I am forwarding this exchange from the BIND 9 list (I posted the question)
because it seems relevant. any comment on this? Is it for the North
American Linux Distributor to fix, or is it something the CentOS folks can
do?
> When my 64-bit Centos5 machine boots up, I see the following messages:
> p
>> Squid actually Proxy will do the trick
>
> Nope. Not if they are installed on those PCs.
>
>
> Just block outgoing connections to all webservers but those that are
> allowed.
>
> iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -d allowedip -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -d centosm
No, it doesn't use that.
The "unusual" things that I use is Nat (S and D), and mark to support TC.
2007/10/22, Barry Brimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Linux Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I'm building a Linux box to act as Proxy/Router/Firewall.
> > I'm using CentOS 4.5, with an "old" motherbo
Quoting Linux Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm building a Linux box to act as Proxy/Router/Firewall.
> I'm using CentOS 4.5, with an "old" motherboard (Asus A8V-X), and two
> Ethernet NIC, based on a realtek chip, that's widely supported under
> 2.4 and later kernel (the cards were functioning excel
So the update is not on any mirror or anywhere else
besides Dave's site on DVD?
In otherwords to fix this there is no choice but to
reinstall from DVD or CD through his ISO?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
I'm building a Linux box to act as Proxy/Router/Firewall.
I'm using CentOS 4.5, with an "old" motherboard (Asus A8V-X), and two
Ethernet NIC, based on a realtek chip, that's widely supported under
2.4 and later kernel (the cards were functioning excellent in another
PC whit Fedora Core 1).
CentOS d
Remove the max_bonds=2 from /etc/modprobe.conf
Yup, doing that removed the mystery "bond1" under /proc/net/bonding -
thanks!
best,
Jeff
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello
I have dell servers and just want to install its MIBs so I can monitor
them through snmpwalk.
is copying MIBs to /usr/share/snmp/mibs enough ?
all MIBS in /usr/share/snmp/mibs has .txt extensions.
should change the extension as well ?
Thanks
_
Scott Silva wrote on Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:10:58 -0700:
> If your swap is on LVM, and LVM is on a raid 1 array, then effectively your
> swap is on raid, so no worries.
Yeah, it just works fine.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive
Scott Silva wrote:
CentOS does not have any control to insert any links into the
qmail.org site.
or even come with qmail. CentOS includes sendmail and postfix.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
on 10/22/2007 12:09 PM Mário Gamito spake the following:
Hi all,
I'm building this site about email servers - http://www.qmailrules.com
It intends to be the *most extensive and comprehensive* site about qmail.
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Phil Schaffner wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 13:13 -0400, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I tried to boot from two different CentOS 5 DVDs, both pass the checksum
test, and both give me the same error on a Dell laptop from either GUI or
text install modes:
invalid compressed format (e
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 13:13 -0400, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I tried to boot from two different CentOS 5 DVDs, both pass the checksum
> test, and both give me the same error on a Dell laptop from either GUI or
> text install modes:
>
> invalid compressed format (err=2)
> VFS: Cannot open root devic
Hi all,
I'm building this site about email servers - http://www.qmailrules.com
It intends to be the *most extensive and comprehensive* site about qmail.
It is like a step-by-step book, that intendes to *really* help people
getting their servers up and running.
It is not yet complete, but will
> > Actually, I've just tried that and the launcher's now on my desktop - but
> > how do I launch skype? When I (right) click on it nothing happens or try to
> > launch from the command line, I get these errors:
> >
> > skype: error while loading shared libraries: libsigc-2.0.so.0: cannot open
on 10/22/2007 11:35 AM Michael Rock spake the following:
You might want to check out these threads:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=9585&forum=39
and
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=9667&forum=39
Akemi
I do
> I can not make a "Redistributable" RPM, as Skype is not GPL ... so
> please don't ask :D
But a SPEC file could be distributed so other people can create their
own RPMs from the static tarball :-)
--
rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
on 10/22/2007 11:28 AM Rogelio spake the following:
Something happened over the weekend power-related on my VMware test
server, and when I came back and restarted my VMware server box
(running CentOS), I got the following message:
"VMware Server is installed, but it has not been (correctly) conf
> You might want to check out these threads:
>
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=9585&forum=39
> and
>
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=9667&forum=39
>
> Akemi
I do see the DVD image on David Hrbáè's website which
I be
> Is this someting VMware related? CentOS 4 related? Or possibly some
> misconfiguration on my part? This box has been working fine for months
> (and has been rebooted many times), so I'm not sure what "changed"
> (certainly nothing on the host OS level).
VMWare does this whenever you get a new
Something happened over the weekend power-related on my VMware test
server, and when I came back and restarted my VMware server box
(running CentOS), I got the following message:
"VMware Server is installed, but it has not been (correctly) configured
for the running kernel. To (re-)configure it, i
Andrew Allen wrote:
>> While I do not normally recommend using statically compiled binaries or
>> installing programs that are not RPMS, in this case there is no real
>> choice, other than breaking your system by upgrading qt ... which I
>> would never recommend.
>>
>> I can not make a "Redistribut
On 10/22/07, Michael Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of
> problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does
> anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has
> support for these chipsets be available on any on a
> Centos mirror?
>
> Has
I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of
problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does
anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has
support for these chipsets be available on any on a
Centos mirror?
Has the support for these chipsets been added to yum
yet?
Here are
> While I do not normally recommend using statically compiled binaries or
> installing programs that are not RPMS, in this case there is no real
> choice, other than breaking your system by upgrading qt ... which I
> would never recommend.
>
> I can not make a "Redistributable" RPM, as Skype is no
Florin Andrei wrote:
Apply this patch to the scripts/package/mkspec file (careful, at least
one line is wrapped by the Gmane mail archive, so unwrap manually):
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/593172
Or just use the patch file attached to this message if the mail archive
doesn't w
Florin Andrei wrote:
Let's say I want to use a much newer kernel - even one from the future,
such as the upcoming 2.6.24. :-) What would y'all smart folks do in this
case, in order to avoid any possible nasty consequences?
Would you import the config file from the original CentOS5 kernel into
t
J. Potter wrote:
>
> >> So... how does one remove bond1?
> >
> > Shouldn't this do the trick?
> > rm /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond1
>
> One would hope... but that file doesn't exist. In fact, there is no
> file under /etc that contains the letters "bond1", nor any file
> under /et
I tried to boot from two different CentOS 5 DVDs, both pass the checksum
test, and both give me the same error on a Dell laptop from either GUI or
text install modes:
invalid compressed format (err=2)
VFS: Cannot open root device "" or unknown-block(253,0)
Please append a correct "root=" boot o
on 10/22/2007 7:32 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:05:09 -0700:
As long as the partitions were raid-autostart (fd I believe) it should pick it
up.
Yeah, it wasn't a problem at all.
Having a CDrom on a channel shouldn't be a problem as long as th
So... how does one remove bond1?
Shouldn't this do the trick?
rm /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond1
One would hope... but that file doesn't exist. In fact, there is no
file under /etc that contains the letters "bond1", nor any file
under /etc that contains the contents "bond1".
Hello All.
Anyone know what the cause of this error is in Centos 4?
$ system-config-printer
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/system-config-printer", line 9, in ?
import queueTree
File "/usr/share/printconf/util/queueTree.py", line 1236, in ?
queueTree()
File "/usr/s
Jan Falkenhagen wrote:
>> Right ... that one connection is the "X0 (local)" connection, that is
>> your "normal local desktop" shared.
> is there any way to get rid of this session? it keeps confusing my
> colleagues, so it would be very nice if it could be convinced to
> disappear.
>
You can tur
> Right ... that one connection is the "X0 (local)" connection, that is
> your "normal local desktop" shared.
is there any way to get rid of this session? it keeps confusing my
colleagues, so it would be very nice if it could be convinced to
disappear.
best regards
jan
___
On 22/10/2007, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> great thanks - On Dell they call it Open Manage so do you mind telling
> me the name that HP use for their tools please? Or even a download link ??
HP SIM.
--
Alvin Chang Yu-Ming
___
CentOS mailing l
Hi,
Thanks for help.
I was able to install srvadmin-base on my server, and added following
lines on snmp.conf
rwcommunity
view all included .1
smuxpeer .1.3.6.1.4.1.674.10892.1
But still can not browse Dell OID with following command.
snmpwalk -Of -v 1 -c public 127.0.0.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.674
>Message: 6
>On 21 October 2007, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That file does not change often from the default ... you can get the
>default version by downloading the RPM in question and using this
>command in the directory where you put it:
>rpm2cpio yum-priorities-1.0.4-2.el5.cent
Yes. Command line, web based, snmp based, however you like it. You
need the Proliant Support cd's/web pages. Drill into the web page for
the models you are interested.
great thanks - On Dell they call it Open Manage so do you mind telling
me the name that HP use for their tools please? Or
Scott Silva wrote on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:05:09 -0700:
> As long as the partitions were raid-autostart (fd I believe) it should pick
> it up.
Yeah, it wasn't a problem at all.
> Having a CDrom on a channel shouldn't be a problem as long as the drive
> supports UDMA, which I think the modern dri
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Tom Brown wrote:
Hi
We have up until now been a Dell shop but are looking at HP. I would normally
monitor hardware by installing OMSA from dell and then using nagios as the
monitor. Are there tools for HP that would allow me to do similar?
thanks
Yes. Command line,
Hi
We have up until now been a Dell shop but are looking at HP. I would
normally monitor hardware by installing OMSA from dell and then using
nagios as the monitor. Are there tools for HP that would allow me to do
similar?
thanks
___
CentOS mailin
John Thomas wrote:
> Johnny Hughes said the following on 10/21/2007 06:52 AM:
>> There are new RPMS released for nx and freenx in the CentOS-4 and
>> CentOS-5 Extras repository.
>
> Anybody know the main difference(s) between theses and the free ones at
> nomachine.com?
>
> Johnny, thanks for the
Mike Edwards wrote:
> Thank you for the reply, Alain.
>
> Since CentOS doesn't have a recommended on-line upgrade path (why?!), I
> figured I'd go with the recommended path of using the installer. To
> that end, I was wondering if I was missing something (boot option,
> perhaps?) that would tell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://firegpg.tuxfamily.org
iD8DBQFHHKHZNTm8fWdRgmIRAk2XAKDr6201kK65PffUmutDw1wGYSNVHACgrs/T
KlMp1V0ITl1VwT/WJ0XWlsA=
=ccxU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
On 10/20/07, J. Potter
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> Right ... that one connection is the "X0 (local)" connection, that is
>> your "normal local desktop" shared.
>>
>> You will normally not be able to connect to that, and it can be ignored.
>> (Unless you are logged in and have set vino to share your
Johnny Hughes said the following on 10/21/2007 06:52 AM:
There are new RPMS released for nx and freenx in the CentOS-4 and
CentOS-5 Extras repository.
Anybody know the main difference(s) between theses and the free ones at
nomachine.com?
Johnny, thanks for these.
--
Sincerely,
John Thomas
_
Thank you for the reply, Alain.
Since CentOS doesn't have a recommended on-line upgrade path (why?!), I
figured I'd go with the recommended path of using the installer. To
that end, I was wondering if I was missing something (boot option,
perhaps?) that would tell anaconda to bypass the partition
David Hrbáč napsal(a):
> Hi,
> Well, ICH9 support for CentOS as announced on Oct 16th by me
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088104.html has
> been extended. Today I have published x86_64 install DVD. You can find
> it here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/pub/ich9/
> Regards,
> Dav
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Right ... that one connection is the "X0 (local)" connection, that is
your "normal local desktop" shared.
You will normally not be able to connect to that, and it can be ignored.
(Unless you are logged in and have set vino to share your :0 desktop)
I thought the current
available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20071022/866950fd/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:25:42 +1000
From: John Newbigin <[EMAI
On 10/19/07, Johnny Massengill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My company is using Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security Suite 7.0
> for linux. This setup uses Postfix as a mail gateway for MS Exchange.
> The problem I'm having is ever so often Postfix 2.2.11 will lose the
> Transport mapping looku
Hi
The installer way is not the only one to upgrade your system!
Especially if it fail to detect your disk/partitions.
You should be able to to make the upgrade using "yum upgrade/update"
Google on the web about centos upgrade for more info.
Regards.
On 10/21/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else t
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
>
>On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So which version of bind is that?
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] named]# rpm -qa |grep bind
>bind-utils-9.2.4-24.EL4
>bind-libs-9.2.4-24.EL4
>bind-9.2.4-24.EL4
>bind-chroot-9.2.4-24.EL4
>
>
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Mogens Kjaer wrote:
>> Joachim Backes wrote:
>> ...
>>> Known?
>> ...
>>
>> Is you system x86_64, then:
>>
>> http://lists.centos.org/piper
On 10/22/07, Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
>
> Indunil,
>
> The correct solution to deal with this security issue is to update to the
> latest bind of CentOS 4, which already provided a backported fix for this
> problem in CentOS 4.
Than
On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q --changelog bind-libs|grep CVE
> >
> > - fixed cryptographically weak query id generator (CVE-2007-2926)
> > So that has been fixed, as you have been told on Jul
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> > >
> > >Hi,
> > >Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to
> > bind
> > >bind-9.3.3-9.x as bind 9.2.x had a secur
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q --changelog bind-libs|grep CVE
>
> - fixed cryptographically weak query id generator (CVE-2007-2926)
> So that has been fixed, as you have been told on Jul 25th. Why bring
> that up again?
>
>Really sorry.
>I a
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:33:16PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to bind
Make yourself a favor and 'yum update' instead of trying to break
your CentOS-4 by adding CentOS-5 packages.
Current CentOS-4 is 4.5 with bind-libs-9.2.4-2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q --changelog bind-libs|grep CVE
> - fixed cryptographically weak query id generator (CVE-2007-2926)
>
> So that has been fixed, as you have been told on Jul 25th. Why bring
> that up again?
Really sorry.
I also checked. pls see below.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] named]# rpm -
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
>
>On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to
> bind
> >bind-9.3.3-9.x as bind 9.2.x had a sec
On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to
> bind
> >bind-9.3.3-9.x as bind 9.2.x had a security hole.
>
> Which one which isn't fixed in bind-9.2.4-27.0.1.el
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
>
>Hi,
>Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to bind
>bind-9.3.3-9.x as bind 9.2.x had a security hole.
Which one which isn't fixed in bind-9.2.4-27.0.1.el4?
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpbnPlkYx1B7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Bobby wrote:
> On Sunday 21 October 2007 14:11:15 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> Can you look with tcpdump what happens on the network?
>>
>> tcpdump -i any arp
>>
>> should do that.
>
> That's what I've been doing for a couple of days. The requests goes
> unanswered. I'm monitoring all the NICs and c
Hi,
Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to bind
bind-9.3.3-9.x as bind 9.2.x had a security hole. So I downloaded
bind-9.3.3-9.0.1.el5.src.rpm from Centos5 repo and tried to built RPM out of
it. But, I failed to do it.
I got bellow errors.
./dbus_service.c: In function `dbus
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else try if using another mirror helps.
thank you
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
> Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else try if using anoth
Jake Grimmett napsal(a):
> Hi David,
>
> I'm having problems posting this to the message board, hence sending this
> email directly to you:
>
> ***snip**
> Just thought I'd say thanks to David - his image works with the new Dell
> Optiplex 755's in ATA mode (the normal kern
Andrew Allen wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 17:56 -0700, Steven Vishoot wrote:
>> --- Andrew Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to install Skype on a CentOS 4.4 system
>>> and I've followed the
>>> instructions on the Skype website at
>>>
>> http://www.skype.com/download/skype/linux
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
...
Known?
...
Is you system x86_64, then:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088311.html
else try if using another mirror helps.
thank you for your reply, but I did this already before
82 matches
Mail list logo
