[CentOS] Re: fcpci from atrpm-repop and CentOS5-Plus-kernel

Am Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2007 09:45 schrieb Clint Dilks: > Another thing that might work (not having tested this) is creating a > symlink from /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-8.1.14.el5.centos.plus to > /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-8.1.14.el5 This don't work. And now the big surprise ;-) The installed Fritz!PCI -

Re: [CentOS] logrotation

umair shakil wrote: > Dear all Salam, > > i have installed logrotation package in BSD, the script runs every night at > 3:00 pm night and makes > filename.1.gz. but when i use less command to see this gz file it says "do u > want to see binary file??" > through which utility i can see the contants

[CentOS] logrotation

Dear all Salam, i have installed logrotation package in BSD, the script runs every night at 3:00 pm night and makes filename.1.gz. but when i use less command to see this gz file it says "do u want to see binary file??" through which utility i can see the contants of the file??? Regards, Umair S

Re: [CentOS] extras and vlc

Salam, Most likely, for such type of things, i have come accross in google that u have to include the repository path in yum.conf. It is possible that for VLC there is some thing like that... Regards, Umair Shakil ETD On 10/19/07, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What are the chanc

[CentOS] Fwd: squid-2.6 RPM for CentOS 4.5

Hi , I am looking for squid-2.6 RPM for CentOS 4.5. I googled. But, No squid 2.6rpm was found yet. R u rinning squid 2.6 RPM on CentOS 4.x? if so pls let me know. I downloaded this squid-2.6.STABLE6-4.el5 .src.rpm from below link. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/SRPMS/ Is it okay to

[CentOS] Re: ivtv

on 10/18/2007 4:50 PM Jason Pyeron spake the following: I have this old memory that the kernels used are a hodge podge of backports etc. So for a kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.9.EL should I use 0.4.10? Quoted from http://ivtvdriver.org/index.php/Download: The latest stable releases can be found here.

[CentOS] Re: DocX support in OpenOffice

on 10/18/2007 5:08 PM Paul spake the following: On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 11:54 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:45:56 -0600 Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... Perhaps it would help if you pointed out to them that the Open Document Format is an ISO standard for document

Re: [CentOS] program calls system() gettind PID - slightly off topic

On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 08:07:46PM -0400, Jerry Geis alleged: > I have a C program on centos. When I call system("some_program &"); > how do I get the PID of the some_program? > > I cant just list processes as there might be more than one some_program > active. > I need to know the one that I jus

Re: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 11:54 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:45:56 -0600 > Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > > Perhaps it would help if you pointed out to them that the Open > > Document Format is an ISO standard for document storage and > > exchange, and sugge

[CentOS] program calls system() gettind PID - slightly off topic

I have a C program on centos. When I call system("some_program &"); how do I get the PID of the some_program? I cant just list processes as there might be more than one some_program active. I need to know the one that I just started. Thanks, Jerry _

[CentOS] ivtv

I have this old memory that the kernels used are a hodge podge of backports etc. So for a kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.9.EL should I use 0.4.10? Quoted from http://ivtvdriver.org/index.php/Download: The latest stable releases can be found here. Currently this is version 0.4.10 for kernels <= 2.6.15, ve

Re: [CentOS] extras and vlc

On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 03:34:07PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > What are the chances that a package such as vlc from http://videolan.org/vlc > would become included in extras? so a yum install vlc would work. I got vlc by doing "yum install vlc". I think it came from freshrpms. The Centos web site h

[CentOS] Re: Software RAID: on same IDE port or on different ones?

on 10/18/2007 3:54 PM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: Scott Silva wrote on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:51:38 -0700: The speed issue is not the problem. The problem is that if one disk dies while the system is running, it usually locks up the ide channel until a reboot, so the other drive would also

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID: on same IDE port or on different ones?

Scott Silva wrote on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:51:38 -0700: > The speed issue is not the problem. The problem is that if one disk dies > while > the system is running, it usually locks up the ide channel until a reboot, so > the other drive would also be locked. Ah, I see, that makes sense. That so

[CentOS] Re: DocX support in OpenOffice

on 10/18/2007 2:20 PM Morten Torstensen spake the following: Miguel Medalha wrote: It is not only a problem for Linux users. Office 2003/XP/2000 etc can not read these files either. I know many Windows only shops who are pretty annoyed with the upgrade churn Microsoft force on them. A filter t

RE: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

XP/2003 http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=941b3470-3ae9-4aee- 8f43-c6bb74cd1466 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Morten Torstensen Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 2:20 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentO

Re: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

Miguel Medalha wrote: It is not only a problem for Linux users. Office 2003/XP/2000 etc can not read these files either. I know many Windows only shops who are pretty annoyed with the upgrade churn Microsoft force on them. A filter that enables Office 2003 to open DocX files is available free

Re: [CentOS] Re: DocX support in OpenOffice

On Thu, Oct 18, 2007, Scott Silva wrote: >on 10/18/2007 12:03 PM Frank Cox spake the following: ... >>Many people switch to using Linux after they get tired of the crap that >>goes >>along with trying to get things done with Windows. I don't see that as a >>sign >>that there is anything in need

Re: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Morten Torstensen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the basic problem with Linux! Over 1 million office 2007 users and they have to change their software because it does not conform to the "standard". It is not only a problem for Linux users. Office 2003/XP/2000

Re: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

It is not only a problem for Linux users. Office 2003/XP/2000 etc can not read these files either. I know many Windows only shops who are pretty annoyed with the upgrade churn Microsoft force on them. A filter that enables Office 2003 to open DocX files is available free from Microsoft.

Re: [CentOS] NIS problems

On 18/10/2007, Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, John Allen wrote: > > > When you do the ypinit -s, what name do you provide for the server? > > > > It must match the name the server expects, so if the server host name is > > nis, > > then you > > do > > > > ypinit -s

RE: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here is the basic problem with Linux! Over 1 million office 2007 > users and they have to change their software because it does not > conform to the "standard". It is not only a problem for Linux users. Office 2003/XP/2000 etc can not read these files either. I know ma

Re: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the basic problem with Linux! Over 1 million office 2007 users and they have to change their software because it does not conform to the "standard". It is not only a problem for Linux users. Office 2003/XP/2000 etc can not read these files either. I know many

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading Java on CentOS 4.5

On 10/18/07, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > java is a CentOS package. jdk and jre are from Sun. > > > > > > Don't get it directly from Sun. Use the jpackage versions. > > > (The hoops you have to jump through are worth it.) > > > > I'm going to need a wee

[CentOS] Re: DocX support in OpenOffice

on 10/18/2007 12:52 PM Frank Cox spake the following: On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:43:54 -0700 Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And when you are trying to persuade a business to part with their hard earned dollars to deal with your business, asking them to change to suit you will not fly very

[CentOS] Re: Auctex on CentOS 5

on 10/18/2007 10:16 AM James A. Peltier spake the following: Anyone have Auctex for CentOS 5. I found RPMs for el4 but would rather use EL5 RPMs possible. See if you can find src.rpms from the same place. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly

Re: [CentOS] Re: DocX support in OpenOffice

On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:43:54 -0700 Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And when you are trying to > persuade a business to part with their hard earned dollars to deal with your > business, asking them to change to suit you will not fly very far. If they have a problem that they want solved

[CentOS] Re: Software RAID: on same IDE port or on different ones?

on 10/18/2007 7:57 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: I have a general question on software RAID performance. If using two IDE disks on RAID 1: is there much of a difference performancewise if I put both on one IDE port as master and slave or should I better put them on seperate ports. I reme

Re: [CentOS] NIS problems

I'm at a complete loss as to what is going on. I changed kernels and disabled the video driver, removed the firewire card. NIS refuses to work on this workstation. Unless this gets figured out, I'm going to simply have to create local user accounts, then let NFS take over. It would be re

[CentOS] Re: DocX support in OpenOffice

on 10/18/2007 12:03 PM Frank Cox spake the following: On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:54:26 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the basic problem with Linux! Over 1 million office 2007 users and they have to change their software because it does not conform to the "standard". What problem? A stan

[CentOS] extras and vlc

What are the chances that a package such as vlc from http://videolan.org/vlc would become included in extras? so a yum install vlc would work. Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

On 10/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:45:56 -0600 > Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > > Perhaps it would help if you pointed out to them that the Open > > Document Format is an ISO standard for document storage and > > exchange, and suggest

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading Java on CentOS 4.5

- "Scott Moseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > On 10/18/07, Matthew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > java is a CentOS package. jdk and jre are from Sun. > > > > Don't get it directly from Sun. Use the jpackage versions. > > (The hoops you have to jump through are worth it.) > >

Re: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:54:26 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here is the basic problem with Linux! Over 1 million office 2007 > users and they have to change their software because it does not > conform to the "standard". What problem? A standard file format is just that: standard. If you ch

Re: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:45:56 -0600 Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > Perhaps it would help if you pointed out to them that the Open > Document Format is an ISO standard for document storage and > exchange, and suggest that they use that instead. ... Here is the basic problem with Linux!

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading Java on CentOS 4.5

On 10/18/07, Matthew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > java is a CentOS package. jdk and jre are from Sun. > > Don't get it directly from Sun. Use the jpackage versions. > (The hoops you have to jump through are worth it.) > I'm going to need a wee bit more direction. I don't see any newer

Re: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:03:54 +0100 (BST) first last <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By the way, telling your clients to upload again in a different format > is never an option, especially if the files are generated from > automated systems. They will just choose a different provider that > doesn't re

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading Java on CentOS 4.5

- "Scott Moseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > # rpm -qa | grep -E '^(java|jdk|jre)-' > jre-1.6.0_03-fcs > java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-27jpp > jdk-1.6.0_03-fcs > > java is a CentOS package. jdk and jre are from Sun. > (I need Java >= 1.5.0 for an application I'm installing.) > > # upda

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading Java on CentOS 4.5

On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 01:32:14PM -0500, Scott Moseman wrote: > java is a CentOS package. jdk and jre are from Sun. Don't get it directly from Sun. Use the jpackage versions. (The hoops you have to jump through are worth it.) -- Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[CentOS] Upgrading Java on CentOS 4.5

# rpm -qa | grep -E '^(java|jdk|jre)-' jre-1.6.0_03-fcs java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-27jpp jdk-1.6.0_03-fcs java is a CentOS package. jdk and jre are from Sun. (I need Java >= 1.5.0 for an application I'm installing.) # update-alternatives --config java There are 1 programs which provide 'java

Re: [CentOS] yumgroups.xml

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 13:27 -0400, Scott A. McClanahan wrote: > Not sure if I’m overlooking this somehow but is there a yumgroups.xml > file for the [base] repository in CentOS 5? I’ve checked a few > mirrors and didn’t see it and a `yum grouplist` with only the base, > updates, and extras reposit

[CentOS] yumgroups.xml

Not sure if I'm overlooking this somehow but is there a yumgroups.xml file for the [base] repository in CentOS 5? I've checked a few mirrors and didn't see it and a `yum grouplist` with only the base, updates, and extras repositories enabled looks like this: Setting up Group Process Setting u

[CentOS] Auctex on CentOS 5

Anyone have Auctex for CentOS 5. I found RPMs for el4 but would rather use EL5 RPMs possible. -- James A. Peltier Technical Director, RHCE SCIRF | GrUVi @ Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-3610 Fax : 778-782-3045 Mobile : 778-840-6434 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] We

Re: [CentOS] /tmp

On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:35:59PM -0300, Centos wrote: > the tmpwatch in crontab is as follow , and I believe it should remove > the files after 240 hours, > but as far as I see , it removes them much more earlier. > more /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch > /usr/sbin/tmpwatch -x /tmp/.X11-unix -x /tmp/.XI

Re: [CentOS] /tmp

Thanks Mogen, the tmpwatch in crontab is as follow , and I believe it should remove the files after 240 hours, but as far as I see , it removes them much more earlier. more /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch /usr/sbin/tmpwatch -x /tmp/.X11-unix -x /tmp/.XIM-unix -x /tmp/.font-unix -x /tmp/.ICE-u

Re: [CentOS] Changing php5 with php4 in CentOS 5

John Allen wrote on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:02:48 +0100: > Fix you pages to work with PHP5 as well as PHP4, it should be pretty easy. Indeed. Watch the error messages and then fix one by one. Most likely there's a MySQL driver problem. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive

[CentOS] Software RAID: on same IDE port or on different ones?

I have a general question on software RAID performance. If using two IDE disks on RAID 1: is there much of a difference performancewise if I put both on one IDE port as master and slave or should I better put them on seperate ports. I remember from olde days that it was recommended to put CD an

Re: [CentOS] /tmp

Centos wrote: > Hello > > Does every thing in /tmp directory will be removed when centos rebooted ? No, but... > is there any where that we can change this settings ? the cleanup is done by tmpwatch. man tmpwatch cat /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer De

Re: [CentOS] /tmp

On 10/18/07, Centos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > Does every thing in /tmp directory will be removed when centos rebooted ? > is there any where that we can change this settings ? /tmp is basically a scratch pad for the system. There's not supposed to be anything of any permenance in ther

Re: [CentOS] NIS problems

An interesting sidenote - Things do work fine on another test setup consisting of C5 64-bit and an Intel NIC. The problem C5 64-bit system has a Broadcom 57xx NIC. I may opt to change NICs and see if that makes any difference... Scott On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, John Allen wrote: When you do th

Re: [CentOS] NIS problems

On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, John Allen wrote: When you do the ypinit -s, what name do you provide for the server? It must match the name the server expects, so if the server host name is nis, then you do ypinit -s nis.domainname I have successfully done ypinit -s ip_address or hostname on several

Re: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

> Is that the new Microsoft format? Support for that is planned in > OpenOffice version 3, afaik. You should ask the creators of the > X-formats (x-files? hehe) .docx, .xlsx etc save in an earlier format > and send to you. Unfortunately, it's not that easy. At work we run an application that re

Re: [CentOS] Changing php5 with php4 in CentOS 5

Can Cizer wrote: Hi, In our server CentOS 5 is installed. Some of our web pages are compatible with php4 but in centOS 5 , php5 is installed and we cannot see our pages. I want to remove php5 and install php4 but i could not find php4 rpm for CentOS 5. Can anybody help me? Fix you pages

Re: [CentOS] NIS problems

When you do the ypinit -s, what name do you provide for the server? It must match the name the server expects, so if the server host name is nis, then you do ypinit -s nis.domainname Scott Ehrlich wrote: On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, sam wrote: so... if i'm understanding: -you have a 32bit NIS se

[CentOS] /tmp

Hello Does every thing in /tmp directory will be removed when centos rebooted ? is there any where that we can change this settings ? Regards Babak ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: Changing php5 with php4 in CentOS 5

Can Cizer wrote: In our server CentOS 5 is installed. Some of our web pages are compatible with php4 but in centOS 5 , php5 is installed and we cannot see our pages. I want to remove php5 and install php4 but i could not find php4 rpm for CentOS 5. Can anybody help me? depending on what you

Re: [CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

first last wrote: Has anyone got the docx plugin for OpenOffice 2 running in CentOS? Is that the new Microsoft format? Support for that is planned in OpenOffice version 3, afaik. You should ask the creators of the X-formats (x-files? hehe) .docx, .xlsx etc save in an earlier format and send

Re: [CentOS] centos base install

On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 08:46:29PM +0800, Mark Quitoriano enlightened us: > im trying to create a trimmed down version of centos. just the base > installation no services or anything, if i can trim it down to kernel bash > and yum only working that would be great. What programs and dependencies i >

[CentOS] centos base install

Hi, im trying to create a trimmed down version of centos. just the base installation no services or anything, if i can trim it down to kernel bash and yum only working that would be great. What programs and dependencies i need for this kind of installation? thanks! ___

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 32, Issue 11

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

[CentOS] Changing php5 with php4 in CentOS 5

Hi, In our server CentOS 5 is installed. Some of our web pages are compatible with php4 but in centOS 5 , php5 is installed and we cannot see our pages. I want to remove php5 and install php4 but i could not find php4 rpm for CentOS 5. Can anybody help me? Thanks Can Çizer _

[CentOS] DocX support in OpenOffice

Has anyone got the docx plugin for OpenOffice 2 running in CentOS? I have tried using the OpenOffice.org rpms and the ones in CentOS, but the plugin does not seem to work. To get it working I extracted the rpm from Novell, then copied the files to the registry/ folders and the Odfconverter to the

Re: [CentOS] Trying to create a custom initrd that will work with PXE Booting

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 22:13 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to create a custom initrd that will work with PXE Booting on > CentOS release 4.5 (Final) and Fedora Core 6. Can anyone point me to > some documentation that will help with this ? > > The specific situation is that we

Re: [CentOS] Trying to create a custom initrd that will work with PXE Booting

Clint Dilks wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to create a custom initrd that will work with PXE Booting on > CentOS release 4.5 (Final) and Fedora Core 6. Can anyone point me to > some documentation that will help with this ? I've done this for F7 (the NIC is detected by the default e1000, but fails

Re: [CentOS] Trying to create a custom initrd that will work with PXE Booting

Clint Dilks wrote: Hi, I am trying to create a custom initrd that will work with PXE Booting on CentOS release 4.5 (Final) and Fedora Core 6. Can anyone point me to some documentation that will help with this ? The specific situation is that we have received some machines that need the lat

[CentOS] Trying to create a custom initrd that will work with PXE Booting

Hi, I am trying to create a custom initrd that will work with PXE Booting on CentOS release 4.5 (Final) and Fedora Core 6. Can anyone point me to some documentation that will help with this ? The specific situation is that we have received some machines that need the latest e1000 Driver fro

Re: [CentOS] SMART Prefailure Attribute messages

On Wednesday 17 October 2007 14:59:36 Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > Hello, > My machine is running Software RAID 5 on /dev/hde1, /dev/hdg1,/dev/hdi1. I > noticed on the log that suddenly we are getting messages such as : > > Oct 14 01:27:16 localhost smartd[4801]: Device: /dev/hde, SMART Prefailure

Re: [CentOS] drbd

Fabian Arrotin wrote: You're right, it's missing from the wiki page and that will be updated to reflect that ... I think there's another wiki page error, on Heartbeat, the file /var/lib/heartbeat/crb/cib.xml should be /var/lib/heartbeat/crm/cib.xml if I install an edited version of that fi