What's the best multi-threaded / multi-process io-benchmark utility that
works with filesystems instead of raw devices? and can read/write multiple
files at once..
http://untroubled.org/benchmarking/2004-04/
No raw numbers but...
___
CentOS mailing
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:51:50PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > > Simon Banton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >What I did to work ar
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:56:17PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:57:28PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > > > Simon Banton wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > At 12:30 +0
At Tue, 2 Oct 2007 it looks like Alfred von Campe composed:
> > I am trying to exclude a directory (and all file and sub-directories
> > under that directory) when using rsync.
> >
> > I have spent two days on google, but everything that I can find there
> > involves excluding individual files, no
Matthew Miller wrote:
Do you have redhat-rpm-config installed?
Or let me put that more strongly. :)
Clearly, you do not have redhat-rpm-config installed. You need it.
Jz!
Never knew about it.
Thanks a million Matthew.
Regards,
A.S
___
Cent
This may work. If worked, Pls reply to the list by appending SOLVED to the
subject line. Then, Others can beniit.
rsync -avz --delete --exclude=**/stats --exclude=**/error
--exclude=**/files/pictures -e "ssh -i /root/rsync/mirror-rsync-key"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/www/ /var/www/
(The --delete opt
I am trying to exclude a directory (and all file and sub-directories
under that directory) when using rsync.
I have spent two days on google, but everything that I can find there
involves excluding individual files, not an entire directory.
Have you tried a simple "rsync --exclude remove_dir ..
Hello Everyone,
I am trying to exclude a directory (and all file and sub-directories
under that directory) when using rsync.
I have spent two days on google, but everything that I can find there
involves excluding individual files, not an entire directory.
I have tried the following commands, bu
b.
http://www.howtoforge.com/preventing_ssh_dictionary_attacks_with_denyhosts
Since taking care of these things I've had no more trouble and since
installing DenyHosts I haven't had to spend anywhere the amount of
time making adjustments to my firewall either.
Thanks. I just cant figure ou
I just want to confirm that this is a "bug" before reporting it to Bugzilla.
I started with the sample named.conf included in the distribution and found
that I couldn't query my server from outside my LAN. I finally traced it
down to the match expressions in the sample's external view.
bind-9
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:15:44AM -0400, David Mackintosh wrote:
> Ok, so if you tuned in last time, I couldn't make the installation/upgrade of
> PHP5 from the Centos4 CentOS Plus repository work. Not one to be easilly
> dissuaded, I shapened my shovel and dug myself a hole.
[...]
> Now, my us
Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 28 September 2007
02:14:30 mark pryor wrote:
> hello,
>
> Does our beloved Centos project have a page where one can request that an
> RPM package be built, especially for C5? How about alerts when those
> requests have been satisfied?
>
Hello,
I have a CentOS install that has updated packages, and different users with
certain privileges and modified GNOME menus. When a user logs in they are
very limited to what they can do. i.e. browse the internet, run some php
scripts on the local MySQL database I have set and that's about i
Hey,
I'm trying to run a kickstart script on a new piece of hardware...
I've never used this HW before, so it's possible that there may be
something faulty...
After the DVD boots, I type "linux ks=http://blah/blah.ks"; and hit enter.
Once I get to the anaconda line which says "running /sbin/load
Scott Silva wrote:
Are you using the latest from www.logwatch.org (7.3.6) or the old
version bundled with CentOS?
I am using the base yum repos. No time to remember to chase down a
myriad of different program packages from different websites. I am sure
this problem is solved in newer logwatch
on 10/2/2007 11:36 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 10/2/2007 9:45 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
I sometimes clone working machines by separating RAID1 mirrors and
letting each re-sync with a new partner in different machines. What
will happen if a mismatched
on 10/2/2007 12:29 PM Chris Mauritz spake the following:
I've been handed a Supermicro system that is using the Intel� H6300ESB
Serial ATA Controller (Supermicro P4SCI motherboard). When I install
CentOS5, everything seems to work OK, but it has absolutely horrid disk
performance. Upon furthe
Chris Mauritz wrote:
I've been handed a Supermicro system that is using the Intel® H6300ESB
Serial ATA Controller (Supermicro P4SCI motherboard). When I install
CentOS5, everything seems to work OK, but it has absolutely horrid
disk performance. Upon further inspection, it seems that the SATA
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:57:28PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > > Simon Banton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >What I did to work around
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > Simon Banton wrote:
> > >
> > > At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
> > > >
> > > >What I did to work around them was basically switching
> to XFS for
> > > >everything except / (3ware
I've been handed a Supermicro system that is using the Intel® H6300ESB
Serial ATA Controller (Supermicro P4SCI motherboard). When I install
CentOS5, everything seems to work OK, but it has absolutely horrid disk
performance. Upon further inspection, it seems that the SATA disks are
being trea
hi all!!
i have som experince with xen in other distros, i never used xenmanager
or interfaces do work with xen, im trying to install a centos5 guest ,
but i get always the same error "virDomainCreateLinux() failed", i have
selinux disabled, no firewall, using mirror
http://centos.oi.com.br/5.0/o
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:57:28PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > Simon Banton wrote:
> > >
> > > At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
> > > >
> > > >What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
Scott Silva wrote:
on 10/2/2007 9:45 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
I sometimes clone working machines by separating RAID1 mirrors and
letting each re-sync with a new partner in different machines. What
will happen if a mismatched pair of these drives ever end up together
in the same ma
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> Simon Banton wrote:
> >
> > At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
> > >
> > >What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
> > >everything except / (3ware say their cards are fast, but only on
> >
Simon Banton wrote:
>
> At 13:03 -0400 2/10/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >Have you tried calculating the performance of your current drives on
> >paper to see if it matches your "reality"? It may just be that your
> >disks suck...
>
> They're performing to spec for 7200rpm SATA II drives - your
on 10/2/2007 9:45 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
I sometimes clone working machines by separating RAID1 mirrors and
letting each re-sync with a new partner in different machines. What
will happen if a mismatched pair of these drives ever end up together in
the same machine? If there is
At 13:03 -0400 2/10/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Have you tried calculating the performance of your current drives on
paper to see if it matches your "reality"? It may just be that your
disks suck...
They're performing to spec for 7200rpm SATA II drives - your help in
determining which was the
on 10/2/2007 3:41 AM Morten Torstensen spake the following:
On CentOS5 with the latest updates applied, the logwatch filter for
postfix returns way too many lines from the log. I get an "unmatched
entries" message and all messages that have gone through the system is
listed.
Here is an exampl
Simon Banton wrote:
>
> At 12:41 -0400 2/10/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >If the performance issue is identical to the kernel bug mentioned
> >in the posting then the only real fix that was mentioned was to
> >switch to 32bit from 64bit or to down-rev your kernel, which on
> >CentOS means to go
Simon Banton wrote:
>
> >What is the recurring performance problem you are seeing?
>
> Pretty much exactly the symptoms described in
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7372 relating to read
> starvation under heavy write IO causing sluggish system response.
>
> I recently graphed the
Sorry for the delay - I got pulled off to another cirtical project for
a while. Thanks for the info on crypt guys...
I still haven't solved this problem... I've tried mulitple different
copies of the string - and it is the complete string. The next thing
I'm going to try is a different password
At 12:41 -0400 2/10/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
If the performance issue is identical to the kernel bug mentioned
in the posting then the only real fix that was mentioned was to
switch to 32bit from 64bit or to down-rev your kernel, which on
CentOS means to go down to 4.5 from 5.0.
The irony i
I sometimes clone working machines by separating RAID1 mirrors and
letting each re-sync with a new partner in different machines. What
will happen if a mismatched pair of these drives ever end up together in
the same machine? If there is any chance that they would automatically
be paired, is
CentOS List wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My denyhosts stop working. How do i check why isnt it working anymore
> for me?
>
> Thanks
>
[snipped log entries]
at the risk alarming you at this point I strongly recommend you run
chkrootkit on your system. If your system has been compromised then
that in and of
Simon Banton wrote:
>
> >What is the recurring performance problem you are seeing?
>
> Pretty much exactly the symptoms described in
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7372 relating to read
> starvation under heavy write IO causing sluggish system response.
>
> I recently graphed the
What is the recurring performance problem you are seeing?
Pretty much exactly the symptoms described in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7372 relating to read
starvation under heavy write IO causing sluggish system response.
I recently graphed the blocks in/blocks out from vmstat 1
Hi,
My denyhosts stop working. How do i check why isnt it working anymore for
me?
Thanks
Oct 2 22:59:17 beyond sshd[15690]: Failed password for root from
221.7.37.142 port 49836 ssh2
Oct 2 22:59:17 beyond sshd[15692]: Received disconnect from 221.7.37.142:
11: Bye Bye
Oct 2 22:59:18 beyo
chloe K wrote:
Hi all
I am wandering how to control /proc/sys/fs/file-max
ls it automatically?
and what is for?
and the maxium?
Thank you
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. *Go to
Yahoo! Ans
Greg Swallow wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
Has someone else gotta LPRng to work on CentOS 5?
Sorry, I wasn't subscribed to the list when this message was posted, so my
reply won't be threaded properly...
Anyways, we build LPRng rpms for SME Server, which is based on CentOS. (7.x =
Simon Banton wrote:
>
> At 09:24 -0400 2/10/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >Actually the real-real fix was to use the 'deadline' or
> 'noop' scheduler
> >with this card as the default 'cfq' scheduler was designed
> to work with
> >a single drive and not a multiple drive RAID, so it acts as
> a
Simon Banton wrote:
>
> At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
> >
> >What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
> >everything except / (3ware say their cards are fast, but only on
> >XFS) AND using very low nr_requests for every blockdev on the 3ware
> >card.
>
At 09:24 -0400 2/10/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Actually the real-real fix was to use the 'deadline' or 'noop' scheduler
with this card as the default 'cfq' scheduler was designed to work with
a single drive and not a multiple drive RAID, so it acts as a govenor on
the amount of IO that a single
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:34:15PM +0200, Morten Torstensen wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
> >Yeah. My fix was to copy the services/postfix file in to
> > /etc/logwatch/scripts/services/postfix
> >and edit the file.
>
> Thanks, your patch solved the problem for me. Tho all the config files
> ar
matthias platzer wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> i saw this thread a bit late, but I had /am having the exact
> same issues
> on a dual-2-core-cpu opteron box with a 9550SX. (Centos 5 x86_64)
> What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
> everything except / (3ware say their cards
At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
everything except / (3ware say their cards are fast, but only on
XFS) AND using very low nr_requests for every blockdev on the 3ware
card.
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for this. In my C
I found wxWidgets at
http://rpms.jackal-net.at/yum/centos/4/repodata/repoview/X11.Libraries.group.html
Thanks
Adriano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:27:36 -0300
Adriano Frare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and
scribbled:
Dear Friends,
I need RPM for CENTOS 4.5 to
Hi all
I am wandering how to control /proc/sys/fs/file-max
ls it automatically?
and what is for?
and the maxium?
Thank you
-
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo!
Answers. ___
Morten Torstensen wrote:
Anyway, patching /usr/share/logwatch/services/postfix with your patch
fixed it.
/usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/postfix of course...
--
//Morten Torstensen
//Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And if it turns out that there is a G
Les Bell wrote:
You can suppress messages by adding regexp patterns to
/etc/logwatch/conf/ignore.conf. For example:
Thanks, that can be a handy way too. But I preferred to fix the filter
and will keep ignore.conf as a last stopgap measure.
--
//Morten Torstensen
//Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
Stephen Harris wrote:
Yeah. My fix was to copy the services/postfix file in to
/etc/logwatch/scripts/services/postfix
and edit the file.
Thanks, your patch solved the problem for me. Tho all the config files
are under /usr/share/logwatch on my system. There are some stubs in
/etc/logwatch
Rajeev R Veedu wrote:
I have a cups setup for printing purpose. The problem I am facing is
that it doesn’t print more than 1 copy of the same document in single
print command.
could someone guide me how to fix this problem?.
Did you use "lp -n filename..." or "lpr -#
filename..."?
This con
I have a cups setup for printing purpose. The problem I am facing is that it
doesn't print more than 1 copy of the same document in single print command.
could someone guide me how to fix this problem?.
Rajeev R. Veedu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:41:28PM +0200, Morten Torstensen wrote:
> On CentOS5 with the latest updates applied, the logwatch filter for
> postfix returns way too many lines from the log. I get an "unmatched
> entries" message and all messages that have gone through the system is
> listed.
Yeah
Morten Torstensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
On CentOS5 with the latest updates applied, the logwatch filter for
postfix returns way too many lines from the log. I get an "unmatched
entries" message and all messages that have gone through the system is
listed.
<<
You can suppress messages by
>
> Thank you so much for helping me
>
> Now I am trying to use the following command to backup
> all files in hda to sda3 (mount on seconddrive folder)
> in the same machine and also excludes
>
> /usr/bin/rsync -avz --exclude=/boot1
> --exclude=/seconddrive --exclude=/proc /* /seconddrive
try be
On CentOS5 with the latest updates applied, the logwatch filter for
postfix returns way too many lines from the log. I get an "unmatched
entries" message and all messages that have gone through the system is
listed.
Here is an example:
8F930A8092: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, orig_to=<[EMAIL PROTE
hello,
i saw this thread a bit late, but I had /am having the exact same issues
on a dual-2-core-cpu opteron box with a 9550SX. (Centos 5 x86_64)
What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
everything except / (3ware say their cards are fast, but only on XFS)
AND using ve
Frank Cox wrote:
OS: CentOS 5.0 x86.
I am a programmer, relatively new to GNU/Linux and am looking for cross
platform GUI development, mainly for EL5 and Windows. I have found
wxWidgets so far. I prefer drag 'n drop programming IDEs, QT seems to
provide this for GNU/Linux, but it isn't free
59 matches
Mail list logo
