On 26/07/07, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> not many support dvd-ram, however, which was buried in his list.
>
> otherwise, I'd say any $34.95 LiteOn or LG drive could do all the rest
> of that without a hitch, SATA or PATA.
LG ones usually do DVD-RAM. It's one of their sales slogan.
-
Camron W. Fox wrote:
DVD hyper multidrive, capable of reading and writing DVD-R, DVD-RW,
DVD+R, DVD+RW, DVD-RAM, DVD-R for DL, and DVD+R DL.
I've used an Optiarc to burn all that in Linux, some with cdrecord some
with NeroLinux. Optiarc is a joint NEC/Sony company. DVD drives/burners
are comm
On 25/07/07 10:38 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
They are kept functional and secure. I think that is enough
in many cases.
If someone really needs a special app they can always compile
it and/or
install it in their $HOME.
Are you saying that you predict users will not need any new
compati
On 7/26/07, Jay Leafey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running bind on centOS5. I use RPM.
> Is there a patch ?
> Any idea to apply the patch?
>
> From "rpm -q --changelog bind-libs-9.3.3-9.0.1.el5":
> * Thu Jul 19 2007 Adam Tkac 30:9.3.3-9.0.1
> - fixed c
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Hi,
I am running bind on centOS5. I use RPM.
Is there a patch ?
Any idea to apply the patch?
From "rpm -q --changelog bind-libs-9.3.3-9.0.1.el5":
* Thu Jul 19 2007 Adam Tkac 30:9.3.3-9.0.1
- fixed cryptographically weak query id generator (CVE-2007-2926)
If yo
Camron W. Fox wrote:
Alle,
Our customer is looking for a drive with the following specs that
works (but is not necessarily supported by the vendor, that would be
gravy) on CentOS4/5:
DVD hyper multidrive, capable of reading and writing DVD-R, DVD-RW,
DVD+R, DVD+RW, DVD-RAM, DVD-R for DL
Alle,
Our customer is looking for a drive with the following specs that works
(but is not necessarily supported by the vendor, that would be gravy) on
CentOS4/5:
DVD hyper multidrive, capable of reading and writing DVD-R, DVD-RW,
DVD+R, DVD+RW, DVD-RAM, DVD-R for DL, and DVD+R DL.
The HP
Thank you Ugo,
But I was asking about Cricket and not Cacti.
please let me know if you have installed Cricket as well.
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Centos wrote:
Hello
Has any one installed Cricket on Cenos ?
it seems there is a patch that should apply on Format.pm to specify
Achitecture,
but I c
--- Timothy Selivanow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 11:21 -0700, Steven Vishoot
> wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > i am not sure if this is a concern, but if you are
> > running x86_64 desktop systems then i would
> suggest
> > putting the 32 bit centos. this will make life a
> lot
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 07:35:58PM -0400, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> >Brett Schroeder wrote:
> >>Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I installed sendmail on a centos-4 openvz VM. I set up SMTP-AUTH
> >>>and when I try to send mail using this server, there is a big de
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Brett Schroeder wrote:
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
I installed sendmail on a centos-4 openvz VM. I set up SMTP-AUTH
and when I try to send mail using this server, there is a big delay in
which my e-mail client (Mozilla Thunderbird) just hangs. The server, on
the other
Brett Schroeder wrote:
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Hi,
I installed sendmail on a centos-4 openvz VM. I set up SMTP-AUTH
and when I try to send mail using this server, there is a big delay in
which my e-mail client (Mozilla Thunderbird) just hangs. The server, on
the other hand, is idle at the s
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed sendmail on a centos-4 openvz VM. I set up SMTP-AUTH
> and when I try to send mail using this server, there is a big delay in
> which my e-mail client (Mozilla Thunderbird) just hangs. The server, on
> the other hand, is idle at the same time. It
My recommendation:
CentOS 5 --or-- Ubuntu LTS
Cheers,
Devin
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 23/07/07, Kay Diederichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wanted to try XFS with the normal kernel but I get:
After all, did you load the module?
--
Alvin Chang Yu-Ming
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
Centos wrote:
Hello
Has any one installed Cricket on Cenos ?
it seems there is a patch that should apply on Format.pm to specify
Achitecture,
but I can not find it .
Thanks
I wrote an how-to on the centos wiki on it. Make sure you use PHP5.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Cacti_on_CentOS_4.
Hello
Has any one installed Cricket on Cenos ?
it seems there is a patch that should apply on Format.pm to specify
Achitecture,
but I can not find it .
Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
I installed sendmail on a centos-4 openvz VM. I set up SMTP-AUTH and
when I try to send mail using this server, there is a big delay in which
my e-mail client (Mozilla Thunderbird) just hangs. The server, on the
other hand, is idle at the same time. It does that no matter if I use
no
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 11:21 -0700, Steven Vishoot wrote:
> hello,
>
> i am not sure if this is a concern, but if you are
> running x86_64 desktop systems then i would suggest
> putting the 32 bit centos. this will make life a lot
> more pleasant for you when installing firefox and
> other apps. if
--- Feizhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave K wrote:
> > On 7/25/07, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I agree completely. I don't see any real
> showstoppers that would
> >> prevent it from being a fine desktop. There are
> a few extras that I'd
> >> want to grab from the
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > I haven't run any updates on my systems recently, but now I'm trying to
> > get them up to date again. When I run a yum update, I get this error:
> >
> > Error: Missing Dependency: initscripts >= 7.93.26.EL-1 is needed by
> > package httpd
>
> Sho
Hello!
Need to install the required rpmz to support 32bit apps on 64bit Centos 4.
How to find out which rpmz are needed?
TIA
Tony
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I haven't run any updates on my systems recently, but now I'm trying to
> get them up to date again. When I run a yum update, I get this error:
>
> Error: Missing Dependency: initscripts >= 7.93.26.EL-1 is needed by
> package httpd
Show us the output of "yum -d 5 update", p
I haven't run any updates on my systems recently, but now I'm trying to
get them up to date again. When I run a yum update, I get this error:
Error: Missing Dependency: initscripts >= 7.93.26.EL-1 is needed by
package httpd
I did a Google search, but I didn't find anything relating directly to
C
> Feizhou wrote:
> If you are using Bind as your caching name server, please take note.
>
> http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=5366
>
> I use DJB's dnscache so I could care less.
Feizhou,
You could care less? Huh?
Come on now Feiz you old salty dog.
Your love shows, you posted to th
I will be out of the office starting 07/25/2007 and will not return until
07/26/2007.
I will respond to your message when I return or if you need some
application you can follow these redirection below.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:/
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 16:12 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 22:21 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > > [Sun Jul 22 13:04:32 2007] [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN)
> > > `localhost.localdomain' does NOT match server name!?
> > > [Sun Jul
Dave K wrote:
On 7/25/07, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree completely. I don't see any real showstoppers that would
prevent it from being a fine desktop. There are a few extras that I'd
want to grab from the Fedora repos, but you can't beat the
cost/stability/speedy updates/7
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:27:10 +0200
Peter Kjellstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Dave K wrote:
> > On 7/25/07, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I agree completely. I don't see any real showstoppers that would
> > > prevent it from being a fine desktop. Th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Kjellstrom
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:27 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos as a desktop, advisable?
>
> On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Dave K wrote:
> > On 7/25/07, C
ok, the file system is ext and block size is the default which is 4096,
so I should be able to have 16 Tera Byte filesystem and 2 Tera Byte
files size.
I had to transfer some files which the total size was about 250 G
so I used tar -zcvf to tar and gzip them , but server crashed and rebooted
tw
On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Dave K wrote:
> On 7/25/07, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree completely. I don't see any real showstoppers that would
> > prevent it from being a fine desktop. There are a few extras that I'd
> > want to grab from the Fedora repos, but you can't beat
On 7/25/07, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree completely. I don't see any real showstoppers that would
prevent it from being a fine desktop. There are a few extras that I'd
want to grab from the Fedora repos, but you can't beat the
cost/stability/speedy updates/7 year EOL with a
Centos wrote:
> Thank you Jim,
>
> How can I find the current block size and file system type ?
>
File system type can be found in 3rd column of /etc/fstab.
For ext{2,3} file systems the block size can be found by
tune2fs -l /dev/ | grep "Block size"
where XXX is something like
1) sda1 (f
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Scott Moseman wrote:
I'm running CentOS on my server and I don't feel it makes a great
desktop since several of the major applications (OpenOffice, Firefox,
etc) lag behind since it follows RHEL. I prefer to use something more
dynamic and current on the desktop.
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:47:17 +0200, Ralph wrote:
> Scott Moseman wrote:
> > I'm running CentOS on my server and I don't feel it makes a
> > great desktop since several of the major applications
> > (OpenOffice, Firefox, etc) lag behind since it follows
> > RHEL. I prefer to use something more dyn
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Moseman
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 9:24 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos as a desktop, advisable?
>
> I'm running CentOS on my server and I don't feel it makes a
Scott Moseman wrote:
> I'm running CentOS on my server and I don't feel it makes a great
> desktop since several of the major applications (OpenOffice, Firefox,
> etc) lag behind since it follows RHEL. I prefer to use something more
> dynamic and current on the desktop.
Would you say the same if
Thank you Jim,
How can I find the current block size and file system type ?
Jim Perrin wrote:
On 7/25/07, Centos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the largest file size that can be created on Linux ?
is there any limitation ?
This depends on several things, including the architecture (x86
I'm running CentOS on my server and I don't feel it makes a great
desktop since several of the major applications (OpenOffice, Firefox,
etc) lag behind since it follows RHEL. I prefer to use something more
dynamic and current on the desktop.
Thanks,
Scott
On 7/24/07, beast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 7/25/07, Centos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the largest file size that can be created on Linux ?
is there any limitation ?
This depends on several things, including the architecture (x86_64 vs
x86) and the blocksize used for the filesystem.
For ext3, it breaks out like this ->
Block
Hello
What is the largest file size that can be created on Linux ?
is there any limitation ?
Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mark Rose wrote:
I took a stab at making a bootable CentOS 5 Live USB pendrive and I
ended up with a kernel panic. I was able to do this with a live CD of
CentOS 4, but it seems the same procedure does not work for the new
version.
Has anyone bee
Hi,
I am still runnig Redhat 9 box with sendmail and squid.
how is squid configured? it can be configured to eat up quite a
bit of RAM. if you tweak that to fit into your 512MB of RAM you may be
able to get your machine running fas
-libs-9.3.3-9.0.1.el5.i386.rpm
bind-libs-9.3.3-9.0.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
bind-sdb-9.3.3-9.0.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
bind-utils-9.3.3-9.0.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
caching-nameserver-9.3.3-9.0.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
src:
bind-9.3.3-9.0.1.el5.src.rpm
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
N
Adriatik Allamani wrote:
> How about the other Linux OS?
> Feodora is able to serve AD?
No ... samba 3 can not be an AD Domain Controller.
Samba 4 will be able to be an AD Domain controller, however it is not
fully functional yet.
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Main_Page#Samba4
Please do not t
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 13:28:07 Adriatik Allamani wrote:
> How about the other Linux OS?
> Feodora is able to serve AD?
No, it applies to all Linux distros.
PS. Please avoid top-posting
--
Tomasz Napierala
System Administrator
Allegro Team
http://www.allegro.pl/
_
Alexander Georgiev wrote:
>> Basically, the Samba that comes with CentOS-4 or CentOS-5 can do a
>> WindowsNT type domain via LDAP. You can connect Windows servers and
>> Clients (2000, 2003, XP ... not sure about vista) to this kind of domain
>> and share printers, file servers, etc.
>
> LDAP is
How about the other Linux OS?
Feodora is able to serve AD?
Regards
Adriatik Allamani
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 09:41 +0200, Andreas Rogge wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 25.07.2007, 09:05 +0200 schrieb Adriatik Allamani:
> > Thanks a lot for the help.
> >
> > Actually I am interested in using CentOS as
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 13:36 +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> I am still runnig Redhat 9 box with sendmail and squid. It is quite
> slow. It has only 128 MB RAM. So I upgraded it to 512 MB RAM. Now, It
> is running with 512 MB RAM. But, It is still slow. No progress has
> been achived. Some users
Rogelio Bastardo wrote:
> I'm looking to install n2rrd, which requires Perl 5.8.x
> (http://n2rrd.diglinks.com/cgi-bin/trac.cgi)
>
> I see that lots of Perl stuff is installed. Do I just need to yum
> upgrade perl-libwww-perl-5.78.5 to the latest?
>
> Here's what I have installed perl-wise:
>
> per
This is a Centos List. Not a RH9 List. In any case, you want to look for
cpu hoggers and/or heavy I/O activity. In the latter case, you will have
to guess who the culprit is or get atsar with an appropriate kernel patch.
atop, atop...
___
CentOS mai
On 7/25/07, Indunil Jayasooriya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am still runnig Redhat 9 box with sendmail and squid. It is quite slow. It
has only 128 MB RAM. So I upgraded it to 512 MB RAM. Now, It is running with
512 MB RAM. But, It is still slow. No progress has been achived. Some users
say
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Hi,
I am still runnig Redhat 9 box with sendmail and squid. It is quite
slow. It has only 128 MB RAM. So I upgraded it to 512 MB RAM. Now, It is
running with 512 MB RAM. But, It is still slow. No progress has been
achived. Some users say it is slower than before. Ac
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
I am still runnig Redhat 9 box with sendmail and squid. It is quite
slow.
Given that this is the CentOS mailing list, the appropriate suggestion
is that you install CentOS 5. Red Hat Linux 9.0 is ancient history by now.
_
Hi,
I am still runnig Redhat 9 box with sendmail and squid. It is quite slow. It
has only 128 MB RAM. So I upgraded it to 512 MB RAM. Now, It is running with
512 MB RAM. But, It is still slow. No progress has been achived. Some users
say it is slower than before. Actually, I also have noticed it
Am Mittwoch, den 25.07.2007, 09:05 +0200 schrieb Adriatik Allamani:
> Thanks a lot for the help.
>
> Actually I am interested in using CentOS as Server for the AD and not to
> join the CentOS to AD.
I'm really sorry to tell you, but CentOS is unable to serve something
like AD. The only thing that
Thanks a lot for the help.
Actually I am interested in using CentOS as Server for the AD and not to
join the CentOS to AD.
I need a help how to configure the centOS 5 as AD server for win2k and
winXP users.
Regards
Adriatik
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 23:35 -0500, Paul wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-24 at
58 matches
Mail list logo
