[Cegcc-devel] Doc link which is current?

2010-12-20 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello, I was added as a member to cegcc project, thanks Danny! Going to start some clean up work, and first question I have is about project docs. There appears to be 2 sets: 1. http://cegcc.sourceforge.net/documentation.html - This is what linked by "Development" on cegcc.sf.net 2. http://cegcc.

[Cegcc-devel] RFC: Trac migration? was: Re: Doc link which is current?

2010-12-20 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello, On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:24:27 +0200 Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >[] (should be linked from wiki)? On a second thought: I already started some wiki cleanup, but: sf.net's native tracker is apparently not up to the day. But there's Trac hosted app, and Trac hopefully is well-known and easy on

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Doc link which is current?

2010-12-20 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Hello, > > I was added as a member to cegcc project, thanks Danny! Going to start > some clean up work, and first question I have is about project docs. > There appears to be 2 sets: > > 1. http://cegcc.sourceforge.net/documentation.html - This is wh

Re: [Cegcc-devel] RFC: Trac migration? was: Re: Doc link which is current?

2010-12-20 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:24:27 +0200 > Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > >> [] (should be linked from wiki)? > > On a second thought: > > I already started some wiki cleanup, but: sf.net's native tracker is > apparently not up to the day. But there'