On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 14:04 -0500, Pablo Rogina wrote:
> Danny,
>
> you recently added VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_CE to w32api/include/winnt.h
> (because of building Roadmap).
>
> As per
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms886768.aspx
> it seems that the header file is winbase.h instead.
Yes, b
A Saturday 19 April 2008 04:38:37, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > The canonical form to match our toolchains should be
> > arm*-*-mingw32ce* and arm*-*-cegcc*, which always covers the
> > old and the new forms.
>
> We use *-*-cegcc. Should I modify the patch so that the prefix if 'arm',
> and should I p
A Friday 11 April 2008 18:57:44, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Danny Backx wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 09:19 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
> >> I've succeeded in compiling (some parts of) cegcc with msys.
> >>
> >> For that, i needed to do some hack and modifications. If some people
A Wednesday 12 March 2008 09:13:38, Vincent Torri wrote:
> so it seems that there are some problems for cegcc tools to correctly deal
> with the microsoft import lib.
>
> Is it normal ?
>
It is a bug.
> I know that the mingw (desktop) devs provide a static lib for ddraw (and
> direct3d and openg
Hey,
We use *-*-cegcc. Should I modify the patch so that the prefix if 'arm',
and should I put a star at the end ? The star seems useless to me
Notice that cygwin* and mingw* also have a star. The star enables things
as i586-mingw32msvc (as ubuntu has, probably debian too). It enables
thi
