On 20/06/07, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically all you need to do is
> ftp upload.sf.net
> cd /incoming
> put your-file
> bye
OK!
I decided at the last minute to mimic your packages so cegcc and
mingw32ce both get their own package. Looks like you'
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 12:42 +0200, Carsten Sørensen wrote:
> I decided at the last minute to mimic your packages so cegcc and
> mingw32ce both get their own package. Looks like you're stripping
> executables so I did that as well in my build script, which instantly
> halved the size of the packages
On 20/06/07, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 12:42 +0200, Carsten Sørensen wrote:
> > I've uploaded four files in /incoming for OSX:
>
> I guess we should now edit the web site and docs, because we have one
> more host platform than we used to have. How should I descr
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 19:29 +0200, Carsten Sørensen wrote:
> On 20/06/07, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 12:42 +0200, Carsten Sørensen wrote:
> > > I've uploaded four files in /incoming for OSX:
> >
> > I guess we should now edit the web site and docs, because we h
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 22:41 -0600, Ximsce wrote:
> The exception handling doesn't seem to be working, I'm compiling from
> subversion at the moment (takes 2 hours on my sadly out-dated computer).
> What version would you say is in the repository?
I just committed my cegcc exception handler. Le
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 19:52 -0600, Ximsce wrote:
> Pedro Alves wrote:
> > You didn't NULL terminate the argument list:
> > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/95399/functions/exec.html
> >
> > "The argument argv is an array of character pointers to
> > null-terminated strings. The application
On 20/06/07, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's just that I'm not familiar with OSX. You provided two types of
> binaries (x86 and PowerPC). I guess I should probably change our texts
> where they say e.g.
>
> CeGCC is a cross-development environment for creating Windows CE
>
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 21:47 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> > Even though the comments about the argv argument are accurate, this may
> > not be the right reference to quote from.
> >
> > I've been looking for reference material on MSDN. Here's one :
> > http://msdn2.microsoft.co
Danny Backx wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 19:52 -0600, Ximsce wrote:
>> Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> You didn't NULL terminate the argument list:
>>> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/95399/functions/exec.html
>>>
>>> "The argument argv is an array of character pointers to
>>> null-terminated stri
Carsten Sørensen wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
>> It's just that I'm not familiar with OSX. You provided two types of
>> binaries (x86 and PowerPC). I guess I should probably change our texts
>> where they say e.g.
>>
>> CeGCC is a cross-development environment for creating Windows CE
>>
Danny Backx wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 21:47 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Danny Backx wrote:
>>> Even though the comments about the argv argument are accurate, this may
>>> not be the right reference to quote from.
>>>
>>> I've been looking for reference material on MSDN. Here's one :
>>> http
On 20/06/07, Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To me "can run", implies that it can't run on anything else.
I don't agree, these are just the platforms which have been verified to work.
> What do you think of something along the lines of, :
However - your suggestion is much better. It's
Pedro Alves wrote:
> So to resume what Danny was saying, exec replaces, spawn doesn't.
Yeah, I hadn't taken a close enough look at the exec documentation. If
you hadn't noticed,
it's been a while since I coded in C. For the moment I've spliced my
code into the lame
frontend directly, thus remo
13 matches
Mail list logo
