On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 19:01 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> The exception c++ model that both mingw32ce and cegcc use is the sjlj model.
> It is similar with the SEH model on x86. It certainly works.
>
> SEH is an OS thing, so it always works, but it happens that registering
> handlers manually is mu
On 6/7/07, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the message below, Iris did his or her best to figure out which
> version of our software was causing trouble.
>
> But we don't offer much.
>
> One thing for me to do is add a document that describes how to tell us
> which version you have.
>
>
Danny Backx escreveu:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 16:58 -0700, stan lee wrote:
>> Sorry i forgot to mention i was building for
>> mingw32ce. I was also wondering about the filesize.
>> Why do i get a 1MB binary?
>
Probably a lot of debug info there. Did you try stripping the
binary? Debug info is
Danny Backx wrote:
> DialogBoxParamW is a macro that calls DialogBoxIndirectParamW.
>
> This is defined in but only if the symbol _WIN32_WCE is
> defined.
>
> So you may have to add -D_WIN32_WCE to your compile command.
>
That happened on 2006-11-02. Any release before that doesn't have it.
(Please guys, don't top post.)
Just a follow up. I noticed that if i pass a
>>> value
by reference in the time(), the number of seconds
>>> gets
correctly saved in it.
Should be fixed in svn as of revision 932.
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
--
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 15:08 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > Pedro, the version number on these things is not something we've argued
> > about. Any objection to just copying the stuff currently on my personal
> > site to SF ?
> >
>
> No, of course not. I thought they where at SF already :)
No, bec
On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:27:14 +0100
Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> > DialogBoxParamW is a macro that calls DialogBoxIndirectParamW.
According to winuser.h, line 3470,
#define DialogBoxW(i,t,p,f) DialogBoxParamW(i,t,p,f,0),
which is later (li
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:57 +0400, Iris wrote:
> Global solution for me, is to upgrade cegcc RPM, right?
>
> BTW, which one is better to grab from
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=173455?
There should be a 0.14 version in a couple of minutes.
Danny
--
Dann
Danny Backx wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 15:08 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > Pedro, the version number on these things is not something we've argued
> > > about. Any objection to just copying the stuff currently on my personal
> > > site to SF ?
> > >
> >
> > No, of course not. I thought they
Hi Guys
Just need a lil help getting the basics of cpp working with cegcc or
mingw32ce. If I try and compile a standard cpp prog such as
#include
using namespace std;
int main(void) {
cout << "test" << endl;
}
then I try compiling like
arm-wince-cegcc-gcc -o test.exe test.cpp
I get the fol
10 matches
Mail list logo
