On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I think it's important, so to insulate the runtimes from
> the unstableness of the compilers. I'm not even sure nowadays
> what gcc people are using. 4.1, or 4.4? That way people
> could update the runtimes while using other compilers more
> easily, e
On Friday 11 December 2009 16:14:05, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:39 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > This makes me wonder if it's about time we split
> > runtime (mingw/w32api) releases from compiler releases. Opinions
> > on that?
>
> Looks like a "nice to have" item.
I think it'
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:39 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> This makes me wonder if it's about time we split
> runtime (mingw/w32api) releases from compiler releases. Opinions
> on that?
Looks like a "nice to have" item.
There are a couple of issues with higher rating that I've not been able
to look