Danny Backx wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 15:08 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > Pedro, the version number on these things is not something we've argued
> > > about. Any objection to just copying the stuff currently on my personal
> > > site to SF ?
> > >
> >
> > No, of course not. I thought they
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 15:08 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > Pedro, the version number on these things is not something we've argued
> > about. Any objection to just copying the stuff currently on my personal
> > site to SF ?
> >
>
> No, of course not. I thought they where at SF already :)
No, bec
(Please guys, don't top post.)
Just a follow up. I noticed that if i pass a
>>> value
by reference in the time(), the number of seconds
>>> gets
correctly saved in it.
Should be fixed in svn as of revision 932.
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
--
Danny Backx escreveu:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 16:58 -0700, stan lee wrote:
>> Sorry i forgot to mention i was building for
>> mingw32ce. I was also wondering about the filesize.
>> Why do i get a 1MB binary?
>
Probably a lot of debug info there. Did you try stripping the
binary? Debug info is
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 16:58 -0700, stan lee wrote:
> Sorry i forgot to mention i was building for
> mingw32ce. I was also wondering about the filesize.
> Why do i get a 1MB binary?
Because cegcc comes with more DLLs than mingw32ce. (Edited output of a
find command below.)
543232 Jun 7 21:58 /op
Hi Danny,
Sorry i forgot to mention i was building for
mingw32ce. I was also wondering about the filesize.
Why do i get a 1MB binary? I am using
cegcc-mingw32ce-0.14-1.i586.rpm which I got from your
site (the one in sourceforge is outdated and I couldnt
properly build cegcc from source).
Cheers
You fail to mention which compiler you use.
The source below works fine for me without change with arm-wince-cegcc-g
++, but fails (always displays 0) when using arm-wince-mingw32ce-g++ .
Also in the latter case, the executable is 1MB. The cegcc executable is
only 55K.
Danny
On Wed, 200
Hi,
Just a follow up. I noticed that if i pass a value
by reference in the time(), the number of seconds gets
correctly saved in it.
Cheers,
Stan
--- stan lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the time function still incomplete? The value I
> always get is zero even though the system
Hi,
Is the time function still incomplete? The value I
always get is zero even though the system time in my
device is set correctly.
Here is my simple program that converts the value
returned by time to widechar and prints it in a
messagebox:
#include
#include
int WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance,
