On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 13:18 +0200, Vincent R. wrote:
> Forget my previous patch it doesn't work ...
When someone else is doing the work, I can be very patient :-)
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
Forget my previous patch it doesn't work ...
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerr
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:26:52 +0100, Dave Korn
wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
>
>> Seriously : I've not looked into objc at all. Does it have porting
>> issues like the rest of gcc/g++/libg++ or does it sit quietly on top of
>> gcc ?
>
> Generally speaking, it "just works": if C works, ObjC works,
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:26:52 +0100, Dave Korn
wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
>
>> Seriously : I've not looked into objc at all. Does it have porting
>> issues like the rest of gcc/g++/libg++ or does it sit quietly on top of
>> gcc ?
>
> Generally speaking, it "just works": if C works, ObjC works,
Danny Backx wrote:
> Seriously : I've not looked into objc at all. Does it have porting
> issues like the rest of gcc/g++/libg++ or does it sit quietly on top of
> gcc ?
Generally speaking, it "just works": if C works, ObjC works, and if C++
works, Obj-C++ works. I've never had to patch either
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 14:55 +0200, Vincent R. wrote:
> Why do you think objective-C doesn't interest anyone on windows mobile ?
> Actually I would like to test it but you deleted objc folders from
> gcc-4...
Actually it's a tricky situation.
When I put the whole gcc distro under src/ people will
Hi,
Why do you think objective-C doesn't interest anyone on windows mobile ?
Actually I would like to test it but you deleted objc folders from
gcc-4...
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF,
