On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 18:55 +0200, Mosfet wrote:
> What I wanted to say in my last message was the fact I thought it would be
> more logical to add some missing include and implement them instead of
> adding #ifndef _MINGW32CE everywhere.
[..]
> I was just saying that if you provide a minimal imple
What I wanted to say in my last message was the fact I thought it would be
more logical to add some missing include and implement them instead of
adding #ifndef _MINGW32CE everywhere.
Let's examine my case : today I need to generate a D compiler, so if I am
listening to you it means I will h
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 13:56 +0200, Mosfet wrote:
> I would like to discuss about mingw32ce and the way it's implemented.
[..]
> I know that errno.h, signal.h and ... are not part of the original windows
> CE platform but I think it would be better to provide these headers and to
> implement missing
Hi,
I would like to discuss about mingw32ce and the way it's implemented.
>From what I understand you comment missing include files on the windows CE
platform like this :
/* Define to 1 if you have the header file. */
#undef HAVE_ERRNO_H
or like that
#if _GLIBCXX_HAVE_ERRNO_H
#in
