On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 23:43 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Thursday 18 September 2008 07:23:43, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> > about gdb, would it be posible that someone put in the wiki a small
> > tutorial about using gdb with a wince device ?
>
I just want to share that gdb 6.8 is *much* better t
On Thursday 18 September 2008 07:23:43, Vincent Torri wrote:
> about gdb, would it be posible that someone put in the wiki a small
> tutorial about using gdb with a wince device ?
Definitily. I've been saying for years that we should move into
a mindset of documenting things in the wiki. I'm a
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:17:59, Danny Backx wrote:
>> One of the last messages I found from you about gdb said you still had
>> some work that wasn't committed. I don't know what it was about. This
>> made me believe it wasn't entirely done, but yo
Sorry, ENOPATCH,
(that's against current GDB head, but should be easy to
adjust to 6.8 if it doesn't apply)
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:22:10, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Sorry for the delay,
>
> On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:19:07, Danny Backx wrote:
> > When using the gdb we now have i cegcc sv
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:17:59, Danny Backx wrote:
> One of the last messages I found from you about gdb said you still had
> some work that wasn't committed. I don't know what it was about. This
> made me believe it wasn't entirely done, but your reply now indicates
> that it is. Are there s
Sorry for the delay,
On Sunday 07 September 2008 07:19:07, Danny Backx wrote:
> When using the gdb we now have i cegcc svn, I used the automatic file
> transfer (over synce) a lot. Is that possible with this version of gdb
> too ?
Not automatically, no, sorry. gdbserver doesn't use RAPI at all.
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 04:14 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Saturday 06 September 2008 08:52:24, Danny Backx wrote:
> > 1. rcp prog.exe ipaq:/temp
> > 2. rsh ipaq /temp/gdbserver.exe : /temp/prog.exe
> > 3. gdb prog.exe
> >target remote ipaq:
>
> Try this instead:
>
> gdbserver.exe --m
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 04:11 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Thursday 04 September 2008 19:47:09, Danny Backx wrote:
>
> > After that, I'd like opinions about removing the gdb source tree from
> > our svn (but keeping gdb in binary distributions).
>
> Yay! Please do remove it.
>
> I've contribute
On Saturday 06 September 2008 08:52:24, Danny Backx wrote:
> 1. rcp prog.exe ipaq:/temp
> 2. rsh ipaq /temp/gdbserver.exe : /temp/prog.exe
> 3. gdb prog.exe
> target remote ipaq:
Try this instead:
gdbserver.exe --multi :
gdb prog.exe
(gdb) set remote exec-file /temp/prog.exe
(gdb
On Thursday 04 September 2008 19:47:09, Danny Backx wrote:
> After that, I'd like opinions about removing the gdb source tree from
> our svn (but keeping gdb in binary distributions).
Yay! Please do remove it.
I've contributed the proper gdb and gdbserver ports upstream for well over
a year no
I've uploaded it.
https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=173455&package_id=198682&release_id=624479
This contains the stuff generated by the gdb build, and includes the
gdbserver.exe which needs to be put on your PDA.
Use like this :
1. rcp prog.exe ipaq:/temp
2. rsh ipaq /temp/
Would someone be interested in a separate binary distribution of this
stuff to play with ?
I'd like confirmation that it works.
After that, I'd like opinions about removing the gdb source tree from
our svn (but keeping gdb in binary distributions).
Danny
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 20:29 +020
Hi,
Pedro always referred to gdbserver, I never got a chance to play with
that. My new iPAQ urged me to try it, because I don't have synce to
provide a connection to it. (I don't feel like connecting it via the USB
cable - the wireless connection should do the trick.)
Anyway, I took gdb 6.8 from
13 matches
Mail list logo
