Thanks to everyone for your advice.
I had not yet upgraded to Cygwin 1.7 - when I first ran the setup
program, it popped up a warning about the changes in 1.7, so I went to
look at the website...and never went back and actually installed the
upgrade!
So I installed the upgrade, and got a diffe
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:02:57 +0100, Vincent Richomme
wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:23:55 -0800 (PST), İsmail "cartman" Dönmez
> wrote:
>> Sean Healy wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I found no way to search the archive to see if someone else has
> reported
>>> a similar error, so I'm posting it
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:23:55 -0800 (PST), İsmail "cartman" Dönmez
wrote:
> Sean Healy wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I found no way to search the archive to see if someone else has
reported
>> a similar error, so I'm posting it to the list. gcc doesn't seem to be
>> working. When I run the program,
Sean Healy wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I found no way to search the archive to see if someone else has reported
> a similar error, so I'm posting it to the list. gcc doesn't seem to be
> working. When I run the program, it exits with no error message - no
> message of any kind, in fact - but no ou
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:08:34 +0100, Sean Healy
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found no way to search the archive to see if someone else has reported
> a similar error, so I'm posting it to the list. gcc doesn't seem to be
> working. When I run the program, it exits with no error message - no
> message
On 23/01/2010 16:08, Sean Healy wrote:
> [ ... ] gcc doesn't seem to be
> working. When I run the program, it exits with no error message - no
> message of any kind, in fact - but no output file is produced. So I get
> no output and no error message. [ ... ]
On Cygwin, this is a typical symp
Hello,
I found no way to search the archive to see if someone else has reported
a similar error, so I'm posting it to the list. gcc doesn't seem to be
working. When I run the program, it exits with no error message - no
message of any kind, in fact - but no output file is produced. So I get
no