On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 09:24 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:17 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> > 1) Put section .edata and .idata inside .rdata
> > 2) Put .bss data inside .data instead of emitting a .bss section
> > 3) Fix IAT because value is NULL
> > 4) Fix Pointer To Symbol Tabl
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:17 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> 1) Put section .edata and .idata inside .rdata
> 2) Put .bss data inside .data instead of emitting a .bss section
> 3) Fix IAT because value is NULL
> 4) Fix Pointer To Symbol Table because value is NULL
As I wrote earlier, #3 is changed but t
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 14:16 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> Does anyone know of a way to debug these things ? Adding an echo
> statement only resulted in a syntax error.
I still want to know how to debug linker scripts !
But the attached patch (one of Kais patches but ported from pep.sc to
pe.sc) cau
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 19:14 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> But still the IAT remains NULL. I suspect that the code that Kai also
> patched in ld/emultempl/pep.em and scripttempl/armcoff.sc and
> scripttempl/pep.sc might be related.
>
> Can anyone tell me how to interpret the ld scripts ? I haven't th
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 20:08 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 19:50 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> > >> I have also applied another patch that I think is supposed to fill IAT
> > >> value and I have recompiled binutils but when I clean/recompile my
> > sample
> > >> application I canno
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:03:41 +, Dave Korn
wrote:
> Vincent R. wrote:
>
>>> So Dave, question coundn't we manually change .idata section
>>> characteristics for instance instead of disabling auto-import ?
>>
>>
>> Ok I just tried to modify .idata section characteristics by removing
>> write
Danny Backx wrote:
> I would
> have expected it to report that the symbol I want to look up isn't
> present, because objdump says it has no symbols, but it does find it.
"objdump -t" dumps only the COFF symbol table, that is .obj-file-style
symbols, debug symbols, etc.; what you are looking at
Vincent R. wrote:
>> So Dave, question coundn't we manually change .idata section
>> characteristics for instance instead of disabling auto-import ?
>
>
> Ok I just tried to modify .idata section characteristics by removing write
> attributes and of course now I don't even have an error messag
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 21:31 +0100, Danny Backx wrote:
> I've tested with my testapi application (see tools/dll) .
>
> On a DLL created with cegcc, the LoadLibrary system call fails with
> error ERROR_BAD_EXE_FORMAT (value 193).
>
> On a DLL created with MSVC by Vincent, LoadLibrary does succeed.
I've tested with my testapi application (see tools/dll) .
On a DLL created with cegcc, the LoadLibrary system call fails with
error ERROR_BAD_EXE_FORMAT (value 193).
On a DLL created with MSVC by Vincent, LoadLibrary does succeed. I would
have expected it to report that the symbol I want to look
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 23:05 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:59:20 +0100, Danny Backx
> wrote:
> >> You can find the sample code I am using here : www [DO_T] smartmobili
> >> [D.OT] com/Downloads/cegcc-bug-testDLL.zip
> >> It's commented and very simple.
> >
> > Yes, I've been us
Vincent R. wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:59:20 +0100, Danny Backx
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 14:10 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
>>> I have been fired (the company I was working for doesn't have money
>>> anymore) so I have some time to answer you ;-)
>> Auch. Sorry to see that.
Welcome t
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:59:20 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 14:10 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
>> I have been fired (the company I was working for doesn't have money
>> anymore) so I have some time to answer you ;-)
>
> Auch. Sorry to see that.
>
>> Microsoft changed the way memo
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 23:05 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> Danny I think kai sent you some patch he did some time ago when I first
> asked him
> to help me with cegcc.
> Maybe we could start from this, this is the only option I see.
> Could you please the patch you have because I lost them ?
Forwarded
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 14:10 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> I have been fired (the company I was working for doesn't have money
> anymore) so I have some time to answer you ;-)
Auch. Sorry to see that.
> Microsoft changed the way memory was managed on wince > 4.2 and now from
> what I read
> PE secti
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 17:17 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> Basically from what I understand it consists in doing the following
> modifications :
>
> 1) Put section .edata and .idata inside .rdata
> 2) Put .bss data inside .data instead of emitting a .bss section
> 3) Fix IAT because value is NULL
> 4)
-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Pedro Alves ;
Kai Tietz ; Dave Korn
Subject: [Cegcc-devel] fix cegcc PE bug
Hi,
Now that binutils have been updated to latest version and
normally cegcc is using pseudo-reloc v2 maybe it's time to try to fix
the most annoying bug ie binary generated with
Hi,
Now that binutils have been updated to latest version and
normally cegcc is using pseudo-reloc v2 maybe it's time to try to fix
the most annoying bug ie binary generated with cegcc cannot be loaded on
windows
ce platforms without some tricks.
What I can do to help is very limited but if some
18 matches
Mail list logo
