Re: [Cegcc-devel] cegcc 4.2.4

2008-07-21 Thread forumer
Personnaly I would prefer a 4.3.0 but I didn't manage to get it compiled so I tried to report modifications on a 4.2.4 because I thought it would be easier. Besides D language is not officially supported on a 4.3 that's why I choose a 4.2. On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:28:02 +0200, Danny Backx <[EM

Re: [Cegcc-devel] cegcc 4.2.4

2008-07-20 Thread Danny Backx
Are you saying we should upgrade cegcc to gcc 4.2.4, not 4.3.0 ? Pedro had picked up after my initial attempts to work on 4.3.0, and he said he had it working, but then he never had the time to finish all this. Pedro, can you comment ? Danny On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 13:50 +0200, [EMAIL PR

[Cegcc-devel] cegcc 4.2.4

2008-07-18 Thread forumer
Hi, I am working on generating a D compiler for a wince platforms and so I started from cegcc/mingw32ce. The problem I have encounter is a bad insn when compiling and I had to add a -fno-sibling-calls switch. After some research I found a bug in gcc 4.1.0 when optimizing so I have decided to repor