On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 23:23 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 16:08 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> >>Please move the attribute implementation into either arm.c, or better
> >> yet, reuse the SUBTARGET_ATTRIBUTE_TABLE mechanism already implemented
> >> for the
Danny Backx wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 16:08 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>Please move the attribute implementation into either arm.c, or better
>> yet, reuse the SUBTARGET_ATTRIBUTE_TABLE mechanism already implemented
>> for the "selectany" attribute. Since this is a target specific
>> attr
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 16:08 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>Please move the attribute implementation into either arm.c, or better
> yet, reuse the SUBTARGET_ATTRIBUTE_TABLE mechanism already implemented
> for the "selectany" attribute. Since this is a target specific
> attribute it has no place in
Danny Backx escreveu:
> On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 16:08 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Danny Backx wrote:
>>> Actually I did several modifications to try to follow the GNU coding
>>> standards. That is what you're referring to, isn't it?
>>>
>>> Please tell me where exactly do I not follow one now ? I'll
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 16:08 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> >
> > Actually I did several modifications to try to follow the GNU coding
> > standards. That is what you're referring to, isn't it?
> >
> > Please tell me where exactly do I not follow one now ? I'll fix.
> >
>
> Bum
Danny Backx wrote:
>
> Actually I did several modifications to try to follow the GNU coding
> standards. That is what you're referring to, isn't it?
>
> Please tell me where exactly do I not follow one now ? I'll fix.
>
Bummer, this really makes me sound a nitpicker. I would have preferred
you
Hi Pedro and Danny,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cegcc-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny Backx
> Sent: zondag 5 augustus 2007 13:45
> To: Pedro Alves
> Cc: CeGCC Development List
> Subject: Re: [Cegcc-devel] WinCE Exception ha
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 12:00 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
>
> > FYI I've just committed the code (changed as Pedro suggested).
> >
>
> Great. But, you've missed bullet 1. I guess you have to go
> through the upstream submission process to see the value of doing
> it early... s
Danny Backx wrote:
> FYI I've just committed the code (changed as Pedro suggested).
>
Great. But, you've missed bullet 1. I guess you have to go
through the upstream submission process to see the value of doing
it early... sigh...
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 08:08 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 01:25 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > Danny Backx wrote:
> > > I've been digging in gcc internals and succeeded in implementing stuff
> > > that allows us to write code such as
> > > int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > >
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 01:25 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Danny Backx wrote:
> > I've been digging in gcc internals and succeeded in implementing stuff
> > that allows us to write code such as
> > int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > __attribute__((__exception_handler__(handler)));
>
Danny Backx wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I've been digging in gcc internals and succeeded in implementing stuff
> that allows us to write code such as
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> __attribute__((__exception_handler__(handler)));
> to indicate that handler is the exception handler
Guys,
I've been digging in gcc internals and succeeded in implementing stuff
that allows us to write code such as
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
__attribute__((__exception_handler__(handler)));
to indicate that handler is the exception handler for function main.
The patc
13 matches
Mail list logo
