Vincent R. wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:09:26 +0100, Dave Korn
> wrote:
>> Dave Korn wrote:
>>> Vincent R. wrote:
>>>
For instance I wanted to test Dw2 exception on wince platform and from
what I know
normally you only need to call configure with --with-dwarf2 and it
> will
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:09:26 +0100, Dave Korn
wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>> Vincent R. wrote:
>>
>>> For instance I wanted to test Dw2 exception on wince platform and from
>>> what I know
>>> normally you only need to call configure with --with-dwarf2 and it
will
>>> define DWARF2_DEBUGGING_INFO b
Dave Korn wrote:
> Vincent R. wrote:
>
>> For instance I wanted to test Dw2 exception on wince platform and from
>> what I know
>> normally you only need to call configure with --with-dwarf2 and it will
>> define DWARF2_DEBUGGING_INFO but it doesn't work on cegcc.
>
> Nope, --with-dwarf2 sets t
Vincent R. wrote:
> For instance I wanted to test Dw2 exception on wince platform and from
> what I know
> normally you only need to call configure with --with-dwarf2 and it will
> define DWARF2_DEBUGGING_INFO but it doesn't work on cegcc.
Nope, --with-dwarf2 sets the default debugging info for
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 12:12 +0200, Vincent R. wrote:
> Another thing on the TODO list is to work a bit more on cegcc patches
> and especially because I think it's a bit too far from cygwin/mingw.
> For instance I wanted to test Dw2 exception on wince platform and from
> what I know
> normally you o
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:17:22 +0200 (CEST), Vincent Torri
wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Vincent R. wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:15:05 +0200, Danny Backx
>> wrote:
>>> Trying to assemble a list of things to do. Please help me make it
>>> sensible.
>>>
>>> Also, volunteers are welcome to kick
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Vincent R. wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:15:05 +0200, Danny Backx
> wrote:
>> Trying to assemble a list of things to do. Please help me make it
>> sensible.
>>
>> Also, volunteers are welcome to kick in ;-)
>>
>> Note that making gcc 4.4 stable is not on this list, I see
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:15:05 +0200, Danny Backx
wrote:
> Trying to assemble a list of things to do. Please help me make it
> sensible.
>
> Also, volunteers are welcome to kick in ;-)
>
> Note that making gcc 4.4 stable is not on this list, I see no complaints
> so the new release must work. Righ
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 20:15 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> Trying to assemble a list of things to do. Please help me make it
> sensible.
>
> Also, volunteers are welcome to kick in ;-)
>
> Note that making gcc 4.4 stable is not on this list, I see no complaints
> so the new release must work. Right
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 23:51 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Danny Backx wrote:
> > Trying to assemble a list of things to do. Please help me make it
> > sensible.
> >
> > Also, volunteers are welcome to kick in ;-)
> >
> > Note that making gcc 4.4 stable is not on this list, I se
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Danny Backx wrote:
> Trying to assemble a list of things to do. Please help me make it
> sensible.
>
> Also, volunteers are welcome to kick in ;-)
>
> Note that making gcc 4.4 stable is not on this list, I see no complaints
> so the new release must work. Right ?
>
> 7. Webs
Trying to assemble a list of things to do. Please help me make it
sensible.
Also, volunteers are welcome to kick in ;-)
Note that making gcc 4.4 stable is not on this list, I see no complaints
so the new release must work. Right ?
1. I'm slowly working on gdb improvements for accepting dos style
12 matches
Mail list logo
