Even though they point to .bin files, all 3 files are legit diffs. Guess
that's the way they are stored on that gmane.org site..?
On Jan 15, 2008 3:22 PM, cal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The links to the 'diffs' on
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.cegcc.devel/360 have a .bin
> exten
The links to the 'diffs' on
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.cegcc.devel/360 have a .bin
extension, which smells fishy to me.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual S
Hi All,
I am trying to compile SDL library using mingw32ce compiler. I followed
the instruction at the following link
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.cegcc.devel/360
and could able to compile some how after applying patches to wingdi.h,
winuser.h and shellapi.h. But linker fail
cal wrote:
> Re:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200703291652.38437.jwalt%40garni.ch&forum_name=cegcc-devel
> I'm attempting to apply the described patches to build the latest version of
> SDL. Most of it appears to work, except building configure from the revised
> c
Re:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200703291652.38437.jwalt%40garni.ch&forum_name=cegcc-devel
I'm attempting to apply the described patches to build the latest version of
SDL. Most of it appears to work, except building configure from the revised
configure.in. this br
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Cegcc-devel mailing l
Jörg Walter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just managed to compile SDL for Windows CE using the "mingw32ce"
> configuration of http://cegcc.sourceforge.net. Test programs work as expected
> (except for those using signals -- no POSIX on mingw32ce), and I didn't yet
> encounter any problem.
>
>
This is g
