Oh gosh, time flies, sorry about that.
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 20:25:36, Danny Backx wrote:
> Apologies for not replying sooner. Busy busy.
>
> On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 05:42 -0700, Eric House wrote:
> > I'm filing an "Intent to Package" which wants to know:
> >
> > * Version? Is there a more re
Apologies for not replying sooner. Busy busy.
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 05:42 -0700, Eric House wrote:
> I'm filing an "Intent to Package" which wants to know:
>
> * Version? Is there a more recent tarball than 0.51.0 that has a version
> number associated? I guess I'm looking for something like a
I'm filing an "Intent to Package" which wants to know:
* Version? Is there a more recent tarball than 0.51.0 that has a version
number associated? I guess I'm looking for something like a "stable"
snapshot to start with -- if there is such a thing. Worst case I guess
I pull the trunk and u
