Re: [Cegcc-devel] Patches for cegcc on osx-powerpc (again, now cleaner)

2009-04-17 Thread Danny Backx
I've asked about the STACKSIZE issue on the binutils mailing list. Danny On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 01:32 +0200, Ismail Khatib wrote: > Am 16.04.2009 um 19:52 schrieb Danny Backx: > > I have questions about your submissions. With some answers, I can > > commit > > stuff to the SVN. > > > > W

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Patches for cegcc on osx-powerpc (again, now cleaner)

2009-04-17 Thread Ismail Khatib
Am 16.04.2009 um 19:52 schrieb Danny Backx: > I have questions about your submissions. With some answers, I can > commit > stuff to the SVN. > > Would it work on your target if we said something like > #ifdef __DARWIN_UNIX03 > %token NAME LIBRARY DESCRIPTION LEOPARD_STACKSIZE > %token HEAPSIZE C

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Patches for cegcc on osx-powerpc (again, now cleaner)

2009-04-16 Thread Danny Backx
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 23:33 +0200, Ismail Khatib wrote: > First of all sorry for the form of my last email, I was in a kind of > strange mood that day. Don't worry about it. But a patch with comment is infinitely better than one without :-) I have questions about your submissions. With some answe

[Cegcc-devel] Patches for cegcc on osx-powerpc (again, now cleaner)

2009-04-15 Thread Ismail Khatib
Hi there! First of all sorry for the form of my last email, I was in a kind of strange mood that day. I just realized that I sent an uncommented patch as an attachment in a html-mail to this list without telling what it does and why I needed to patch cegcc (my bad). :( So, again here it