Re: [Cegcc-devel] Fix struct BY_HANDLE_FILE_INFORMATION.

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Pedro Alves wrote: > I think it's important, so to insulate the runtimes from > the unstableness of the compilers. I'm not even sure nowadays > what gcc people are using. 4.1, or 4.4? That way people > could update the runtimes while using other compilers more > easily, e

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Fix struct BY_HANDLE_FILE_INFORMATION.

On Friday 11 December 2009 16:14:05, Danny Backx wrote: > On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:39 +, Pedro Alves wrote: > > This makes me wonder if it's about time we split > > runtime (mingw/w32api) releases from compiler releases. Opinions > > on that? > > Looks like a "nice to have" item. I think it'

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Fix struct BY_HANDLE_FILE_INFORMATION.

On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:39 +, Pedro Alves wrote: > This makes me wonder if it's about time we split > runtime (mingw/w32api) releases from compiler releases. Opinions > on that? Looks like a "nice to have" item. There are a couple of issues with higher rating that I've not been able to look

[Cegcc-devel] Fix struct BY_HANDLE_FILE_INFORMATION.

A collegue found out the hard way that GetFileInformationByHandle was stomping the stack. Turns out that struct BY_HANDLE_FILE_INFORMATION was missing a field on CE . I've applied this patch to fix this. 2009-12-10 Pedro Alves *