Sorry for the last mail. I replied to "one mail too far" in the mailbox.
Jacek.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration
Hi,
Joanna says that it would be nice if all "experimental data" pictures were
looking alike. We volunteer to prepare them (I've already sent you
Fig.1 and Fig.2). What we need are the "selections" for the Fig.9 - Joanna
says she no longer has them, maybe you have them (plus selections for
Fig.3, o
> to tell it "Don't look in \SYSTEM or \WIN32 or whatever the win32
> standard DLL places are, but look _here_ in stead". And then, at
> _here_, I would have a copy of the system directory from my Windows
> Mobile device. This would make the output of Dependency Walker 100%
> correct, in stead of
Now that we're doing slightly-off-topic discussions anyway, let me
ask a question I have:
On 24-Oct-2007, at 18:52 , Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
I've also seen this situation several times. To find out what was
going
wrong I've used a tool called 'dependency walker'. With this
program you
c
> It was an honest question, not a go away ticket.
Sorry, my answer was also not supposed to mean "go away" to you.
It simply intended to say that there is no way to get "support".
Best regards,
Jacek.
-
This SF.net email is
> Adding a bit to Danny's excelent advise:
>
> More preciselly, you'll probably find out that the executable is
> trying to import
> function X from dll Y and that function doesn't exist in the dll - most
> probably from coredll.dll.
>
Oh, and in that case, one way to get around it, is to somehow
> On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:33 +0200, Jacek M. Holeczek wrote:
> > I use an "unblocked" PNA running "Windows CE 5.0 Core".
> > Usually, I can use most of the existing Pocket PC software (in the
> > beginning it required me to "add" some "compatibility" dll libraries).
It's not just about the dlls,
Hi,
Op woensdag 24-10-2007 om 18:44 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Danny
Backx:
> > There is a utility which I would like to use (very much), but whenever I
> > try to run it, I get "File is not a valid Windows CE application".
> I've seen this type of message myself from applications compiled with
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:33 +0200, Jacek M. Holeczek wrote:
> I apologize for this question, as it is not really related to cegcc.
> However, I see no better place to ask it, as I believe there are experts
> here, who know how the PPC executable looks inside.
>
> I use an "unblocked" PNA running "
> Forget it.
It was an honest question, not a go away ticket.
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configura
> Have you tried contacting the author of the application?
Forget it.
Jacek.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration
Jacek M. Holeczek wrote:
> There is a utility which I would like to use (very much), but whenever I
> try to run it, I get "File is not a valid Windows CE application".
Have you tried contacting the author of the application?
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
-
Hi,
I apologize for this question, as it is not really related to cegcc.
However, I see no better place to ask it, as I believe there are experts
here, who know how the PPC executable looks inside.
I use an "unblocked" PNA running "Windows CE 5.0 Core".
Usually, I can use most of the existing Pock
13 matches
Mail list logo
