Re: [Cegcc-devel] Controlling architecture on binaries built

2009-05-19 Thread Vincent R.
On Tue, 19 May 2009 14:09:59 +0200, Danny Backx wrote: > Hmm, this is not something I can explain, but it may not be the cause of > your problem. > > Again, please provide details about what you're experiencing. > > Danny > I have already reported this error ten times !!! See here :

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Controlling architecture on binaries built

2009-05-19 Thread Danny Backx
Hmm, this is not something I can explain, but it may not be the cause of your problem. Again, please provide details about what you're experiencing. Danny On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 21:25 +0930, Alex Sims wrote: > You are correct is is not the device. It seems it might be some sort > of linki

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Controlling architecture on binaries built

2009-05-19 Thread Alex Sims
You are correct is is not the device. It seems it might be some sort of linking issue with COREDLL and coredll.dll More specifically I compile gosmore (source at http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/rendering/gosmore/ ) using cygwin-cegcc-mingw32ce-0.51.0-1.tar.gz and in the resultant gos

Re: [Cegcc-devel] Controlling architecture on binaries built

2009-05-17 Thread Danny Backx
I am not certain about your assessment. If your device has an arm920t then according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture (if I read it correctly) this should not be the problem. Can you specify in more detail what works and what doesn't, so we can try to assess where the problem is ?

[Cegcc-devel] Controlling architecture on binaries built

2009-05-16 Thread Alex Sims
I'm trying to compile Gosmore using arm-wince-mingw32ce-gcc to run on a low end GPS device with a arm920t processor. For some reason the WinCE 5.0 on the device will not run binaries with armv4 architecture but insists on armv3m architecture. I can compile setting -march=armv3m which works fine