> > > I've been able to upgrade binutils to 2.20 (well, to the CVS image) and
> > > build it.
> > >
> > > arm-mingw32ce-ld now identifies itself as
> > > GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20091016
> > >
> > > I need to do a few tests, then I'll commit.
> >
> > I've gotten no response from the binut
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 09:31 -0700, Eric House wrote:
> > I've been able to upgrade binutils to 2.20 (well, to the CVS image) and
> > build it.
> >
> > arm-mingw32ce-ld now identifies itself as
> > GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20091016
> >
> > I need to do a few tests, then I'll commit.
>
> I'v
> I've been able to upgrade binutils to 2.20 (well, to the CVS image) and
> build it.
>
> arm-mingw32ce-ld now identifies itself as
> GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20091016
>
> I need to do a few tests, then I'll commit.
I've gotten no response from the binutils folks on the bug filed and
patch
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 09:28 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> I've been able to upgrade binutils to 2.20 (well, to the CVS image) and
> build it.
>
> arm-mingw32ce-ld now identifies itself as
> GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20091016
>
> I need to do a few tests, then I'll commit.
Committed.
I've been able to upgrade binutils to 2.20 (well, to the CVS image) and
build it.
arm-mingw32ce-ld now identifies itself as
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20091016
I need to do a few tests, then I'll commit.
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
