> On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 13:02 -0700, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> > Yes, my fix works. But you commited something different from my fix.
> > I'm not too sure about all of this, so I figured you'd know better than me
> > :)
>
> I see a difference, don't know why this happened. Are things better
> now ?
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 13:02 -0700, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> Yes, my fix works. But you commited something different from my fix.
> I'm not too sure about all of this, so I figured you'd know better than me :)
I see a difference, don't know why this happened. Are things better
now ?
Danny
--
> On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:18 +, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 14:21 +0100, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> >
> > > > It seems to me that this was removed in the last merge. It causes
> > > > atoll() not to be declared for me.
> > >
> > > Done, thanks.
> >
> > Uh it still doesn't wor
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 14:21 +0100, Pierre Ynard wrote:
> It seems to me that this was removed in the last merge. It causes
> atoll() not to be declared for me.
Done, thanks.
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
-
Hello,
It seems to me that this was removed in the last merge. It causes
atoll() not to be declared for me.
--- trunk/cegcc/src/mingw/include/stdlib.h (révision 1398)
+++ trunk/cegcc/src/mingw/include/stdlib.h (copie de travail)
@@ -562,6 +562,10 @@
{return (_j >= 0 ? _j : -_j);}
#