y I had no need to write anything native for the device.
>
> However, the reading you pointed out seems like a very nice
> start-by-example, for which I thank you.
>
> I am getting the distinct feeling, that I will need to stick to
> eVC++ 4.0 for the task at hand.
>
&
Hi,
What you want to do is a bit crazy, it's not that easy with Visual and I
don't know if it
's a good idea to add some issues with cegcc.
In addition PocketIE is really a bad browser and except for very simple
HTML page, you never have a good
rendering...
see here for more info :
http://msdn.mi
Hum actually it seems normal tha IAT is null ...
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:33:05 +0100, mosfet wrote:
> While checking differences between cegcc and visual I have also noticed
> that :
>
> 1) Visual doesn't put a checksum in PE header but I don't think it's
&
While checking differences between cegcc and visual I have also noticed
that :
1) Visual doesn't put a checksum in PE header but I don't think it's
important
2) IAT is NULL
cegcc:
--
Dump of file TESTDLL.DLL
Data Directory
EXPORT rva: 00014000 size: 004A
IMPORT rva: 00
res created
> by binutils and/or gcc is responsible for filling up this field.
>
> Or am I completely on the wrong track ?
>
> Danny
>
No I think you are right, this is the way to go.
> On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:35 +0100, mosfet wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 2
rote UPX is doing the right thing, I don't know exactly how but
maybe when compressing and uncompressing
it fixes the issue with o32_ptr.
> On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 10:38 +0100, mosfet wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks to a great Windows Mobile Hacker/tweaker mamaich, he has
DS_OK, 0, NOMENU,
END
Now this is valid and comma will be silently eaten ...
> On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 13:36 +0100, mosfet wrote:
>> Ok one windres fix it and he will commit it into binutils:
>>
>> Index: src/binutils/rcparse.y
>> ===
have the time for it right now.
>
> Danny
>
> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 21:37 +0100, mosfet wrote:
>> Hum actually it works but couldnt' be possible to fix windres to accept
>> this syntax with comma ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008
Hi,
Thanks to a great Windows Mobile Hacker/tweaker mamaich, he has found why
cegcc binaries are not loaded on WM6.1 platforms.
Please find below his analysis :
KITL output:
167564 PID:97eeb752 TID:b5980c3a CertVerify: \testDllexe.exe trust = 2
167635 PID:97eeb752 TID:b5980c3a CertVerify: test
Hum actually it works but couldnt' be possible to fix windres to accept
this syntax with comma ?
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:23:54 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> You need to make sure that you have the right macros defined. Here's a
> Makefile that works for me :
> TARGET=arm-mingw32ce
> CC= ${TAR
Could you post your archive because when I try I still get some errors but
since I am not using
an official cegcc version but a "home made" I may have forgotten to report
some modifications.
Thanks
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:23:54 +0100, Danny Backx
wrote:
> You need to make sure that you have the
Hi,
I don't want to copy/paste from MSDN, so could you send me your project ?
And what command line are you using ?
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:46:05 -0600, "Jared Waltzer"
wrote:
> I am trying to compile the example here with the mingw32ce compiler:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms931
);
//WINBASEAPI HANDLE WINAPI GetCurrentThread(void);
//WINBASEAPI DWORD WINAPI GetCurrentThreadId(void);
//WINBASEAPI BOOL WINAPI PulseEvent(HANDLE);
//extern BOOL ResetEvent(HANDLE);
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:32:50 +0100, mosfet wrote:
> Hum first I mean you need to declare it with inline but with
Hum first I mean you need to declare it with inline but without the _ like
this.
Could you test and tell us if it solves your issue ?
winbase.h:
--
#ifdef _WIN32_WCE
inline LPVOID LockResource(HGLOBAL hResData) { return ((LPVOID)hResData); }
#else
WINBASEAPI PVOID WINAPI LockResourc
Hi,
Thanks for your report!
I think this function should be defined like visual ones as inline :
_inline DWORD WINAPI TlsAlloc(void) {
return TlsCall(TLS_FUNCALLOC, 0);
}
_inline BOOL WINAPI TlsFree(DWORD dwTlsIndex) {
return TlsCall(TLS_FUNCFREE, dwTlsIndex);
}
_inline LPVOID
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:08:29 +0100, mosfet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About the WM6.1 issue, in the case newer gcc\binutils doesn't solve the
> issue I am following another
> track.
> Actually the problem with WM6.1 comes from a modification done in the
> kernel(nk.ex
About the WM6.1 issue, in the case newer gcc\binutils doesn't solve the
issue I am following another
track.
Actually the problem with WM6.1 comes from a modification done in the
kernel(nk.exe) and especially
in the loader. What you need to know is the fact Microsoft give access to
Windows CE source
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:55:25 +0100, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Actually I think it's time to move to new versions of the tools. That
> includes gcc itself. Vincent has done excellent work on getting a cegcc
> to work based on gcc-4.3.2, we should pick that up.
>
> Opinions ?
>
>
Pedro,
I forgot to ask you if you have time, would it be possible to incorporate
into cegcc a recent version
of binutils >= 2.18.50.
I was looking into mingw mailing list and I found this :
-
"FWIW recent 2.18.50 snapsho
Hi,
I tried it and I find it amazing ...
I have developped a small application in C++/WTL but I would like to
rewrite it using this new framework.
I have some questions, what is the license ? Can I develop some commercial
software with it ?
I see that your are using zlib, libjpeg, libpng but you c
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:08:46 +0100, janrinze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 11:10 +0100, mosfet wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to know if some people have already tried the llvm compiler
that
>> may be the next open source compiler.
>> Do
Hi,
I wanted to know if some people have already tried the llvm compiler that
may be the next open source compiler.
Do you know if we can compile arm platform ?
I am asking because from what I read, tllvm would have a clean architecture
and would be easier to work on it.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Cegcc-devel] question about what to do for the libpng port
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:02:00 +0100
From: mosfet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:12:07 +0100 (CET), Vincent Torri
<[
> the best way would be libpng to add 2 functions to open and close a file,
> so that we can manage all the platform in a portable manner :)
I agree with this last solution...
But I don't understand the issue here because I thought cegcc implements
all posix functions so why do you need to
use Cr
the script
> #!/bin/sh into #!/bin/bash ?
>
> Just a thought..
>
> Jan Rinze.
>
> On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 10:14 +0200, Mosfet wrote:
>> I will check but actually it seems more complicated and finally I have
>>
>> changed the link sh->dash into sh->b
//www.lucas-nussbaum.net/blog/?p=274
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:03:08 +0200, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I've just committed a change. Can you verify it ?
>
> Danny
>
> On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 16:36 +0200, Mosfet wrote:
>
Hi,
I am trying to compile cegcc on a ubuntu 8.04 and build-cegcc.sh doesn't
compile.
After some research I've learnt that this distro now uses a new shell
called dash that is more rescrictive and respect only POSIX.
This was a change thas was made for two reasons :
1) dash is smaller an
e same but it may be a bad idea.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:05:50 +0200, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 13:56 +0200, Mosfet wrote:
>> I would like to discuss about mingw32ce and the way it's implemented.
> [..]
>> I kn
Hi,
I would like to discuss about mingw32ce and the way it's implemented.
>From what I understand you comment missing include files on the windows CE
platform like this :
/* Define to 1 if you have the header file. */
#undef HAVE_ERRNO_H
or like that
#if _GLIBCXX_HAVE_ERRNO_H
#in
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:04:38 +0200, Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The gcc-4.3.0 directory is not stable, and I'm not supporting it right
> now. Is this what you're referring to ?
>
> Danny
>
> On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 18:13 +0200, Mo
I saw that amongst modifications you are modifying
src\gcc\gcc\config\arm\ieee754-df.S
src\gcc\gcc\config\arm\ieee754-sf.S
src\gcc\gcc\config\arm\lib1funcs.asm
and your are replacing everybeq LSYM(Lad_s) by beq LSYM(ad_s)
What does it mean ?
--
Hi,
When trying to compile src from SVN trunk I get the following error with
GDB
*** BFD does not support target arm-unknown-mingw32ce.
*** Look in bfd/config.bfd for supported targets.
make[1]: *** [configure-bfd] Erreur 1
make[1]: quittant le répertoire «
/mnt/compil/repos_vincent/src
I am still stuck with this compilation error, it seems cegcc 4.3 don't take
the config/mingw32ce ...
mkdir -p ./arm-mingw32ce/bits/stdc++.h.gch
/home/Vincent/cegcc/src/build-mingw32ce/gcc/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/home/Vincent/cegcc/src/build-mingw32ce/gcc/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/home/Vince
33 matches
Mail list logo
