Re: [Cegcc-devel] A few loose ends

2007-10-22 Thread Rodolfo Hansen
I believe we should look into build cegcc with either uclibc or newlib, no? Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:09:14 -0700 > From: "Steve DeLaney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Cegcc-devel] A few loose ends > To: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=

Re: [Cegcc-devel] libtool & cegcc

2007-10-08 Thread Rodolfo Hansen
K, i'll look into that what about changing newlib for uclibc ?? How hard would that be? On 10/8/07, Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rodolfo Hansen wrote: > > > b. I tried to build from svn but there was an error where size_t was > > being redefined

Re: [Cegcc-devel] libtool & cegcc

2007-10-08 Thread Rodolfo Hansen
Ok, thanks for your help. I still ran into some obstacles though: a. I still couldn't compile with --enable-shared in configure... b. I tried to build from svn but there was an error where size_t was being redefined diferently (for gdb) I included a patch about this... not exactly the best way..

[Cegcc-devel] libtool & cegcc

2007-10-06 Thread Rodolfo Hansen
Hi, Im trying to compile libjpeg (i'm thinking of working on porting enlightenment...) when compiling with the -fPIC flag, I get this error: ./libtool-wrap --tag=CC --mode=compile arm-wince-cegcc-gcc -I/opt/cegcc/include -I. -c ./jctrans.c arm-wince-cegcc-gcc -I/opt/cegcc/include -I. -c ./jctra